IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Work disability among cancer patients

Listed author(s):
  • Greenwald, Howard P.
  • Dirks, Susan J.
  • Borgatta, Edgar F.
  • McCorkle, Ruth
  • Nevitt, Michael C.
  • Yelin, Edward H.
Registered author(s):

    To identify factors affecting the ability of persons with recent cancer diagnoses to remain in the labor force and retain premorbid levels of work performance, the investigators analyzed data on 247 individuals with lung, pancreatic, prostatic, or cervical cancer. Subjects were selected from a population-based tumor registry. According to Pearson correlations, ordinary least squares multiple regression, and logistic analysis, physical factors related to disease were the strongest predictors of work disability, defined as either leaving the labor force or functioning less fully at work than before becoming ill. The strongest predictors of work disability were physical dysfunction measured by the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and disease stage. Social background factors such as age, sex, income, and education were not statistically significant predictors. Two job characteristics, (1) physical demands of work and (2) discretion over hours worked and how much work would be done, predicted work disability, the latter appearing to help prevent this condition. Strictly disease-related factors appear more important here in predicting work disability than in studies of other diseases. Still, it appears that increasing flexibility of working hours and the pace of work could help some individuals with cancer histories remain in the labor force. Unwillingness of employers to facilitate such accommodation where technically feasible may constitute a form of discrimination against the cancer patient.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 29 (1989)
    Issue (Month): 11 (January)
    Pages: 1253-1259

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:11:p:1253-1259
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:11:p:1253-1259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.