IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v292y2022ics0277953621008960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two sides to every coin: Assessing the effects of moving physicians to employment contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Gifford, Rachel
  • Molleman, Eric
  • van der Vaart, Taco

Abstract

There is a growing trend of physicians becoming employees of hospital systems and employment is viewed as a mechanism to help achieve health system goals. Yet, the research is mixed on the effects of moving physicians to employment models. While the literature has traditionally placed such forms of employment relationships in opposition to professional autonomy, it has often overlooked the effects on other professional values and there is little empirical work that actually assesses how such a shift affects and is perceived by clinicians themselves. To address these gaps, we conducted a mixed method study at one hospital that recently moved all formerly self-employed physicians to employment contracts. We interviewed physicians to understand how the shift into employment was perceived to influence their work in three domains: the patient domain, the individual domain and the organizational domain. We then conducted a follow-up survey across both formerly employed and self-employed physicians to test our initial findings. We find both positive and negative effects in different domains, offering insights into the mixed results found in the current literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Gifford, Rachel & Molleman, Eric & van der Vaart, Taco, 2022. "Two sides to every coin: Assessing the effects of moving physicians to employment contracts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:292:y:2022:i:c:s0277953621008960
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621008960
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Racko, Girts, 2017. "Bureaucratization and medical professionals’ values: A cross-national analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 76-84.
    2. Toth, Federico, 2015. "Sovereigns under Siege. How the medical profession is changing in Italy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 128-134.
    3. Quentin, Wilm & Geissler, Alexander & Wittenbecher, Friedrich & Ballinger, Geoff & Berenson, Robert & Bloor, Karen & Forgione, Dana A. & Köpf, Peer & Kroneman, Madelon & Serden, Lisbeth & Suarez, Raúl, 2018. "Paying hospital specialists: Experiences and lessons from eight high-income countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(5), pages 473-484.
    4. Paul S. Adler & Seok-Woo Kwon, 2013. "The Mutation of Professionalism as a Contested Diffusion Process: Clinical Guidelines as Carriers of Institutional Change in Medicine," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 930-962, July.
    5. Lin, Katherine Y., 2014. "Physicians' perceptions of autonomy across practice types: Is autonomy in solo practice a myth?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Racko, Girts, 2017. "Bureaucratization and medical professionals’ values: A cross-national analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 76-84.
    2. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Myra Sosas & Neifertiti B. Gosiengfiao, 2021. "Practice of Professional Values of Hospital Nurses in Bacolod City," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 625-638, April.
    4. Schmidt, Andrea E. & Merkur, Sherry & Haindl, Anita & Gerkens, Sophie & Gandré, Coralie & Or, Zeynep & Groenewegen, Peter & Kroneman, Madelon & de Jong, Judith & Albreht, Tit & Vracko, Pia & Mantwill,, 2022. "Tackling the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial responses in 2020 in selected social health insurance countries in Europe☆," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 476-484.
    5. Daniel Muzio & David M. Brock & Roy Suddaby, 2013. "Professions and Institutional Change: Towards an Institutionalist Sociology of the Professions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 699-721, July.
    6. Anthony C Waddimba & David C Mohr & Howard B Beckman & Mark M Meterko, 2020. "Physicians’ perceptions of autonomy support during transition to value-based reimbursement: A multi-center psychometric evaluation of six-item and three-item measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Llopis, Oscar & D’Este, Pablo, 2016. "Beneficiary contact and innovation: The relation between contact with patients and medical innovation under different institutional logics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1512-1523.
    8. Buzzacchi, Luigi & Scellato, Giuseppe & Ughetto, Elisa, 2016. "Frequency of medical malpractice claims: The effects of volumes and specialties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 152-160.
    9. Girts Racko, 2019. "Does Economic Rationalization Decrease or Increase Accounting Professionals’ Occupational Values?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 763-777, September.
    10. repec:thr:techub:10018:y:2021:i:1:p:625-638 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Levi, Baruch & Zehavi, Amos & Chinitz, David, 2018. "Taking the measure of the profession: Physician associations in the measurement age," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 746-754.
    12. Sandra G. Leggat & Pauline Stanton & Greg J. Bamber & Timothy Bartram & Richard Gough & Ruth Ballardie & Kathy GermAnn & Amrik Sohal, 2018. ": 4P recommendations for implementing change, from research in hospitals," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 45-50, January.
    13. Gaal, Peter & Velkey, Zita & Szerencses, Viktoria & Webb, Erin, 2021. "The 2020 reform of the employment status of Hungarian health workers: Will it eliminate informal payments and separate the public and private sectors from each other?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(7), pages 833-840.
    14. Timmermans, Stefan & Tietbohl, Caroline, 2018. "Fifty years of sociological leadership at Social Science and Medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 209-215.
    15. Nigel D. Caldwell & Jens K. Roehrich & Gerard George, 2017. "Social Value Creation and Relational Coordination in Public-Private Collaborations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 906-928, September.
    16. Waitzberg, Ruth & Gerkens, Sophie & Dimova, Antoniya & Bryndová, Lucie & Vrangbæk, Karsten & Jervelund, Signe Smith & Birk, Hans Okkels & Rajan, Selina & Habicht, Triin & Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa & Kesk, 2022. "Balancing financial incentives during COVID-19: A comparison of provider payment adjustments across 20 countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 398-407.
    17. D'Este, Pablo & Mc Kelvey, Maureen & Yegros-Yegros, Alfredo, 2018. "Innovation from science: the role of network content and legitimacy ties," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201802, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), revised 28 Oct 2019.
    18. Andersson, Thomas & Gadolin, Christian, 2020. "Understanding institutional work through social interaction in highly institutionalized settings: Lessons from public healthcare organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    19. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & Díaz-Faes, Adrián A., 2021. "Connecting others: Does a tertius iungens orientation shape the relationship between research networks and innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    20. Ortiga, Yasmin Y. & Diño, Michael Joseph & Macabasag, Romeo Luis A., 2022. "Clocking out: Nurses refusing to work in a time of pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    21. Giovanna Vicarelli, 2016. "Stress, burnout e insoddisfazione dei medici: un campo di indagine aperto," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 9-20.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:292:y:2022:i:c:s0277953621008960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.