IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v99y2025ics0038012125000692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated decision framework for landfill mining site selection using GIS, multi-criteria analysis, and optimization models

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Tai-Hsi
  • Chen, Chun-Yuan
  • Huang, Shi-Wei
  • Yu, Teng-To

Abstract

Most studies on landfill management focus on siting new landfills (LSS), while the selection of landfill mining sites (LMSS) in environmentally unsuitable areas remains underexplored. To address this gap, this study proposes a novel three-stage decision-making framework that integrates multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM), geographic information systems (GIS), hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTS), K-means clustering, and a capacitated plant location model (CPLM). Unlike previous research that relies on case-specific analyses or subjective expert judgment, this framework provides a systematic, data-driven approach to optimize landfill mining decisions while minimizing costs. In Stage 1, GIS-based MCDM evaluates landfill suitability. Stage 2 incorporates HFLTS to account for decision-makers' hesitation in criteria weighting, while K-means clustering categorizes landfills into three types: A (lifespan extension), B (do nothing), and C (priority for mining and removal). Finally, in Stage 3, CPLM optimizes excavation, transportation, and disposal costs, integrating enhanced landfill mining (ELFM) efficiency levels (50 %–90 %). Applied in Taiwan, this framework identified 17 landfills for removal, reclaiming 66 ha of land, with an estimated economic benefit of NT$3.96–13.2 G. Sensitivity analysis highlights the cost-reduction potential of ELFM efficiency improvements, demonstrating the framework's adaptability across different policy contexts. The findings provide policymakers with a scientifically grounded tool to advance sustainable waste management and zero-waste initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Tai-Hsi & Chen, Chun-Yuan & Huang, Shi-Wei & Yu, Teng-To, 2025. "An integrated decision framework for landfill mining site selection using GIS, multi-criteria analysis, and optimization models," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000692
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000692
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen-Tien Tsai, 2019. "Promoting the Circular Economy via Waste-to-Power (WTP) in Taiwan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Karwan Alkaradaghi & Salahalddin S. Ali & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Jan Laue & Ali Chabuk, 2019. "Landfill Site Selection Using MCDM Methods and GIS in the Sulaimaniyah Governorate, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Louise Gallagher & Susana Ferreira & Frank Convery, 2008. "Host community attitudes towards solid waste landfill infrastructure: comprehension before compensation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 233-257.
    4. Chi-Hung Tsai & Yun-Hwei Shen & Wen-Tien Tsai, 2020. "Analysis of Current Status and Regulatory Promotion for Incineration Bottom Ash Recycling in Taiwan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, September.
    5. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Javed Mallick, 2021. "Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection Based on Fuzzy-AHP and Geoinformation Techniques in Asir Region Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Roberto Zoboli, 2008. "Waste Generation, Incineration and Landfill Diversion. De-coupling Trends, Socio-Economic Drivers and Policy Effectiveness in the EU," Working Papers 2008.94, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Aarthi Aishwarya Devendran & Brijesh Mainali & Dilip Khatiwada & Farzin Golzar & Krushna Mahapatra & Camila H. Toigo, 2023. "Optimization of Municipal Waste Streams in Achieving Urban Circularity in the City of Curitiba, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Dhafer Alqahtani & Javed Mallick & Abdulmohsen M. Alqahtani & Swapan Talukdar, 2024. "Optimizing Residential Construction Site Selection in Mountainous Regions Using Geospatial Data and eXplainable AI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Mariano Gallo, 2019. "An Optimisation Model to Consider the NIMBY Syndrome within the Landfill Siting Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Aitken, Mhairi, 2010. "Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6066-6075, October.
    6. Rosário Oliveira & Gabriel Spínola Garcia Távora, 2025. "Mapping the Potential to Establish Multifunctional Agrofood Parks to Foster the Food Transition at a Regional Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Zygmunt Kowalski & Joanna Kulczycka & Agnieszka Makara & Roland Verhé & Guy De Clercq, 2022. "Assessment of Energy Recovery from Municipal Waste Management Systems Using Circular Economy Quality Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Ali Utku Akar & Mevlut Uyan & Sukran Yalpir, 2024. "Spatial evaluation of the nuclear power plant installation based on energy demand for sustainable energy policy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 8607-8642, April.
    9. Ishimura, Yuichi & Takeuchi, Kenji & Carlsson, Fredrik, 2014. "NIMBY or YIMBY? Municipalities' reaction to disaster waste from the Great East Japan Earthquake," Working Papers in Economics 597, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    10. Alina Elena Ionașcu & Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Alexandra Dănilă & Maria-Gabriela Horga & Corina Aurora Barbu & Adrian Şerban-Comǎnescu, 2024. "Analyzing Primary Sector Selection for Economic Activity in Romania: An Interval-Valued Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-38, April.
    11. Mohammed Alghassab, 2023. "A Computational Case Study on Sustainable Energy Transition in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Wang, Qipeng & Zhao, Liang, 2023. "Data-driven stochastic robust optimization of sustainable utility system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Zaid M. Aldhafeeri & Hatem Alhazmi, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in the Framework of Circular Economy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Amiri, Ali Ahmad & Wahid, Muhammad Nurdin & Al-Buraiki, Abdulrahman S. & Al-Sharafi, Abdullah, 2024. "A strategic multi-criteria decision-making framework for renewable energy source selection in Saudi Arabia using AHP-TOPSIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    15. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Ivana Carević & Mikica Sibinović & Sanja Manojlović & Natalija Batoćanin & Aleksandar S. Petrović & Tanja Srejić, 2021. "Geological Approach for Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study of Vršac Municipality, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri & Ahmed, Abubakari & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Oteng-Ababio, Martin & Luginaah, Isaac, 2020. "Of waste facility siting and relational geographies of place: Peri-urban landfills, community resistance and the politics of land control in Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Yumeng Zhao & Kai Ren & Wenfang Huang, 2023. "Which Is More Environmentally Friendly? A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Two Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Plastics Based on an LCA Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Felipe Romero-Perdomo & Miguel Ángel González-Curbelo, 2023. "Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    20. Thai Hoang Tuyet Nhi & Chia-Nan Wang & Nguyen Van Thanh, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Application in Geothermal Power Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.