IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/revfin/v11y2002i3p225-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leverage, liquidity, volatility, time horizon, and the risk of ruin: A barrier option approach

Author

Listed:
  • Norland, Erik
  • Wilford, D. Sykes

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Norland, Erik & Wilford, D. Sykes, 2002. "Leverage, liquidity, volatility, time horizon, and the risk of ruin: A barrier option approach," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 225-239.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:revfin:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:225-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058-3300(02)00046-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Carr, 1995. "Two extensions to barrier option valuation," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 173-209.
    2. Naoto Kunitomo & Masayuki Ikeda, 1992. "Pricing Options With Curved Boundaries1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(4), pages 275-298, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D. Sykes Wilford, 2012. "True Markowitz or assumptions we break and why it matters," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 93-101, September.
    2. Wilford, D. Sykes, 2012. "True Markowitz or assumptions we break and why it matters," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 93-101.
    3. Karagiannidis, Iordanis & Sykes Wilford, D., 2015. "Modeling fund and portfolio risk: A bi-modal approach to analyzing risk in turbulent markets," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 19-26.
    4. Iordanis Karagiannidis & D. Sykes Wilford, 2015. "Modeling fund and portfolio risk: A bi‐modal approach to analyzing risk in turbulent markets," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 19-26, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jerim & Kim, Jeongsim & Joo Yoo, Hyun & Kim, Bara, 2015. "Pricing external barrier options in a regime-switching model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 123-143.
    2. Zura Kakushadze, 2020. "Option Pricing: Channels, Target Zones and Sideways Markets," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 25-33.
    3. Zvan, R. & Vetzal, K. R. & Forsyth, P. A., 2000. "PDE methods for pricing barrier options," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1563-1590, October.
    4. Erik Norland & D.Sykes Wilford, 2002. "Leverage, liquidity, volatility, time horizon, and the risk of ruin," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 225-239.
    5. Andrew Ming-Long Wang & Yu-Hong Liu & Yi-Long Hsiao, 2009. "Barrier option pricing: a hybrid method approach," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 341-352.
    6. Zura Kakushadze, 2020. "Option Pricing: Channels, Target Zones and Sideways Markets," Papers 2006.14121, arXiv.org.
    7. Jun, Doobae & Ku, Hyejin, 2015. "Static hedging of chained-type barrier options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 317-327.
    8. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742, Decembrie.
    9. Bekiros, Stelios & Kouloumpou, Dimitra, 2019. "On the pricing of exotic options: A new closed-form valuation approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 153-162.
    10. Fernández Lexuri & Hieber Peter & Scherer Matthias, 2013. "Double-barrier first-passage times of jump-diffusion processes," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 107-141, July.
    11. Hangsuck Lee & Gaeun Lee & Seongjoo Song, 2021. "Multi-step Reflection Principle and Barrier Options," Papers 2105.15008, arXiv.org.
    12. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2014_002 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Hans-Peter Bermin, 2000. "Hedging lookback and partial lookback options using Malliavin calculus," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 75-100.
    14. Tristan Guillaume, 2011. "Some sequential boundary crossing results for geometric Brownian motion and their applications in financial engineering," Post-Print hal-00924277, HAL.
    15. Andre Catalao & Rogerio Rosenfeld, 2018. "Analytical Path-Integral Pricing of Moving-Barrier Options under non-Gaussian Distributions," Papers 1804.07852, arXiv.org.
    16. J. Mart'in Ovejero, 2022. "Vanna-Volga pricing for single and double barrier FX options," Papers 2211.12652, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    17. Lee, Hangsuck & Ko, Bangwon & Lee, Minha, 2023. "The pricing and static hedging of multi-step double barrier options," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    18. Jokivuolle, Esa & Keppo, Jussi, 2014. "Bankers' compensation: Sprint swimming in short bonus pools?," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 2/2014, Bank of Finland.
    19. Jos� Carlos Dias & João Pedro Vidal Nunes & João Pedro Ruas, 2015. "Pricing and static hedging of European-style double barrier options under the jump to default extended CEV model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(12), pages 1995-2010, December.
    20. Gregor Dorfleitner & Paul Schneider & Kurt Hawlitschek & Arne Buch, 2008. "Pricing options with Green's functions when volatility, interest rate and barriers depend on time," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 119-133.
    21. M. Krivko & M. V. Tretyakov, 2012. "Application of simplest random walk algorithms for pricing barrier options," Papers 1211.5726, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:revfin:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:225-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.