IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1211.5726.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Application of simplest random walk algorithms for pricing barrier options

Author

Listed:
  • M. Krivko
  • M. V. Tretyakov

Abstract

We demonstrate effectiveness of the first-order algorithm from [Milstein, Tretyakov. Theory Prob. Appl. 47 (2002), 53-68] in application to barrier option pricing. The algorithm uses the weak Euler approximation far from barriers and a special construction motivated by linear interpolation of the price near barriers. It is easy to implement and is universal: it can be applied to various structures of the contracts including derivatives on multi-asset correlated underlyings and can deal with various type of barriers. In contrast to the Brownian bridge techniques currently commonly used for pricing barrier options, the algorithm tested here does not require knowledge of trigger probabilities nor their estimates. We illustrate this algorithm via pricing a barrier caplet, barrier trigger swap and barrier swaption.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Krivko & M. V. Tretyakov, 2012. "Application of simplest random walk algorithms for pricing barrier options," Papers 1211.5726, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1211.5726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.5726
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuel Gobet, 2009. "Advanced Monte Carlo methods for barrier and related exotic options," Post-Print hal-00319947, HAL.
    2. Naoto Kunitomo & Masayuki Ikeda, 1992. "Pricing Options With Curved Boundaries1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(4), pages 275-298, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hangsuck Lee & Gaeun Lee & Seongjoo Song, 2021. "Multi-step Reflection Principle and Barrier Options," Papers 2105.15008, arXiv.org.
    2. Fernández Lexuri & Hieber Peter & Scherer Matthias, 2013. "Double-barrier first-passage times of jump-diffusion processes," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 107-141, July.
    3. Hangsuck Lee & Gaeun Lee & Seongjoo Song, 2022. "Multi‐step reflection principle and barrier options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 692-721, April.
    4. Jun, Doobae & Ku, Hyejin, 2015. "Static hedging of chained-type barrier options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 317-327.
    5. Tristan Guillaume, 2011. "Some sequential boundary crossing results for geometric Brownian motion and their applications in financial engineering," Post-Print hal-00924277, HAL.
    6. Andre Catalao & Rogerio Rosenfeld, 2018. "Analytical Path-Integral Pricing of Moving-Barrier Options under non-Gaussian Distributions," Papers 1804.07852, arXiv.org.
    7. J. Mart'in Ovejero, 2022. "Vanna-Volga pricing for single and double barrier FX options," Papers 2211.12652, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    8. Kim, Jerim & Kim, Jeongsim & Joo Yoo, Hyun & Kim, Bara, 2015. "Pricing external barrier options in a regime-switching model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 123-143.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Lee, Hangsuck & Lee, Gaeun & Song, Seongjoo, 2023. "Min–max multi-step barrier options and their variants," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Pavel V. Shevchenko & Pierre Del Moral, 2014. "Valuation of Barrier Options using Sequential Monte Carlo," Papers 1405.5294, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2015.
    12. Zhang, Jiayi & Zhou, Ke, 2024. "Analytical valuation of vulnerable chained options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Lee, Hangsuck & Jeong, Himchan & Lee, Minha, 2022. "Multi-step double barrier options," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    14. Li, Minqiang & Pearson, Neil D. & Poteshman, Allen M., 2004. "Conditional estimation of diffusion processes," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 31-66, October.
    15. Bougias, Alexandros & Episcopos, Athanasios & Leledakis, George N., 2022. "The role of asset payouts in the estimation of default barriers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Yongsik Kim & Hyeong-Ohk Bae & Hyeng Keun Koo, 2014. "Option pricing and Greeks via a moving least square meshfree method," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 1753-1764, October.
    17. Yuh‐Dauh Lyuu & Yu‐Quan Zhang, 2023. "Pricing multiasset time‐varying double‐barrier options with time‐dependent parameters," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 404-434, March.
    18. Doobae Jun & Hyejin Ku, 2013. "Valuation of American partial barrier options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 167-191, July.
    19. Prigent, Jean-Luc & Renault, Olivier & Scaillet, Olivier, 2004. "Option pricing with discrete rebalancing," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 133-161, January.
    20. Youngchul Han & Geonwoo Kim, 2016. "Efficient Lattice Method for Valuing of Options with Barrier in a Regime Switching Model," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-14, October.
    21. C. Atkinson & S. Kazantzaki, 2009. "Double knock-out Asian barrier options which widen or contract as they approach maturity," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 329-340.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1211.5726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.