IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v98y2018icp79-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of performance metrics for the Wave Energy Prize converters tested at 1/20th scale

Author

Listed:
  • Dallman, Ann
  • Jenne, Dale S.
  • Neary, Vincent
  • Driscoll, Frederick
  • Thresher, Robert
  • Gunawan, Budi

Abstract

It is expected that wave energy technologies will play a future role in providing clean renewable energy and diversifying energy portfolios; however, they are still at an early stage of development compared to other renewables, with varying archetypes proposed. As technologies advance toward commercialization, benchmarking is needed to quantify performance and costs. In this review, experimental datasets of Wave Energy Converter (WEC) devices tested in the final stage of the Wave Energy Prize (WEPrize) are compared and ranked using performance metrics found in the literature and those developed as WEPrize judging metrics at both U.S. and European representative wave climates. Because the WEPrize devices were tested under a set of identical sea states, which ranged from typical operating conditions to extreme storm events, consistent datasets were produced to facilitate comparison. This allows for a rare addition to the open literature on device performance trends. In addition, a reevaluation of trends established in previous power performance benchmarking studies is given. Trends found in previous studies were confirmed, except for the absorbed energy per characteristic mass metric, in which some of the WEPrize devices had higher values. Each of the metrics considered in this study has limitations due to the assumptions in simplifying the economic potential (e.g., power absorbed vs. a proxy to cost). In addition, each of these proxies is limited to the capital cost of a device, unlike the final metric used in the WEPrize, HPQ, which includes limited proxies of operational and capital expenditures, as well as array considerations. Recommendations are given for the use and potential modification of the metrics considered. Specifically, it is recommended that the ACE metric (from the WEPrize) be modified to more accurately include the other important system costs, such as the PTO and mooring, as well as installation, operation and maintenance costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dallman, Ann & Jenne, Dale S. & Neary, Vincent & Driscoll, Frederick & Thresher, Robert & Gunawan, Budi, 2018. "Evaluation of performance metrics for the Wave Energy Prize converters tested at 1/20th scale," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 79-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:98:y:2018:i:c:p:79-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118306452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babarit, A., 2015. "A database of capture width ratio of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 610-628.
    2. Babarit, A. & Hals, J. & Muliawan, M.J. & Kurniawan, A. & Moan, T. & Krokstad, J., 2012. "Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 44-63.
    3. Uihlein, Andreas & Magagna, Davide, 2016. "Wave and tidal current energy – A review of the current state of research beyond technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1070-1081.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2020. "Effect of Spatial and Temporal Resolution Data on Design and Power Capture of a Heaving Point Absorber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Harry B. Bingham & Yi-Hsiang Yu & Kim Nielsen & Thanh Toan Tran & Kyong-Hwan Kim & Sewan Park & Keyyong Hong & Hafiz Ahsan Said & Thomas Kelly & John V. Ringwood & Robert W. Read & Edward Ransley & Sc, 2021. "Ocean Energy Systems Wave Energy Modeling Task 10.4: Numerical Modeling of a Fixed Oscillating Water Column," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    3. Enrico Giglio & Ermando Petracca & Bruno Paduano & Claudio Moscoloni & Giuseppe Giorgi & Sergej Antonello Sirigu, 2023. "Estimating the Cost of Wave Energy Converters at an Early Design Stage: A Bottom-Up Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-39, April.
    4. Bertram, D.V. & Tarighaleslami, A.H. & Walmsley, M.R.W. & Atkins, M.J. & Glasgow, G.D.E., 2020. "A systematic approach for selecting suitable wave energy converters for potential wave energy farm sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Jin, Chungkuk & Kang, HeonYong & Kim, MooHyun & Cho, Ilhyoung, 2020. "Performance estimation of resonance-enhanced dual-buoy wave energy converter using coupled time-domain simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1445-1457.
    6. Yi Zhang & Dapeng Zhang & Haoyu Jiang, 2023. "A Review of Offshore Wind and Wave Installations in Some Areas with an Eye towards Generating Economic Benefits and Offering Commercial Inspiration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-32, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian De Andres & Jéromine Maillet & Jørgen Hals Todalshaug & Patrik Möller & David Bould & Henry Jeffrey, 2016. "Techno-Economic Related Metrics for a Wave Energy Converters Feasibility Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, October.
    2. George Lavidas & Vengatesan Venugopal, 2018. "Energy Production Benefits by Wind and Wave Energies for the Autonomous System of Crete," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Nasrollahi, Sadaf & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Jahangir, Mohammad-Hossein & Aryaee, Sara, 2023. "Selecting suitable wave energy technology for sustainable development, an MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 756-772.
    4. Lavidas, George & Venugopal, Vengatesan, 2017. "A 35 year high-resolution wave atlas for nearshore energy production and economics at the Aegean Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 401-417.
    5. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2020. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the optimisation algorithm and the geometry definition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    6. Bertram, D.V. & Tarighaleslami, A.H. & Walmsley, M.R.W. & Atkins, M.J. & Glasgow, G.D.E., 2020. "A systematic approach for selecting suitable wave energy converters for potential wave energy farm sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Wang, Yingguang & Wang, Lifu, 2018. "Towards realistically predicting the power outputs of wave energy converters: Nonlinear simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 120-128.
    8. Choupin, O. & Têtu, A. & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Ferri, F. & Kofoed, JP., 2022. "Premises for an annual energy production and capacity factor improvement towards a few optimised wave energy converters configurations and resources pairs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    9. Dragić, Mile & Hofman, Milan & Tomin, Veselin & Miškov, Vladimir, 2023. "Sea trials of Sigma wave energy converter – Power and efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 748-766.
    10. Ulazia, Alain & Penalba, Markel & Ibarra-Berastegui, Gabriel & Ringwood, John & Sáenz, Jon, 2019. "Reduction of the capture width of wave energy converters due to long-term seasonal wave energy trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Carrelhas, A.A.D. & Gato, L.M.C. & Falcão, A.F.O. & Henriques, J.C.C., 2021. "Control law design for the air-turbine-generator set of a fully submerged 1.5 MW mWave prototype. Part 2: Experimental validation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1002-1013.
    12. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2019. "Review on Power Performance and Efficiency of Wave Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Bechlenberg, Alva & Wei, Yanji & Jayawardhana, Bayu & Vakis, Antonis I., 2023. "Analysing the influence of power take-off adaptability on the power extraction of dense wave energy converter arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Garcia-Teruel, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2021. "A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    15. Lavidas, George, 2020. "Selection index for Wave Energy Deployments (SIWED): A near-deterministic index for wave energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Rusu, Liliana & Onea, Florin, 2017. "The performance of some state-of-the-art wave energy converters in locations with the worldwide highest wave power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1348-1362.
    17. Roy, Sanjoy, 2021. "Analytical estimates of short duration mean power output and variability for deepwater wave power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Babarit, Aurélien & Bull, Diana & Dykes, Katherine & Malins, Robert & Nielsen, Kim & Costello, Ronan & Roberts, Jesse & Bittencourt Ferreira, Claudio & Kennedy, Ben & Weber, Jochem, 2017. "Stakeholder requirements for commercially successful wave energy converter farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 742-755.
    19. Rusu, Eugen & Onea, Florin, 2019. "An assessment of the wind and wave power potential in the island environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 830-846.
    20. Rasool, Safdar & Muttaqi, Kashem M. & Sutanto, Danny & Hemer, Mark, 2022. "Quantifying the reduction in power variability of co-located offshore wind-wave farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1018-1033.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:98:y:2018:i:c:p:79-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.