IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v62y2016icp495-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ångström–Prescott equation: Physical basis, empirical models and sensitivity analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Paulescu, M.
  • Stefu, N.
  • Calinoiu, D.
  • Paulescu, E.
  • Pop, N.
  • Boata, R.
  • Mares, O.

Abstract

The Ångström–Prescott equation defines generically the relationship between solar energy available at ground level and sunshine duration. From the very beginning in the history of the solar converters, the equation was extensively used to estimate the amount of collectable solar energy. In this paper the Ångström–Prescott equation is reviewed from three different perspectives: (1) the physical basis, (2) the accuracy of the empirical models and (3) the sensitivity to geographical and seasonal factors. A mathematical derivation of the Ångström–Prescott equation is performed, showing the approximations behind it and the physical meaning of the coefficients. A number of 33 empirical Ångström–Prescott equations of different degrees of complexity and originated from different location around the world are being analyzed and tested against data recorded at 59 European stations. No model is ranked as the best, but the specific situations when a model performs better than others are discussed. A comparative study on the influence of different parameters (latitude, altitude, season, local climatology) on the performance of the Ångström–Prescott equations is presented. It is shown that an Ångström–Prescott equation having relative sunshine, altitude and the month index as input parameters can explain roughly 90% of the variability in the data from the entire database considered in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulescu, M. & Stefu, N. & Calinoiu, D. & Paulescu, E. & Pop, N. & Boata, R. & Mares, O., 2016. "Ångström–Prescott equation: Physical basis, empirical models and sensitivity analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 495-506.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:495-506
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116300296
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khatib, Tamer & Mohamed, Azah & Sopian, K., 2012. "A review of solar energy modeling techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2864-2869.
    2. Said, R. & Mansor, M. & Abuain, T., 1998. "Estimation of global and diffuse radiation at Tripoli," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 221-227.
    3. Bakirci, Kadir, 2009. "Correlations for estimation of daily global solar radiation with hours of bright sunshine in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 485-501.
    4. Bakirci, Kadir, 2009. "Models of solar radiation with hours of bright sunshine: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2580-2588, December.
    5. Mohanty, Sthitapragyan & Patra, Prashanta Kumar & Sahoo, Sudhansu Sekhar, 2016. "Prediction and application of solar radiation with soft computing over traditional and conventional approach – A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 778-796.
    6. Besharat, Fariba & Dehghan, Ali A. & Faghih, Ahmad R., 2013. "Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 798-821.
    7. Kumar, Rajesh & Aggarwal, R.K. & Sharma, J.D., 2015. "Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for estimation of global solar radiations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1294-1299.
    8. Polo, J. & Gastón, M. & Vindel, J.M. & Pagola, I., 2015. "Spatial variability and clustering of global solar irradiation in Vietnam from sunshine duration measurements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1326-1334.
    9. Vivar, M. & Fuentes, M. & Norton, M. & Makrides, G. & de Bustamante, I., 2014. "Estimation of sunshine duration from the global irradiance measured by a photovoltaic silicon solar cell," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 26-33.
    10. Iacobescu, Flavius & Badescu, Viorel, 2012. "The potential of the local administration as driving force for the implementation of the National PV systems Strategy in Romania," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 117-125.
    11. Badescu, Viorel & Gueymard, Christian A. & Cheval, Sorin & Oprea, Cristian & Baciu, Madalina & Dumitrescu, Alexandru & Iacobescu, Flavius & Milos, Ioan & Rada, Costel, 2012. "Computing global and diffuse solar hourly irradiation on clear sky. Review and testing of 54 models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1636-1656.
    12. Almorox, J. & Benito, M. & Hontoria, C., 2005. "Estimation of monthly Angström–Prescott equation coefficients from measured daily data in Toledo, Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 931-936.
    13. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2015. "Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1869-1880.
    14. Bahel, V. & Srinivasan, R. & Bakhsh, H., 1986. "Solar radiation for Dhahran, Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(10), pages 985-989.
    15. Katiyar, A.K. & Pandey, Chanchal Kumar, 2010. "Simple correlation for estimating the global solar radiation on horizontal surfaces in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5043-5048.
    16. Mecibah, Mohamed Salah & Boukelia, Taqiy Eddine & Tahtah, Reda & Gairaa, Kacem, 2014. "Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Case study: Algeria)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 194-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Makade, Rahul G. & Chakrabarti, Siddharth & Jamil, Basharat & Sakhale, C.N., 2020. "Estimation of global solar radiation for the tropical wet climatic region of India: A theory of experimentation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2044-2059.
    2. Almorox, Javier & Arnaldo, J.A. & Bailek, Nadjem & Martí, Pau, 2020. "Adjustment of the Angstrom-Prescott equation from Campbell-Stokes and Kipp-Zonen sunshine measures at different timescales in Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 337-350.
    3. Yıldırım, H. Başak & Teke, Ahmet & Antonanzas-Torres, Fernando, 2018. "Evaluation of classical parametric models for estimating solar radiation in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2053-2065.
    4. Ramgolam, Yatindra Kumar & Soyjaudah, Krishnaraj Madhavjee Sunjiv, 2017. "Holistic performance appraisal of a photovoltaic system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 440-448.
    5. Chen, Ji-Long & He, Lei & Yang, Hong & Ma, Maohua & Chen, Qiao & Wu, Sheng-Jun & Xiao, Zuo-lin, 2019. "Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-111.
    6. Cheng, Liang & Zhang, Fangli & Li, Shuyi & Mao, Junya & Xu, Hao & Ju, Weimin & Liu, Xiaoqiang & Wu, Jie & Min, Kaifu & Zhang, Xuedong & Li, Manchun, 2020. "Solar energy potential of urban buildings in 10 cities of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Paulescu, Marius & Badescu, Viorel & Budea, Sanda & Dumitrescu, Alexandru, 2022. "Empirical sunshine-based models vs online estimators for solar resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Feng, Lan & Lin, Aiwen & Wang, Lunche & Qin, Wenmin & Gong, Wei, 2018. "Evaluation of sunshine-based models for predicting diffuse solar radiation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 168-182.
    9. Wu, Wei & Tang, Xiaoping & Lv, Jiake & Yang, Chao & Liu, Hongbin, 2021. "Potential of Bayesian additive regression trees for predicting daily global and diffuse solar radiation in arid and humid areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 148-163.
    10. Li, Yan & Ming, Bo & Huang, Qiang & Wang, Yimin & Liu, Pan & Guo, Pengcheng, 2022. "Identifying effective operating rules for large hydro–solar–wind hybrid systems based on an implicit stochastic optimization framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2015. "Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1869-1880.
    2. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    3. Zhang, Jianyuan & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Xu, Weicong & Zhang, Ying, 2017. "A critical review of the models used to estimate solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 314-329.
    4. Bayrakçı, Hilmi Cenk & Demircan, Cihan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2018. "The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2771-2782.
    5. Khalil, Samy A. & Shaffie, A.M., 2016. "Evaluation of transposition models of solar irradiance over Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 105-119.
    6. Hassan, Gasser E. & Youssef, M. Elsayed & Mohamed, Zahraa E. & Ali, Mohamed A. & Hanafy, Ahmed A., 2016. "New Temperature-based Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 437-450.
    7. Makade, Rahul G. & Jamil, Basharat, 2018. "Statistical analysis of sunshine based global solar radiation (GSR) models for tropical wet and dry climatic Region in Nagpur, India: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 22-43.
    8. Chen, Ji-Long & He, Lei & Yang, Hong & Ma, Maohua & Chen, Qiao & Wu, Sheng-Jun & Xiao, Zuo-lin, 2019. "Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-111.
    9. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    10. Besharat, Fariba & Dehghan, Ali A. & Faghih, Ahmad R., 2013. "Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 798-821.
    11. Makade, Rahul G. & Chakrabarti, Siddharth & Jamil, Basharat & Sakhale, C.N., 2020. "Estimation of global solar radiation for the tropical wet climatic region of India: A theory of experimentation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2044-2059.
    12. Mecibah, Mohamed Salah & Boukelia, Taqiy Eddine & Tahtah, Reda & Gairaa, Kacem, 2014. "Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Case study: Algeria)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 194-202.
    13. Jahani, Babak & Dinpashoh, Y. & Raisi Nafchi, Atefeh, 2017. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 878-891.
    14. Qin, Wenmin & Wang, Lunche & Lin, Aiwen & Zhang, Ming & Xia, Xiangao & Hu, Bo & Niu, Zigeng, 2018. "Comparison of deterministic and data-driven models for solar radiation estimation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 579-594.
    15. Fan, Junliang & Chen, Baiquan & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Lu, Xianghui & Xiang, Youzhen, 2018. "Evaluation and development of temperature-based empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in humid regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 903-914.
    16. Samuel Chukwujindu, Nwokolo, 2017. "A comprehensive review of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 955-995.
    17. Halawa, Edward & GhaffarianHoseini, AmirHosein & Hin Wa Li, Danny, 2014. "Empirical correlations as a means for estimating monthly average daily global radiation: A critical overview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 149-153.
    18. Jamil, Basharat & Akhtar, Naiem, 2017. "Comparison of empirical models to estimate monthly mean diffuse solar radiation from measured data: Case study for humid-subtropical climatic region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1326-1342.
    19. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    20. Meenal, R. & Selvakumar, A. Immanuel, 2018. "Assessment of SVM, empirical and ANN based solar radiation prediction models with most influencing input parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 324-343.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:495-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.