IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v215y2025ics136403212500293x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated energy system modeling perspectives for future decarbonization pathways based on sector coupling, life-cycle emissions and vehicle-to-grid integration

Author

Listed:
  • Agarwal, Anu
  • Sharma, Tarun

Abstract

The impending environmental crisis has propelled the global energy sector into radical transformation. Variable renewable energy necessitates unprecedented flexibility, transcending energy needs. Decarbonization is critical to achieving sustainable development goals on clean energy and climate action, creating a healthier planet for all. This critical review of current energy system modeling advocates integrated-whole-energy-system models as vital tools for generating diverse energy and policy-related insights. Sector-coupling is investigated, exploring the complex interplay between power, gas, transport, and heating. Nine challenges are delineated: Uncertainty, Renewable integration, Transparency and open-access, High-resolution modeling, Sector-coupling, Flexibility, Technological representation, Life-cycle emissions, and Social and human factors, while offering strategies for their resolution. This review envisions a future powered by renewables, achieving 50 % emissions and 30 % water usage reductions within a decade. The life cycle assessment integration can result in up to 80 % reductions in emissions; however, the cost may increase up to 40–60 %. Emerging technologies like green hydrogen and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) are vital drivers. Green hydrogen offers flexible storage and distribution while V2G transforms electric vehicles into prosumers, enabling grid flexibility and demand management, with studies demonstrating 20–50 % cost reductions and 65 % peak load reduction. A case study for the future decarbonization of the Indian power sector is presented in 19 scenarios based on recent studies, demonstrating the dominant role of solar and wind energy with around 55 % and 22 % share in 2050. This review pinpoints crucial research gaps, identifies successful strategies, and proposes new avenues to guide the energy sector toward a sustainable, low-carbon future.

Suggested Citation

  • Agarwal, Anu & Sharma, Tarun, 2025. "Integrated energy system modeling perspectives for future decarbonization pathways based on sector coupling, life-cycle emissions and vehicle-to-grid integration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s136403212500293x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212500293X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guannan He & Dharik S. Mallapragada & Abhishek Bose & Clara F. Heuberger & Emre Genc{c}er, 2021. "Sector coupling via hydrogen to lower the cost of energy system decarbonization," Papers 2103.03442, arXiv.org.
    2. Wolfgang Glänzel & Henk F. Moed, 2002. "Journal impact measures in bibliometric research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 53(2), pages 171-193, February.
    3. Shinichiro Fujimori & Volker Krey & Detlef Vuuren & Ken Oshiro & Masahiro Sugiyama & Puttipong Chunark & Bundit Limmeechokchai & Shivika Mittal & Osamu Nishiura & Chan Park & Salony Rajbhandari & Dieg, 2021. "A framework for national scenarios with varying emission reductions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(6), pages 472-480, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Angzu & Wang, Leyi & Zhang, Yuhao & Wu, Haoran & Zhang, Huai & Guo, Ru & Wu, Jiang, 2025. "Uncovering the multiple socio-economic driving factors of carbon emissions in nine urban agglomerations of China based on machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    2. Jo Royle & Louisa Coles & Dorothy Williams & Paul Evans, 2007. "Publishing in international journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(1), pages 59-86, April.
    3. Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes & Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2010. "The iceberg hypothesis revisited," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(2), pages 443-461, November.
    4. Jerome K. Vanclay, 2012. "Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(2), pages 211-238, August.
    5. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Flavia Costa, 2023. "Correlating article citedness and journal impact: an empirical investigation by field on a large-scale dataset," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1877-1894, March.
    6. Artemis Chaleplioglou, 2024. "Papers in and Papers out of the Spotlight: Comparative Bibliometric and Altmetrics Analysis of Biomedical Reports with and without News Media Stories," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Eduardo A. Haddad & Jesus P. Mena-Chalco, Otávio J.G. Sidone, 2016. "Produção Científica e Redes de Colaboração dos Docentes Vinculados aos Programas de Pós-graduação em Economia no Brasil," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2016_10, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    8. Mutz, Rüdiger & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2012. "Skewed citation distributions and bias factors: Solutions to two core problems with the journal impact factor," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 169-176.
    9. Wolfgang Glänzel & Henk F. Moed, 2013. "Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 381-394, July.
    10. Cristiano Varin & Manuela Cattelan & David Firth, 2016. "Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(1), pages 1-63, January.
    11. Alesia Zuccala & Peter Besselaar, 2009. "Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 111-122, October.
    12. Tingcan Ma & Gui-Fang Wang & Ke Dong & Mukun Cao, 2012. "The Journal’s Integrated Impact Index: a new indicator for journal evaluation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 649-658, February.
    13. Domingo Docampo & Jean-Jacques Bessoule, 2019. "A new approach to the analysis and evaluation of the research output of countries and institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1207-1225, May.
    14. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Anastasiia Soldatenkova, 2016. "The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists’ publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1711-1724, December.
    15. Li, Feng & Miao, Yajun & Yang, Chenchen, 2015. "How do alumni faculty behave in research collaboration? An analysis of Chang Jiang Scholars in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 438-450.
    16. Lauren A Maggio & Alyssa Jeffrey & Stefanie Haustein & Anita Samuel, 2022. "Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Yurij L. Katchanov & Yulia V. Markova, 2017. "The “space of physics journals”: topological structure and the Journal Impact Factor," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 313-333, October.
    18. Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan, 2008. "Some comments on the journal weighted impact factor proposed by Habibzadeh and Yadollahie," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 369-372.
    19. Guillaume Cabanac, 2012. "Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(5), pages 977-996, May.
    20. Milojević, Staša & Radicchi, Filippo & Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2017. "Citation success index − An intuitive pair-wise journal comparison metric," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 223-231.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s136403212500293x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.