IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v209y2025ics1364032124007688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modified predicted mean vote models for human thermal comfort: An ASHRAE database-based evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Han
  • Hu, Haiyu
  • Wu, Zhiyao
  • Kong, Xiangfei
  • Fan, Man

Abstract

A comprehensive index that is straightforward to implement and reliable is essential for assessing and predicting human thermal comfort, integrating both energy efficiency and Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) considerations. The Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and its associated correction models are extensively utilized to assess human thermal comfort, subsequently informing the design of indoor thermal environments. Hence, this study reviews the evolution of PMV models. Firstly, twenty PMV-modified models are summarized and categorized into four principal categories according to the correction methods. Secondly, the application of common modified models in engineering practice is listed and analyzed. Thirdly, a further evaluation of seven modified models has been conducted using ASHRAE Database I and II. The results demonstrate that PMVe and ePMV are suitable for evaluation in tropical and temperate regions and ePMV has the highest evaluation accuracy among all the discussed models. Finally, three extension directions of the PMV model are proposed to provide ideas for the subsequent revision. The outcomes of this study provide guidance for the appropriate selection and utilization of enhanced PMV models.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Han & Hu, Haiyu & Wu, Zhiyao & Kong, Xiangfei & Fan, Man, 2025. "Modified predicted mean vote models for human thermal comfort: An ASHRAE database-based evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:209:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124007688
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007688
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:209:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124007688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.