IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v186y2023ics1364032123005191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Near real-time predictions of renewable electricity production at substation level via domain adaptation zero-shot learning in sequence

Author

Listed:
  • Teng, S.Y.
  • Cambier van Nooten, C.
  • van Doorn, J.M.
  • Ottenbros, A.
  • Huijbregts, M.A.J.
  • Jansen, J.J.

Abstract

With the urgency of the transition to a resilient low-carbon economy, the monitoring and prediction of regional renewable energy generation over time have become increasingly important. The difficulties of renewable energy data transfer between multiple stakeholders have also caused elevated the need for more trustworthy data analytics within the energy grid. However, only a few voltage transformation facilities in the grid (i.e. substations) contain complete information about the renewable energy generated within the region. A large number of incomplete-information substations with fully-missing renewable energy data limits the analysis and policy-making related to renewable energy. This work studies the potential to transfer information from perfect-information substations to incomplete-information substations with fully-missing renewable energy data. To preserve the practicality of renewable energy prediction, a domain adaptation for zero-shot learning in sequence (DAZLS) strategy is proposed for fully-missing renewable energy prediction in substations. DAZLS is a model agnostic technique which can utilize any base model within its framework for the prediction of renewable energy generation. Using total measured power and weather information (solar irradiation and wind speed) in information-complete substations (8831 timestamps for 10 substations) within the Netherlands, we developed a model to predict solar and wind power from energy producers associated with information incomplete substations via additional real-time weather data, metadata information (e.g. geospatial position, existence and capacity of renewable facilities). Using DAZLS, the average root-mean-squared error for prediction (RMSEP) is 0.07, while that of a default transfer learning model is 0.70. This meant that renewable energy sources in information-incomplete substations could be reliably monitored using weather data, meta-data and physical data, resulting in lesser investment in power meters. This approach was demonstrated for the highest frequency prediction possible in the grid, with a near-real-time frequency of 15 min. Our method can be effectively used for renewable energy grid optimization, planning and analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Teng, S.Y. & Cambier van Nooten, C. & van Doorn, J.M. & Ottenbros, A. & Huijbregts, M.A.J. & Jansen, J.J., 2023. "Near real-time predictions of renewable electricity production at substation level via domain adaptation zero-shot learning in sequence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:186:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123005191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123005191
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiesel, Rüdiger & Paraschiv, Florentina, 2017. "Econometric analysis of 15-minute intraday electricity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-90.
    2. Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng & Jiang, Qingzhe & Zhao, Jun, 2021. "Assessing energy resilience and its greenhouse effect: A global perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Deschatre & Xavier Warin, 2023. "A Common Shock Model for multidimensional electricity intraday price modelling with application to battery valuation," Papers 2307.16619, arXiv.org.
    2. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    3. Abudureheman, Maliyamu & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Cong, 2022. "Spatial effects of dynamic comprehensive energy efficiency on CO2 reduction in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Ocker, Fabian & Jaenisch, Vincent, 2020. "The way towards European electricity intraday auctions – Status quo and future developments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Russo, Marianna & Bertsch, Valentin, 2020. "A looming revolution: Implications of self-generation for the risk exposure of retailers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Katarzyna Maciejowska, 2022. "A portfolio management of a small RES utility with a Structural Vector Autoregressive model of German electricity markets," Papers 2205.00975, arXiv.org.
    7. Katarzyna Maciejowska & Bartosz Uniejewski & Tomasz Serafin, 2020. "PCA Forecast Averaging—Predicting Day-Ahead and Intraday Electricity Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Thomas Deschatre & Pierre Gruet, 2021. "Electricity intraday price modeling with marked Hawkes processes," Papers 2103.07407, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    9. Le, Hong Lam & Ilea, Valentin & Bovo, Cristian, 2019. "Integrated European intra-day electricity market: Rules, modeling and analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 258-273.
    10. Joanna Janczura & Aleksandra Michalak, 2020. "Optimization of Electric Energy Sales Strategy Based on Probabilistic Forecasts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Ge, Tao & Li, Chunying & Li, Jinye & Hao, Xionglei, 2023. "Does neighboring green development benefit or suffer from local economic growth targets? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Russo, Marianna & Kraft, Emil & Bertsch, Valentin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Short-term risk management of electricity retailers under rising shares of decentralized solar generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Uniejewski, Bartosz & Marcjasz, Grzegorz & Weron, Rafał, 2019. "Understanding intraday electricity markets: Variable selection and very short-term price forecasting using LASSO," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1533-1547.
    14. Piccirilli, Marco & Schmeck, Maren Diane & Vargiolu, Tiziano, 2021. "Capturing the power options smile by an additive two-factor model for overlapping futures prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Jan Niklas Buescher & Daria Gottwald & Florian Momm & Alexander Zureck, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis on the Efficiency of European Intraday Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    16. van Leeuwen, Charlotte & Mulder, Machiel, 2018. "Power-to-gas in electricity markets dominated by renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 258-272.
    17. Janczura, Joanna & Wójcik, Edyta, 2022. "Dynamic short-term risk management strategies for the choice of electricity market based on probabilistic forecasts of profit and risk measures. The German and the Polish market case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Maciejowska, Katarzyna & Nitka, Weronika & Weron, Tomasz, 2021. "Enhancing load, wind and solar generation for day-ahead forecasting of electricity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Olivier Féron & Peter Tankov & Laura Tinsi, 2020. "Price Formation and Optimal Trading in Intraday Electricity Markets with a Major Player," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Fred Espen Benth & Marco Piccirilli & Tiziano Vargiolu, 2017. "Additive energy forward curves in a Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework," Papers 1709.03310, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:186:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123005191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.