IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v16y2012i5p3286-3301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential of fungi as category I Consolidated BioProcessing organisms for cellulosic ethanol production

Author

Listed:
  • Amore, Antonella
  • Faraco, Vincenza

Abstract

Consolidated BioProcessing (CBP) can provide an important contribution to reducing ethanol production costs and moving from cellulosic feedstock to fuel ethanol tanks. Several efforts have so far been focused mainly on CBP category II engineering an ethanologen yeast or bacterium to be cellulolytic, but the limited ability of the category II CBP system for producing enzymes for lignocellulose degradation remains a challenge. As an alternative, category I CBP, aimed at engineering a cellulase producer to be ethanologenic, could be pursued, but it is still in its infancy. Some cellulolytic thermophilic bacteria have been described as potential candidates for category I CBP. However, only fungi naturally produce the needed titers of cellulases required for the complete saccharification of pretreated lignocellulose. In this review, potential of cellulolytic fungi as candidates for category I CBP is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Amore, Antonella & Faraco, Vincenza, 2012. "Potential of fungi as category I Consolidated BioProcessing organisms for cellulosic ethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3286-3301.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:16:y:2012:i:5:p:3286-3301
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211200144X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rossana Liguori & Anna Pennacchio & Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe & Addolorata De Chiaro & Leila Birolo & Carlos Ricardo Soccol & Vincenza Faraco, 2021. "Screening of Fungal Strains for Cellulolytic and Xylanolytic Activities Production and Evaluation of Brewers’ Spent Grain as Substrate for Enzyme Production by Selected Fungi," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Troiano, D. & Orsat, V. & Dumont, M.J., 2020. "Status of filamentous fungi in integrated biorefineries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Mendes, Fabrício Bruno & Ibraim Pires Atala, Daniel & Thoméo, João Cláudio, 2017. "Is cellulase production by solid-state fermentation economically attractive for the second generation ethanol production?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 525-533.
    4. Meyer, Pimphan A. & Tews, Iva J. & Magnuson, Jon K. & Karagiosis, Sue A. & Jones, Susanne B., 2013. "Techno-economic analysis of corn stover fungal fermentation to ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 657-668.
    5. Melendez, Jesus R. & Mátyás, Bence & Hena, Sufia & Lowy, Daniel A. & El Salous, Ahmed, 2022. "Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: A review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Aditiya, H.B. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Chong, W.T. & Nur, Hadi & Sebayang, A.H., 2016. "Second generation bioethanol production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 631-653.
    7. Monirul Islam Miskat & Ashfaq Ahmed & Hemal Chowdhury & Tamal Chowdhury & Piyal Chowdhury & Sadiq M. Sait & Young-Kwon Park, 2020. "Assessing the Theoretical Prospects of Bioethanol Production as a Biofuel from Agricultural Residues in Bangladesh: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Avelino Gonçalves, Fabiano & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro, 2015. "Use of cultivars of low cost, agroindustrial and urban waste in the production of cellulosic ethanol in Brazil: A proposal to utilization of microdistillery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1287-1303.
    9. Sean Michael Scully & Johann Orlygsson, 2014. "Recent Advances in Second Generation Ethanol Production by Thermophilic Bacteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, December.
    10. Masum, B.M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Rizwanul Fattah, I.M. & Palash, S.M. & Abedin, M.J., 2013. "Effect of ethanol–gasoline blend on NOx emission in SI engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 209-222.
    11. Carrillo-Nieves, Danay & Rostro Alanís, Magdalena J. & de la Cruz Quiroz, Reynaldo & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Iqbal, Hafiz M.N. & Parra-Saldívar, Roberto, 2019. "Current status and future trends of bioethanol production from agro-industrial wastes in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 63-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:16:y:2012:i:5:p:3286-3301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.