IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v114y2017ipbp525-533.html

Is cellulase production by solid-state fermentation economically attractive for the second generation ethanol production?

Author

Listed:
  • Mendes, Fabrício Bruno
  • Ibraim Pires Atala, Daniel
  • Thoméo, João Cláudio

Abstract

The cost of enzymes for the enzymatic route of the second generation ethanol production is a crucial bottleneck to turn this process into a reality. Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is an environmentally friendly process of enzyme synthesis, although little is known about the costs associated to it. Therefore, this work analyzed economical scenarios of cellulase production by SSF in a pilot plant integrated to both a first and a second generation ethanol processes. The chosen substrate for the enzyme production was composed by sugarcane bagasse and wheat bran, cultivated by the thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora thermophila I-1D3b at 45 °C during 96 h. The estimation of the most important economic indicators showed that the SSF process is economically attractive, due to its easy integration to the main process, and its revenue is up to four fold greater than electricity cogeneration. Economic indicators, such as the internal rate of return (IRR) and payback, were higher than those usually accepted by Brazilian investor in the sucro-energetic sector. Nevertheless, return on investment (ROI) was under than that recommended by the literature. The sensitivity analysis showed strong influence of the enzyme activity on the economic indicators, being the most important parameter for the project profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mendes, Fabrício Bruno & Ibraim Pires Atala, Daniel & Thoméo, João Cláudio, 2017. "Is cellulase production by solid-state fermentation economically attractive for the second generation ethanol production?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 525-533.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:114:y:2017:i:pb:p:525-533
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148117306845
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarkar, Nibedita & Ghosh, Sumanta Kumar & Bannerjee, Satarupa & Aikat, Kaustav, 2012. "Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 19-27.
    2. Amore, Antonella & Faraco, Vincenza, 2012. "Potential of fungi as category I Consolidated BioProcessing organisms for cellulosic ethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3286-3301.
    3. Seabra, Joaquim E.A. & Macedo, Isaias C., 2011. "Comparative analysis for power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 421-428, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. da Silva, Francinaldo Leite & de Oliveira Campos, Alan & dos Santos, Davi Alves & de Oliveira Júnior, Sérgio Dantas & de Araújo Padilha, Carlos Eduardo & de Sousa Junior, Francisco Caninde & de Macedo, 2018. "Pretreatments of Carnauba (Copernicia prunifera) straw residue for production of cellulolytic enzymes by Trichorderma reesei CCT-2768 by solid state fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 299-308.
    2. Mesa, Leyanis & Martínez, Yenisleidy & Celia de Armas, Ana & González, Erenio, 2020. "Ethanol production from sugarcane straw using different configurations of fermentation and techno-economical evaluation of the best schemes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 377-388.
    3. Wang, Lan & Zhou, Yaoyao & Liu, Yang & Chen, Hongzhang, 2021. "N2 periodic pulsation process intensification to improve ethanol productivity in solid state fermentation of steam-exploded corn stalk," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1058-1065.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melendez, Jesus R. & Mátyás, Bence & Hena, Sufia & Lowy, Daniel A. & El Salous, Ahmed, 2022. "Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: A review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Aditiya, H.B. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Chong, W.T. & Nur, Hadi & Sebayang, A.H., 2016. "Second generation bioethanol production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 631-653.
    3. Antunes, F.A.F. & Chandel, A.K. & Brumano, L.P. & Terán Hilares, R. & Peres, G.F.D. & Ayabe, L.E.S. & Sorato, V.S. & Santos, J.R. & Santos, J.C. & Da Silva, S.S., 2018. "A novel process intensification strategy for second-generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse in fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 189-196.
    4. Joshi, Girdhar & Pandey, Jitendra K. & Rana, Sravendra & Rawat, Devendra S., 2017. "Challenges and opportunities for the application of biofuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 850-866.
    5. Bayrakci, Asiye Gül & Koçar, Günnur, 2014. "Second-generation bioethanol production from water hyacinth and duckweed in Izmir: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 306-316.
    6. Abdul Rehman & Luan Jingdong, 2017. "An econometric analysis of major Chinese food crops: An empirical study," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1323372-132, January.
    7. Albarelli, Juliana Q. & Santos, Diego T. & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Marechal, François & Cocero, María J. & Meireles, M. Angela A., 2018. "Product diversification in the sugarcane biorefinery through algae growth and supercritical CO2 extraction: Thermal and economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 776-785.
    8. Fumiaki Takakai & Jota Ichikawa & Masato Ogawa & Saki Ogaya & Kentaro Yasuda & Yukiya Kobayashi & Takashi Sato & Yoshihiro Kaneta & Ken‐ichiro Nagahama, 2017. "Suppression of CH4 Emission by Rice Straw Removal and Application of Bio‐Ethanol Production Residue in a Paddy Field in Akita, Japan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Yu, Jianming & Chen, Sitong & Yu, Yang & Zhang, Chengcheng & Jin, Mingjie, 2024. "Influence of feedstock selection on cellulosic ethanol production based on densified biomass with calcium hydroxide and regular steam pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    12. Hongkun Li & Meijia Dou & Xinyu Wang & Na Guo & Ping Kou & Jiao Jiao & Yujie Fu, 2021. "Optimization of Cellulase Production by a Novel Endophytic Fungus Penicillium oxalicum R4 Isolated from Taxus cuspidata," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Demiray, Ekin & Karatay, Sevgi Ertuğrul & Dönmez, Gönül, 2018. "Evaluation of pomegranate peel in ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 988-994.
    14. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Assar, Hossein Alizadeh & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Potential of biofuel production from pistachio waste in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    16. Taheri, Nima & Jahani, Hamed & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2024. "Modeling sustainable bioethanol supply chain in Australia: A system dynamics approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    17. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Awad, Faisal N. & Qi, Xianghui & Sahu, J.N., 2019. "Recent advances in biological pretreatment of microalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-128.
    19. Sahar Safarian & Sorena Sattari & Runar Unnthorsson & Zeinab Hamidzadeh, 2019. "Prioritization of Bioethanol Production Systems from Agricultural and Waste Agricultural Biomass Using Multi-criteria Decision Making," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Zhang, Jiaqi & Li, Yu'e & Cai, Andong & Oosterveer, Peter & Greene, Mary & Wang, Bin, 2023. "Greenhouse gas reduction through crop residue-based bioenergy: A meta-analysis of reduction efficiency and abatement costs of various products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:114:y:2017:i:pb:p:525-533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.