IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v162y2022ics1364032122003938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical challenges in floating offshore wind turbine upscaling: A critical analysis based on the NREL 5 MW and IEA 15 MW Reference Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Papi, F.
  • Bianchini, A.

Abstract

Upscaling is currently seen as one of the most promising techniques to lower the Levelized Cost of Energy of wind farms and is a trend that has been ongoing for many years. Floating wind turbines are still a quite novel technology. In this kind of application, the benefits of upscaling are potentially even greater than those that can be seen in land-based turbines, with a direct impact not only on the turbine cost per installed kW, but also on that of the floater, mooring lines and ancillaries. In this study, a critical analysis on the technical implications of upscaling is carried out, focusing on aero-hydro-servo-elastic design. The study is based on the NREL 5 MW and IEA 15 MW Reference wind turbines in floating configuration; while the two turbines benefit from different design choices and technical maturity, they are well-known, open-access test cases and present several similarities. Both turbines use the same controller, and both are placed on a semi-submersible type floater. The mooring line designs are also conceptually identical, with both turbines being anchored to the seabed trough three 120° apart slack catenary lines. The numerical tools used to simulate the wind turbines are also the same: Blade Element Momentum (BEM)-based aerodynamics in combination with second order potential flow derived hydrodynamics. Such approaches are found in the state-of-the-art code OpenFAST®, which is used in the present analysis. The two floating wind turbines are tested in a series of identical sea and inflow conditions (i.e., analogous to the wind farm design process for a given authorized sea region) with varying degrees of severity. Results show how overall performance and rotor loads are only marginally affected by floating installation. When looking at tower loads, however, it is shown who platform motions affect extreme power-production loads significantly. In this regard, the two machines are closely matched and despite the increased stability of the larger floating platform, some ultimate loads tend to increase more on the IEA 15 MW.

Suggested Citation

  • Papi, F. & Bianchini, A., 2022. "Technical challenges in floating offshore wind turbine upscaling: A critical analysis based on the NREL 5 MW and IEA 15 MW Reference Turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122003938
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122003938
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Zhiyu, 2021. "Installation of offshore wind turbines: A technical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Giulio Ferri & Enzo Marino & Claudio Borri, 2020. "Optimal Dimensions of a Semisubmersible Floating Platform for a 10 MW Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Ryan Wiser & Karen Jenni & Joachim Seel & Erin Baker & Maureen Hand & Eric Lantz & Aaron Smith, 2016. "Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(10), pages 1-8, October.
    4. Bento, Nuno & Fontes, Margarida, 2019. "Emergence of floating offshore wind energy: Technology and industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 66-82.
    5. Shah, Kamran Ali & Meng, Fantai & Li, Ye & Nagamune, Ryozo & Zhou, Yarong & Ren, Zhengru & Jiang, Zhiyu, 2021. "A synthesis of feasible control methods for floating offshore wind turbine system dynamics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Liu, Yichao & Li, Sunwei & Yi, Qian & Chen, Daoyi, 2016. "Developments in semi-submersible floating foundations supporting wind turbines: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 433-449.
    7. Shields, Matt & Beiter, Philipp & Nunemaker, Jake & Cooperman, Aubryn & Duffy, Patrick, 2021. "Impacts of turbine and plant upsizing on the levelized cost of energy for offshore wind," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    8. Ren, Zhengru & Verma, Amrit Shankar & Li, Ye & Teuwen, Julie J.E. & Jiang, Zhiyu, 2021. "Offshore wind turbine operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Subbulakshmi, A. & Verma, Mohit & Keerthana, M. & Sasmal, Saptarshi & Harikrishna, P. & Kapuria, Santosh, 2022. "Recent advances in experimental and numerical methods for dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines — An integrated review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Zhang, Lijun & Li, Ye & Xu, Wenhao & Gao, Zhiteng & Fang, Long & Li, Rongfu & Ding, Boyin & Zhao, Bin & Leng, Jun & He, Fenglan, 2022. "Systematic analysis of performance and cost of two floating offshore wind turbines with significant interactions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    3. Hosius, Emil & Seebaß, Johann V. & Wacker, Benjamin & Schlüter, Jan Chr., 2023. "The impact of offshore wind energy on Northern European wholesale electricity prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    4. Meng, Fantai & Sergiienko, Nataliia & Ding, Boyin & Zhou, Binzhen & Silva, Leandro Souza Pinheiro Da & Cazzolato, Benjamin & Li, Ye, 2023. "Co-located offshore wind–wave energy systems: Can motion suppression and reliable power generation be achieved simultaneously?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    5. Mousavi, Yashar & Bevan, Geraint & Kucukdemiral, Ibrahim Beklan & Fekih, Afef, 2022. "Sliding mode control of wind energy conversion systems: Trends and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Truong, Hoai Vu Anh & Dang, Tri Dung & Vo, Cong Phat & Ahn, Kyoung Kwan, 2022. "Active control strategies for system enhancement and load mitigation of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Wang, Xinbao & Cai, Chang & Cai, Shang-Gui & Wang, Tengyuan & Wang, Zekun & Song, Juanjuan & Rong, Xiaomin & Li, Qing'an, 2023. "A review of aerodynamic and wake characteristics of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Jiang, Zhiyu & Yang, Limin & Gao, Zhen & Moan, Torgeir, 2022. "Integrated dynamic analysis of a spar floating wind turbine with a hydraulic drivetrain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 608-623.
    9. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Grant, Elenya & Johnson, Kathryn & Damiani, Rick & Phadnis, Mandar & Pao, Lucy, 2023. "Buoyancy can ballast control for increased power generation of a floating offshore wind turbine with a light-weight semi-submersible platform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    11. Upma Singh & Mohammad Rizwan & Hasmat Malik & Fausto Pedro García Márquez, 2022. "Wind Energy Scenario, Success and Initiatives towards Renewable Energy in India—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-39, March.
    12. Pustina, L. & Lugni, C. & Bernardini, G. & Serafini, J. & Gennaretti, M., 2020. "Control of power generated by a floating offshore wind turbine perturbed by sea waves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Xiaoxun, Zhu & Xinyu, Hang & Xiaoxia, Gao & Xing, Yang & Zixu, Xu & Yu, Wang & Huaxin, Liu, 2022. "Research on crack detection method of wind turbine blade based on a deep learning method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    14. Pustina, L. & Serafini, J. & Pasquali, C. & Solero, L. & Lidozzi, A. & Gennaretti, M., 2023. "A novel resonant controller for sea-induced rotor blade vibratory loads reduction on floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Ferri, Giulio & Marino, Enzo, 2023. "Site-specific optimizations of a 10 MW floating offshore wind turbine for the Mediterranean Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 921-941.
    16. Srikanth Bashetty & Selahattin Ozcelik, 2021. "Review on Dynamics of Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.
    17. Majidi Nezhad, Meysam & Neshat, Mehdi & Piras, Giuseppe & Astiaso Garcia, Davide, 2022. "Sites exploring prioritisation of offshore wind energy potential and mapping for wind farms installation: Iranian islands case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Vincent F. Yu & Thi Huynh Anh Le & Tai-Sheng Su & Shih-Wei Lin, 2021. "Optimal Maintenance Policy for Offshore Wind Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Tjaberings, Jorick & Fazi, Stefano & Ursavas, Evrim, 2022. "Evaluating operational strategies for the installation of offshore wind turbine substructures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Farid Khazaeli Moghadam & Nils Desch, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Various PMSG-Based Drivetrain Concepts for 15 MW Offshore Wind Turbines Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122003938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.