IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v15y2011i7p3388-3398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An overview of the biomass resource potential of Norway for bioenergy use

Author

Listed:
  • Scarlat, Nicolae
  • Dallemand, Jean-Francois
  • Skjelhaugen, Odd Jarle
  • Asplund, Dan
  • Nesheim, Lars

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the Norwegian biomass resources for bioenergy use, bioenergy market and frame conditions through a comparison with Denmark, Finland and Sweden, which have a leading role in bioenergy production in the European Union. Although the contribution of renewable energy in Norway is among the highest in Europe (58%), mainly due to hydroelectricity, bioenergy has a low contribution to Norwegian energy supply (6%). As the experience from the other EU Member States showed, long-term, stable policies and relatively strong incentives are needed to initiate and build up a bioenergy market. In Norway, there is still a significant available potential for increasing the bioenergy contribution to the energy supply. The abundance and relatively low prices of energy (i.e. fossil fuels and electricity), in connection with the need of high investment costs, did not favour so far bioenergy production. Additional forest biomass may be mobilized in Norway by more intensive management of currently exploited forests. However, there are several limitations related to topography, accessibility and economics. The biomass resources and the full range of technologies available for heat or electricity generation both at small and large scale that can provide good opportunities for increased bioenergy production. The experience gained in Denmark, Finland and Sweden may be relevant for Norway, as well as for other EU Member States, where there is a deficit of mobilization of biomass resources and insufficient industrial integration of bioenergy with other forest-based sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-Francois & Skjelhaugen, Odd Jarle & Asplund, Dan & Nesheim, Lars, 2011. "An overview of the biomass resource potential of Norway for bioenergy use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(7), pages 3388-3398, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:7:p:3388-3398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032111001729
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henke, Hauke T.J. & Gardumi, Francesco & Howells, Mark, 2022. "The open source electricity Model Base for Europe - An engagement framework for open and transparent European energy modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    2. Kütt, Lauri & Millar, John & Karttunen, Antti & Lehtonen, Matti & Karppinen, Maarit, 2018. "Thermoelectric applications for energy harvesting in domestic applications and micro-production units. Part I: Thermoelectric concepts, domestic boilers and biomass stoves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 519-544.
    3. Yao, Yiqing & Zhou, Jianye & An, Lizhe & Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Chen, Shulin & Qiu, Ling, 2018. "Role of soil in improving process performance and methane yield of anaerobic digestion with corn straw as substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 998-1006.
    4. Zakeri, Behnam & Syri, Sanna & Rinne, Samuli, 2015. "Higher renewable energy integration into the existing energy system of Finland – Is there any maximum limit?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 244-259.
    5. Turetta, Ana Paula Dias & Kuyper, Thomas & Malheiros, Tadeu Fabrício & Coutinho, Heitor Luiz da Costa, 2017. "A framework proposal for sustainability assessment of sugarcane in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 597-603.
    6. Fazeli, Reza & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Hallgrimsson, Jonas Hlynur, 2016. "Residential energy demand for space heating in the Nordic countries: Accounting for interfuel substitution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1210-1226.
    7. Algieri, Angelo & Andiloro, Serafina & Tamburino, Vincenzo & Zema, Demetrio Antonio, 2019. "The potential of agricultural residues for energy production in Calabria (Southern Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Mohammadi, Ali & Rafiee, Shahin & Jafari, Ali & Keyhani, Alireza & Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Nonhebel, Sanderine, 2014. "Energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of farming systems in north Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 724-733.
    9. Jacqueline Adelowo & Mathias Mier & Christoph Weissbart, 2021. "Taxation of Carbon Emissions and Air Pollution in Intertemporal Optimization Frameworks with Social and Private Discount Rates," ifo Working Paper Series 360, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    10. Shi, Yan & Ge, Ying & Chang, Jie & Shao, Hongbo & Tang, Yuli, 2013. "Garden waste biomass for renewable and sustainable energy production in China: Potential, challenges and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 432-437.
    11. Xin-Gang, Zhao & Tian-Tian, Feng & Yu, Ma & Yi-Sheng, Yang & Xue-Fu, Pan, 2015. "Analysis on investment strategies in China: the case of biomass direct combustion power generation sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 760-772.
    12. Cavicchi, Bianca & Bryden, John M. & Vittuari, Matteo, 2014. "A comparison of bioenergy policies and institutional frameworks in the rural areas of Emilia Romagna and Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 355-363.
    13. Chowdhury, Mohammad Shyfur Rahman & Azad, A.K. & Karim, Md. Rezwanul & Naser, Jamal & Bhuiyan, Arafat A., 2019. "Reduction of GHG emissions by utilizing biomass co-firing in a swirl-stabilized furnace," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1201-1209.
    14. Halaj, Daniel & Brodrechtova, Yvonne, 2018. "Marketing decision making in the forest biomass market: The case of Austria, Finland and Slovakia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 201-209.
    15. Li, Y. & Zhou, L.W. & Wang, R.Z., 2017. "Urban biomass and methods of estimating municipal biomass resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1017-1030.
    16. Agbor, Ezinwa & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2014. "A review of biomass co-firing in North America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 930-943.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:7:p:3388-3398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.