IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v82y2015icp77-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: Kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model

Author

Listed:
  • Adeyemi, Idowu
  • Janajreh, Isam

Abstract

In this study, the entrained flow gasification (EFG) of Kentucky coal and wood waste had been investigated using detailed kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model and experimental diagnostics. The experimental investigation was conducted in the air-blown atmospheric drop tube experimental facility furnace. The exit gas composition at different equivalence ratios was obtained to validate the developed ASPEN Plus model. In addition, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the char were observed along the gasifier to determine the behavior of the feedstock subjected to gasification and to select proper char gasification models. The model takes into account the passive heating through moisture release, devolatilization, volatile combustion and char gasification. It made the investigation of the gasification process and running sensitivity studies practically feasible as current equilibrium and high fidelity coupled thermo-chemical-flow models are insufficient or pertaining much complexity to use. The model compares reasonably well with the experimental data obtained in this work and is been used to carry out sensitivity study. A rise in the diameter and height sizes lead to an increase in the mole fraction of CO and H2 throughout the length of the gasifier, an opposite trend was observed for the CO2 and H2O composition. It was also observed that the mole fraction of the syngas was lower for the biomass waste compared to the baseline coal as this is attributed to the higher oxygen content (43.62%) and lower carbon content (49.41%) of the waste biomass compared to coal.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeyemi, Idowu & Janajreh, Isam, 2015. "Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: Kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 77-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:82:y:2015:i:c:p:77-84
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114007137
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pérez-Fortes, M. & Bojarski, A.D. & Velo, E. & Nougués, J.M. & Puigjaner, L., 2009. "Conceptual model and evaluation of generated power and emissions in an IGCC plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1721-1732.
    2. Bellomare, Filippo & Rokni, Masoud, 2013. "Integration of a municipal solid waste gasification plant with solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 490-500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aghaalikhani, Arash & Schmid, Johannes C. & Borello, Domenico & Fuchs, Joseph & Benedikt, Florian & Hofbauer, Herman & Rispoli, Franco & Henriksen, Ulrick B. & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Cedola, Luca, 2019. "Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 703-718.
    2. Jhulimar Castro & Jonathan Leaver & Shusheng Pang, 2022. "Simulation and Techno-Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Biomass Gasification-Based Processes: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-37, November.
    3. Lozano, E.M. & Pedersen, T.H. & Rosendahl, L.A., 2019. "Modeling of thermochemically liquefied biomass products and heat of formation for process energy assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    4. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    5. Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Syngas production strategies from biomass gasification: Numerical studies for operational conditions and quality indexes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1211-1221.
    6. Ziółkowski, Paweł & Stasiak, Kamil & Amiri, Milad & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Negative carbon dioxide gas power plant integrated with gasification of sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    7. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    8. Šuhaj, Patrik & Husár, Jakub & Haydary, Juma & Annus, Július, 2022. "Experimental verification of a pilot pyrolysis/split product gasification (PSPG) unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    9. HajiHashemi, MohammadSina & Mazhkoo, Shahin & Dadfar, Hossein & Livani, Ehsan & Naseri Varnosefaderani, Aliakbar & Pourali, Omid & Najafi Nobar, Shima & Dutta, Animesh, 2023. "Combined heat and power production in a pilot-scale biomass gasification system: Experimental study and kinetic simulation using ASPEN Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. Kaushal, Priyanka & Tyagi, Rakesh, 2017. "Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 629-636.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Xinyue & Chen, Heng & Zheng, Qiwei & Liu, Jun & Pan, Peiyuan & Xu, Gang & Zhao, Qinxin & Jiang, Xue, 2023. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel hydrogen production system using medical waste and biogas with zero carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Dutta, Rohan & Ghosh, Parthasarathi & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2011. "Customization and validation of a commercial process simulator for dynamic simulation of Helium liquefier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3204-3214.
    3. Li, Sheng & Jin, Hongguang & Gao, Lin, 2013. "Cogeneration of substitute natural gas and power from coal by moderate recycle of the chemical unconverted gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 658-667.
    4. Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a system with biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 19-31.
    5. Li, Jinhu & Ye, Xinhao & Burra, Kiran G. & Lu, Wei & Wang, Zhiwei & Liu, Xuan & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2023. "Synergistic effects during co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of polypropylene and polystyrene," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    6. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Lv, Liping & He, Jingling, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of SNG and power polygeneration with the goal of zero CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-46.
    7. He, Chang & Feng, Xiao & Chu, Khim Hoong, 2013. "Process modeling and thermodynamic analysis of Lurgi fixed-bed coal gasifier in an SNG plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 742-757.
    8. Luis Puigjaner & Mar Pérez-Fortes & José M. Laínez-Aguirre, 2015. "Towards a Carbon-Neutral Energy Sector: Opportunities and Challenges of Coordinated Bioenergy Supply Chains-A PSE Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-48, June.
    9. Zhang, Jifu & Cui, Peizhe & Yang, Sheng & Zhou, Yaru & Du, Wei & Wang, Yinglong & Deng, Chengwei & Wang, Shuai, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of SOFC–CCHP system based on municipal sludge plasma gasification with carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    10. Kong, Mengdi & Ye, Xuemin & Liu, Di & Li, Chunxi, 2024. "Comprehensive evaluation of medical waste gasification low-carbon multi-generation system based on AHP–EWM–GFCE method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    11. Judith M. Schicks & Erik Spangenberg & Ronny Giese & Bernd Steinhauer & Jens Klump & Manja Luzi, 2011. "New Approaches for the Production of Hydrocarbons from Hydrate Bearing Sediments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Mallah, Subhash & Bansal, N.K., 2010. "Nuclear and clean coal technology options for sustainable development in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3031-3039.
    13. Mores, Patricia & Scenna, Nicolás & Mussati, Sergio, 2012. "CO2 capture using monoethanolamine (MEA) aqueous solution: Modeling and optimization of the solvent regeneration and CO2 desorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1042-1058.
    14. Alvaro Fernandes & Joerg Brabandt & Oliver Posdziech & Ali Saadabadi & Mayra Recalde & Liyuan Fan & Eva O. Promes & Ming Liu & Theo Woudstra & Purushothaman Vellayan Aravind, 2018. "Design, Construction, and Testing of a Gasifier-Specific Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Wu, Chuang & Yan, Xiao-jiang & Wang, Shun-sen & Bai, Kun-lun & Di, Juan & Cheng, Shang-fang & Li, Jun, 2016. "System optimisation and performance analysis of CO2 transcritical power cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 391-400.
    16. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    17. Casas Ledón, Yannay & González, Patricia & Concha, Scarlett & Zaror, Claudio A. & Arteaga-Pérez, Luis E., 2016. "Exergoeconomic valuation of a waste-based integrated combined cycle (WICC) for heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 239-252.
    18. Bhattacharya, Abhishek & Manna, Dulal & Paul, Bireswar & Datta, Amitava, 2011. "Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power generation with supplementary biomass firing: Energy and exergy based performance analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2599-2610.
    19. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Budnik, Michał & Ziębik, Andrzej, 2013. "Comparison of IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and CFB (circulating fluidized bed) cogeneration plants equipped with CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 86-96.
    20. Hossam A. Gabbar & Mohamed Aboughaly & Stefano Russo, 2017. "Conceptual Design and Energy Analysis of Integrated Combined Cycle Gasification System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:82:y:2015:i:c:p:77-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.