IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v242y2025ics0960148125000187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional outlooks of biomass potential for transport sector energy security

Author

Listed:
  • Akhtar Usmani, Rahil
  • Khan, Akram A.

Abstract

This study investigates geographical potential of biomass for contribution to the energy security of the transport sector. To precisely determine the extent of contribution, which is mapped to two different scales, i.e., bioenergy and biofuel. The analysis considers lignocellulosic biomass available across the six continents. The biomass quantity from agrarian residues is estimated using the RPR method, while the waste factor method is employed for wood residues. Factors such as competing uses, sustainability and moisture content are considered, and the appropriate amount of biomass has been discounted. The analysis is performed under three biomass availability scenarios and two biofuel yield scenarios that generate a total of nine cases, three for energy and six for biofuel. The dual approach of the study, with extensive geographical coverage, distinguishes it from prior studies. The findings indicate that biomass-to-bioenergy conversion is inefficient, while biomass-to-biofuel conversion shows measurable contributions to energy security. The biofuel potential under scenario A2H2 is almost sufficient to cover the gasoline demand in all regions except North America. This signifies that North America is the only biomass-deficient region in terms of biofuel requirements. That creates opportunities for feedstock trade from areas of surplus biomass to North America, potentially generating substantial economic gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhtar Usmani, Rahil & Khan, Akram A., 2025. "Regional outlooks of biomass potential for transport sector energy security," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:242:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125000187
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.122356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125000187
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Usmani, Rahil Akhtar, 2020. "Potential for energy and biofuel from biomass in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 921-930.
    2. Muth, D.J. & Bryden, K.M. & Nelson, R.G., 2013. "Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 403-417.
    3. Aui, A. & Wang, Y. & Mba-Wright, M., 2021. "Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergii Kyryzyuk & Vitaliy Krupin & Olena Borodina & Adam Wąs, 2020. "Crop Residue Removal: Assessment of Future Bioenergy Generation Potential and Agro-Environmental Limitations Based on a Case Study of Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Toka, Agorasti & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum & Grigoriadou, Anastasia-Loukia, 2014. "Managing the diffusion of biomass in the residential energy sector: An illustrative real-world case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 56-69.
    3. Zhang, Ping & Zhuo, La & Li, Meng & Liu, Yilin & Wu, Pute, 2023. "Assessment of advanced bioethanol potential under water and land resource constraints in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 359-371.
    4. Cervi, Walter Rossi & Lamparelli, Rubens Augusto Camargo & Seabra, Joaquim Eugênio Abel & Junginger, Martin & van der Hilst, Floor, 2020. "Spatial assessment of the techno-economic potential of bioelectricity production from sugarcane straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1313-1324.
    5. Aui, Alvina & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Post-RFS supports for cellulosic ethanol: Evaluation of economic and environmental impacts of alternative policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Prabodh Illukpitiya & Firuz Yuldashev & Kabirat Nasiru, 2022. "Designing Harvesting and Hauling Cost Models for Energy Cane Production for Biorefineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Zhang, Bingquan & Xu, Jialu & Lin, Zhixian & Lin, Tao & Faaij, André P.C., 2021. "Spatially explicit analyses of sustainable agricultural residue potential for bioenergy in China under various soil and land management scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Karan, Shivesh Kishore & Hamelin, Lorie, 2020. "Crop residues are a key feedstock to bioeconomy but available methods for their estimation are highly uncertain," Earth Arxiv ds8v4, Center for Open Science.
    9. Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Anastasija Novikova & Kęstutis Romaneckas, 2019. "Straw Stocks as a Source of Renewable Energy. A Case Study of a District in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Gojiya, Anil & Deb, Dipankar & Iyer, Kannan K.R., 2019. "Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 416-425.
    11. Douvartzides, Savvas & Charisiou, Nikolaos D. & Wang, Wen & Papadakis, Vagelis G. & Polychronopoulou, Kyriaki & Goula, Maria A., 2022. "Catalytic fast pyrolysis of agricultural residues and dedicated energy crops for the production of high energy density transportation biofuels. Part I: Chemical pathways and bio-oil upgrading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 483-505.
    12. Ian J. Bonner & Kara G. Cafferty & David J. Muth & Mark D. Tomer & David E. James & Sarah A. Porter & Douglas L. Karlen, 2014. "Opportunities for Energy Crop Production Based on Subfield Scale Distribution of Profitability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Fulton, Lew & Morrison, Geoff & Parker, Nathan & Witcover, Julie & Sperling, Dan, 2014. "Three Routes Forward For Biofuels: Incremental, Transitional, and Leapfrog," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3pp0g4fb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Ashraf Elfasakhany, 2021. "State of Art of Using Biofuels in Spark Ignition Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Gabrielle M. Myers & Daniel S. Andersen & Bobby J. Martens & D. Raj Raman, 2023. "Cost Assessment of Centralizing Swine Manure and Corn Stover Co-Digestion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Nguyen, Trung H. & Granger, Julien & Pandya, Deval & Paustian, Keith, 2019. "High-resolution multi-objective optimization of feedstock landscape design for hybrid first and second generation biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1484-1496.
    17. Liu, Tingting & McConkey, Brian & Huffman, Ted & Smith, Stephen & MacGregor, Bob & Yemshanov, Denys & Kulshreshtha, Suren, 2014. "Potential and impacts of renewable energy production from agricultural biomass in Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 222-229.
    18. Piyarath Saosee & Boonrod Sajjakulnukit & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Feedstock Security Analysis for Wood Pellet Production in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Saha, Mithun & Eckelman, Matthew J., 2015. "Geospatial assessment of potential bioenergy crop production on urban marginal land," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 540-547.
    20. Muench, Stefan & Guenther, Edeltraud, 2013. "A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-273.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:242:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125000187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.