IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v199y2022icp1408-1423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on investment planning of power-hydrogen system considering the multi-stakeholder benefit

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Mengshu
  • Huang, Yuansheng

Abstract

As the penetration of renewable energy sources continues to increase, the stability of the grid is being challenged. Solutions are needed to curb fluctuations in renewable energy generation and ensure a stable electricity supply. As a clean and efficient secondary energy source, hydrogen energy plays an important role in the power system. However, the development of hydrogen energy storage systems is currently limited by technology and costs, making it difficult to scale up. How to invest to make hydrogen storage economical is worth studying. This paper constructs a regional microgrid system, considering the economics of investment by renewable energy generators (REGs) and integrated energy operators (IEOs), and the sensitivity of the payback period under conditions of market adjustment and technological progress. A combination of the Gurobi and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm is used to solve the investment optimization model, and Shapley is used to allocate multi-intelligence benefits. The results show that: (1) the investment returns and payback periods of REG are within a reasonable range; (2) IEO is hardly economical in the presence of market price changes and technological advances. On this basis, this paper constructs a win-win investment model for REG and IEO and explores the distribution of benefits under their cooperation model. The results show an increase in return on investment of 0.34% for REG and 1% for IEO following investments by REG in partnership with IEO.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Mengshu & Huang, Yuansheng, 2022. "Research on investment planning of power-hydrogen system considering the multi-stakeholder benefit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1408-1423.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:199:y:2022:i:c:p:1408-1423
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122013313
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guannan He & Dharik S. Mallapragada & Abhishek Bose & Clara F. Heuberger & Emre Genc{c}er, 2021. "Sector coupling via hydrogen to lower the cost of energy system decarbonization," Papers 2103.03442, arXiv.org.
    2. Firtina-Ertis, Irem & Acar, Canan & Erturk, Ercan, 2020. "Optimal sizing design of an isolated stand-alone hybrid wind-hydrogen system for a zero-energy house," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    3. Lund, Peter D. & Lindgren, Juuso & Mikkola, Jani & Salpakari, Jyri, 2015. "Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 785-807.
    4. Nastasi, Benedetto & Mazzoni, Stefano & Groppi, Daniele & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Astiaso Garcia, Davide, 2021. "Optimized integration of Hydrogen technologies in Island energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 850-864.
    5. Pan, Guangsheng & Gu, Wei & Qiu, Haifeng & Lu, Yuping & Zhou, Suyang & Wu, Zhi, 2020. "Bi-level mixed-integer planning for electricity-hydrogen integrated energy system considering levelized cost of hydrogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    6. Furat Dawood & GM Shafiullah & Martin Anda, 2020. "Stand-Alone Microgrid with 100% Renewable Energy: A Case Study with Hybrid Solar PV-Battery-Hydrogen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Hernandez, Drake D. & Gençer, Emre, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of balancing California’s power system on a seasonal basis: Hydrogen vs. lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    8. Shi, Mengshu & Wang, Weiye & Han, Yaxuan & Huang, Yuansheng, 2022. "Research on comprehensive benefit of hydrogen storage in microgrid system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 621-635.
    9. Wang, Gang & Chao, Yuechao & Chen, Zeshao, 2021. "Promoting developments of hydrogen powered vehicle and solar PV hydrogen production in China: A study based on evolutionary game theory method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javed, Muhammad Shahzad & Jurasz, Jakub & McPherson, Madeleine & Dai, Yanjun & Ma, Tao, 2022. "Quantitative evaluation of renewable-energy-based remote microgrids: curtailment, load shifting, and reliability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Renewable smart energy network: A thermoeconomic comparison between conventional lithium-ion batteries and reversible solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 74-95.
    3. Vallianos, Charalampos & Candanedo, José & Athienitis, Andreas, 2023. "Application of a large smart thermostat dataset for model calibration and Model Predictive Control implementation in the residential sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    4. Bruno Cárdenas & Lawrie Swinfen-Styles & James Rouse & Seamus D. Garvey, 2021. "Short-, Medium-, and Long-Duration Energy Storage in a 100% Renewable Electricity Grid: A UK Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Jenkins, J.D. & Zhou, Z. & Ponciroli, R. & Vilim, R.B. & Ganda, F. & de Sisternes, F. & Botterud, A., 2018. "The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 872-884.
    7. Arjuna Nebel & Christine Krüger & Tomke Janßen & Mathieu Saurat & Sebastian Kiefer & Karin Arnold, 2020. "Comparison of the Effects of Industrial Demand Side Management and Other Flexibilities on the Performance of the Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Soha, Tamás & Munkácsy, Béla & Harmat, Ádám & Csontos, Csaba & Horváth, Gergely & Tamás, László & Csüllög, Gábor & Daróczi, Henriett & Sáfián, Fanni & Szabó, Mária, 2017. "GIS-based assessment of the opportunities for small-scale pumped hydro energy storage in middle-mountain areas focusing on artificial landscape features," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1363-1373.
    9. Pusceddu, Elian & Zakeri, Behnam & Castagneto Gissey, Giorgio, 2021. "Synergies between energy arbitrage and fast frequency response for battery energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Polleux, Louis & Guerassimoff, Gilles & Marmorat, Jean-Paul & Sandoval-Moreno, John & Schuhler, Thierry, 2022. "An overview of the challenges of solar power integration in isolated industrial microgrids with reliability constraints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Zhiming Lu & Youting Li & Guying Zhuo & Chuanbo Xu, 2023. "Configuration Optimization of Hydrogen-Based Multi-Microgrid Systems under Electricity Market Trading and Different Hydrogen Production Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Mariia Kozlova & Alena Lohrmann, 2021. "Steering Renewable Energy Investments in Favor of Energy System Reliability: A Call for a Hybrid Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Rovick Tarife & Yosuke Nakanishi & Yicheng Zhou & Noel Estoperez & Anacita Tahud, 2023. "Integrated GIS and Fuzzy-AHP Framework for Suitability Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: A Case in Southern Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Michael Schoepf & Martin Weibelzahl & Lisa Nowka, 2018. "The Impact of Substituting Production Technologies on the Economic Demand Response Potential in Industrial Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Vašak, Mario & Banjac, Anita & Hure, Nikola & Novak, Hrvoje & Kovačević, Marko, 2023. "Predictive control based assessment of building demand flexibility in fixed time windows," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    16. Weitzel, Timm & Glock, Christoph H., 2018. "Energy management for stationary electric energy storage systems: A systematic literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 582-606.
    17. Neda Hajibandeh & Mehdi Ehsan & Soodabeh Soleymani & Miadreza Shafie-khah & João P. S. Catalão, 2017. "The Mutual Impact of Demand Response Programs and Renewable Energies: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Berjawi, A.E.H. & Walker, S.L. & Patsios, C. & Hosseini, S.H.R., 2021. "An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: A whole energy systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. Andrychowicz, Mateusz & Olek, Blazej & Przybylski, Jakub, 2017. "Review of the methods for evaluation of renewable energy sources penetration and ramping used in the Scenario Outlook and Adequacy Forecast 2015. Case study for Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 703-714.
    20. Jahangiri, Mehdi & Rezaei, Mostafa & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Goojani, Afsaneh Raiesi & Saghaei, Hamed & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin, 2022. "Prioritization of solar electricity and hydrogen co-production stations considering PV losses and different types of solar trackers: A TOPSIS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 889-903.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:199:y:2022:i:c:p:1408-1423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.