IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v193y2022icp57-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of uncertainties in positioning of PIV plane on validation of CFD results of a high-head Francis turbine model

Author

Listed:
  • Salehi, Saeed
  • Nilsson, Håkan

Abstract

The use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for the design of modern hydraulic turbines has increased and matured significantly in the last decades. More recently, CFD is also used to understand how to safely widen the hydraulic turbine operating ranges, and avoid hazardous conditions during transient operation. The accuracy of such CFD results relies on validation with experimental data which contains numerous sources of uncertainties. The present work is focusing on the effects of the uncertainties in the positioning of the experimental Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) plane on the validation of CFD results of the high-head Francis-99 turbine model. A transient shutdown sequence is considered, where the available experimental and numerical data are considered accurate according to a conventional thorough validation procedure. A part of that validation procedure is the comparison of spatially and temporally varying velocity profiles along three lines of the experimental PIV plane. The positioning of this PIV plane is here considered uncertain, using three translational and three rotational stochastic parameters with uniform probability distribution functions. The validated CFD results are used to extract the data that depends on these uncertainties, while this is not possible for the experimental data. The polynomial chaos expansion method is employed for the Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) study while Sobol’ indices are utilized for the Sensitivity Analysis (SA). The UQ can be used to show how the considered uncertainties impact the extracted components of the velocity field, and the sensitivity analysis reveals the relative contribution of each uncertain parameter to the quantity of interest. For this particular case it is shown that the so-called horizontal velocity component is most sensitive to the plane-normal positioning of the PIV plane. This is also the velocity component where all the numerical results found in the literature differ most from the experimental results. It is also shown that the probability distribution function of the numerical horizontal velocity is covered by the experimental standard deviation bounds, which means that it is quantified that the numerical and experimental results are similar within the range of the uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Salehi, Saeed & Nilsson, Håkan, 2022. "Effects of uncertainties in positioning of PIV plane on validation of CFD results of a high-head Francis turbine model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 57-75.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:193:y:2022:i:c:p:57-75
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122004797
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdallah, I. & Natarajan, A. & Sørensen, J.D., 2015. "Impact of uncertainty in airfoil characteristics on wind turbine extreme loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 283-300.
    2. Sun, Longgang & Guo, Pengcheng & Yan, Jianguo, 2021. "Transient analysis of load rejection for a high-head Francis turbine based on structured overset mesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 658-671.
    3. Caralis, G. & Papantonis, D. & Zervos, A., 2012. "The role of pumped storage systems towards the large scale wind integration in the Greek power supply system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2558-2565.
    4. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    5. Sotoudeh, Nahale & Maddahian, Reza & Cervantes, Michel J., 2020. "Investigation of Rotating Vortex Rope formation during load variation in a Francis turbine draft tube," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 238-254.
    6. Goyal, Rahul & Gandhi, Bhupendra K., 2018. "Review of hydrodynamics instabilities in Francis turbine during off-design and transient operations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 697-709.
    7. Salehi, Saeed & Nilsson, Håkan & Lillberg, Eric & Edh, Nicolas, 2021. "An in-depth numerical analysis of transient flow field in a Francis turbine during shutdown," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2322-2347.
    8. Liu, ZhiYi & Wang, XiaoDong & Kang, Shun, 2014. "Stochastic performance evaluation of horizontal axis wind turbine blades using non-deterministic CFD simulations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 126-136.
    9. Choi, Hyen-Jun & Zullah, Mohammed Asid & Roh, Hyoung-Woon & Ha, Pil-Su & Oh, Sueg-Young & Lee, Young-Ho, 2013. "CFD validation of performance improvement of a 500 kW Francis turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 111-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salehi, Saeed & Nilsson, Håkan, 2022. "Flow-induced pulsations in Francis turbines during startup - A consequence of an intermittent energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1166-1183.
    2. Salehi, Saeed & Nilsson, Håkan & Lillberg, Eric & Edh, Nicolas, 2021. "An in-depth numerical analysis of transient flow field in a Francis turbine during shutdown," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2322-2347.
    3. Su, Wen-Tao & Binama, Maxime & Li, Yang & Zhao, Yue, 2020. "Study on the method of reducing the pressure fluctuation of hydraulic turbine by optimizing the draft tube pressure distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 550-560.
    4. Rocha, P. A. Costa & Rocha, H. H. Barbosa & Carneiro, F. O. Moura & da Silva, M. E. Vieira & de Andrade, C. Freitas, 2016. "A case study on the calibration of the k–ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model for small scale wind turbines designed with cambered and symmetrical airfoils," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 144-150.
    5. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    6. Borkowski, Dariusz & Węgiel, Michał & Ocłoń, Paweł & Węgiel, Tomasz, 2019. "CFD model and experimental verification of water turbine integrated with electrical generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 875-883.
    7. Wang, Zequn & Wang, Pingfeng, 2015. "A double-loop adaptive sampling approach for sensitivity-free dynamic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 346-356.
    8. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. He, Xianghui & Yang, Jiandong & Yang, Jiebin & Zhao, Zhigao & Hu, Jinhong & Peng, Tao, 2023. "Evolution mechanism of water column separation in pump turbine: Model experiment and occurrence criterion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    10. Ma, Tao & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin & Peng, Jinqing, 2014. "Technical feasibility study on a standalone hybrid solar-wind system with pumped hydro storage for a remote island in Hong Kong," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 7-15.
    11. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2018. "Sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on D-MORPH regression," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 17-30.
    12. Deyou, Li & Hongjie, Wang & Gaoming, Xiang & Ruzhi, Gong & Xianzhu, Wei & Zhansheng, Liu, 2015. "Unsteady simulation and analysis for hump characteristics of a pump turbine model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 32-42.
    13. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    14. Palar, Pramudita Satria & Zuhal, Lavi Rizki & Shimoyama, Koji, 2023. "Enhancing the explainability of regression-based polynomial chaos expansion by Shapley additive explanations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    15. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    16. Chongfei Sun & Zirong Luo & Jianzhong Shang & Zhongyue Lu & Yiming Zhu & Guoheng Wu, 2018. "Design and Numerical Analysis of a Novel Counter-Rotating Self-Adaptable Wave Energy Converter Based on CFD Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Solomon, A.A. & Kammen, Daniel M. & Callaway, D., 2016. "Investigating the impact of wind–solar complementarities on energy storage requirement and the corresponding supply reliability criteria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 130-145.
    18. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    19. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    20. Pronzato, Luc, 2019. "Sensitivity analysis via Karhunen–Loève expansion of a random field model: Estimation of Sobol’ indices and experimental design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 93-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:193:y:2022:i:c:p:57-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.