IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v123y2018icp52-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Degradation issues of PEM electrolysis MEAs

Author

Listed:
  • Siracusano, S.
  • Van Dijk, N.
  • Backhouse, R.
  • Merlo, L.
  • Baglio, V.
  • Aricò, A.S.

Abstract

One of main challenge of proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis is the achievement of a long-term durability exceeding 100 khours. Accordingly, degradation mechanisms of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) and stack components of PEM electrolysers deserve large attention. An important objective of the EU ELECTROHYPEM project was to develop components for PEM electrolysers with enhanced activity and stability in order to reduce stack and system costs and to improve efficiency, performance and durability. The focus of the project was concerning mainly with electrocatalysts and membranes development and validation of these materials in a PEM electrolyser. In this work, a first set of MEAs, used for 3500–5700 h in a PEM electrolyser, was investigated using electrochemical and physico-chemical techniques. The goal was to individuate key degradation issues and to provide a reliable estimation of the MEA endurance under real life operation. Specific approaches to mitigate the degradation mechanisms are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Siracusano, S. & Van Dijk, N. & Backhouse, R. & Merlo, L. & Baglio, V. & Aricò, A.S., 2018. "Degradation issues of PEM electrolysis MEAs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 52-57.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:123:y:2018:i:c:p:52-57
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118301678
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siracusano, Stefania & Baglio, Vincenzo & Van Dijk, Nicholas & Merlo, Luca & Aricò, Antonino Salvatore, 2017. "Enhanced performance and durability of low catalyst loading PEM water electrolyser based on a short-side chain perfluorosulfonic ionomer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 477-489.
    2. Mesfun, Sennai & Sanchez, Daniel L. & Leduc, Sylvain & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Lundgren, Joakim & Biberacher, Markus & Kraxner, Florian, 2017. "Power-to-gas and power-to-liquid for managing renewable electricity intermittency in the Alpine Region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 361-372.
    3. Götz, Manuel & Lefebvre, Jonathan & Mörs, Friedemann & McDaniel Koch, Amy & Graf, Frank & Bajohr, Siegfried & Reimert, Rainer & Kolb, Thomas, 2016. "Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1371-1390.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zhiming & Wang, Xueye & Chen, Zhichao & Liao, Zhirong & Xu, Chao & Du, Xiaoze, 2021. "Energy and exergy analysis of a proton exchange membrane water electrolysis system without additional internal cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1333-1343.
    2. Indro Biswas & Daniel G. Sánchez & Mathias Schulze & Jens Mitzel & Benjamin Kimmel & Aldo Saul Gago & Pawel Gazdzicki & K. Andreas Friedrich, 2020. "Advancement of Segmented Cell Technology in Low Temperature Hydrogen Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Pantò, Fabiola & Siracusano, Stefania & Briguglio, Nicola & Aricò, Antonino Salvatore, 2020. "Durability of a recombination catalyst-based membrane-electrode assembly for electrolysis operation at high current density," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Hughes, J.P. & Clipsham, J. & Chavushoglu, H. & Rowley-Neale, S.J. & Banks, C.E., 2021. "Polymer electrolyte electrolysis: A review of the activity and stability of non-precious metal hydrogen evolution reaction and oxygen evolution reaction catalysts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Toghyani, S. & Afshari, E. & Baniasadi, E. & Shadloo, M.S., 2019. "Energy and exergy analyses of a nanofluid based solar cooling and hydrogen production combined system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1013-1025.
    6. Zhang, Hong & Yuan, Tiejiang, 2022. "Optimization and economic evaluation of a PEM electrolysis system considering its degradation in variable-power operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    7. Liu, Hongdou & Yang, Hongquan & Qi, Ronghui, 2020. "A review of electrically driven dehumidification technology for air-conditioning systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    8. Papakonstantinou, Georgios & Algara-Siller, Gerardo & Teschner, Detre & Vidaković-Koch, Tanja & Schlögl, Robert & Sundmacher, Kai, 2020. "Degradation study of a proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer under dynamic operation conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    9. Biggins, Flora & Kataria, Mohit & Roberts, Diarmid & Brown, Dr Solomon, 2022. "Green hydrogen investments: Investigating the option to wait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Yilmaz, Hasan Ümitcan & Kimbrough, Steven O. & van Dinther, Clemens & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Power-to-gas: Decarbonization of the European electricity system with synthetic methane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    3. Zoltán Csedő & Máté Zavarkó & Balázs Vaszkun & Sára Koczkás, 2021. "Hydrogen Economy Development Opportunities by Inter-Organizational Digital Knowledge Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Valerie Eveloy & Tesfaldet Gebreegziabher, 2018. "A Review of Projected Power-to-Gas Deployment Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-52, July.
    5. Blanco, Herib & Nijs, Wouter & Ruf, Johannes & Faaij, André, 2018. "Potential of Power-to-Methane in the EU energy transition to a low carbon system using cost optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 323-340.
    6. Daraei, Mahsa & Campana, Pietro Elia & Thorin, Eva, 2020. "Power-to-hydrogen storage integrated with rooftop photovoltaic systems and combined heat and power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Ma, Jianli & Li, Qi & Kühn, Michael & Nakaten, Natalie, 2018. "Power-to-gas based subsurface energy storage: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 478-496.
    8. Eveloy, Valerie & Gebreegziabher, Tesfaldet, 2019. "Excess electricity and power-to-gas storage potential in the future renewable-based power generation sector in the United Arab Emirates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 426-450.
    9. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2018. "Power-to-gas for injection into the gas grid: What can we learn from real-life projects, economic assessments and systems modelling?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 302-316.
    10. Qi, Huiying & Zhang, Junfeng & Tu, Baofeng & Yin, Yanxia & Zhang, Tonghuan & Liu, Di & Zhang, Fujun & Su, Xin & Cui, Daan & Cheng, Mojie, 2022. "Extreme management strategy and thermodynamic analysis of high temperature H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis for energy conversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 229-241.
    11. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Andrea Barbaresi & Mirko Morini & Agostino Gambarotta, 2022. "Review on the Status of the Research on Power-to-Gas Experimental Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    13. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Frank, Jonas & Dettelbacher, Johannes & Ludwig, Ralf & Karl, Jürgen & Dillig, Marius, 2021. "Scenarios for the integration of renewable gases into the German natural gas market – A simulation-based optimisation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Zhang, Zhonglian & Yang, Xiaohui & Li, Moxuan & Deng, Fuwei & Xiao, Riying & Mei, Linghao & Hu, Zecheng, 2023. "Optimal configuration of improved dynamic carbon neutral energy systems based on hybrid energy storage and market incentives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    16. Katla, Daria & Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2020. "Evaluation of electricity generation subsystem of power-to-gas-to-power unit using gas expander and heat recovery steam generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    17. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    18. Andrade, Carlos & Selosse, Sandrine & Maïzi, Nadia, 2022. "The role of power-to-gas in the integration of variable renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    19. Ogden, Joan & Jaffe, Amy Myers & Scheitrum, Daniel & McDonald, Zane & Miller, Marshall, 2018. "Natural gas as a bridge to hydrogen transportation fuel: Insights from the literature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 317-329.
    20. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:123:y:2018:i:c:p:52-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.