IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v260y2025ics0951832025002005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating causal representations with domain adaptation for fault diagnosis

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Ming
  • Zhou, Kuang
  • Gao, Jiahui
  • Zhang, Fode

Abstract

In practical fault diagnosis, obtaining sufficient samples is often challenging. Transfer learning can help by using data from related domains, but significant distribution differences often exist due to different working conditions. To address this issue, cross-domain fault diagnosis (CDFD) has attracted increasing attention. However, most CDFD methods rely on statistical dependencies, which restricts their ability to uncover intrinsic mechanisms and affects both performance and reliability. In this paper, a Cross-domain Fault Diagnosis model based on Causal Representation learning (CFDCR) is proposed. This method employs causal representation learning with a graph autoencoder to learn invariant representations across domains, thereby improving the robustness of the prediction model. It further employs domain adversarial networks to align feature distributions, thus mitigating conditional distribution disparities between source domain data and target fault data, ultimately enhancing model performance. Experimental results on various bearing fault datasets demonstrate that the proposed cross-domain fault diagnosis model can effectively utilize related source domain data to guide fault classification tasks in the target domain and achieve more robust fault predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Ming & Zhou, Kuang & Gao, Jiahui & Zhang, Fode, 2025. "Integrating causal representations with domain adaptation for fault diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:260:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002005
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.110999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025002005
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.110999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:260:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.