IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v244y2024ics0951832024000231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capacity-based daily maintenance optimization of urban bus with multi-objective failure priority ranking

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Yu
  • Zheng, Ran

Abstract

There is a specific correlation between bus operational failures and work intensity. The hysteresis effect identified the correlation between the number of repairs and the bus capacity of urban bus fleets. Therefore, administrators can determine whether to perform maintenance on a specific bus based on the severity of detected potential failures. At this stage, administrators should make a maintenance decision after considering maintenance costs, operational losses, and bus capacity. As a result, we propose a model for optimizing maintenance decisions with multi-objective failure priority ranking in this article. We employ the TOPSIS to prioritize the maintenance of failed buses based on indicators such as transport capacity loss, downtime, and maintenance cost. Finally, the study verifies the model's validity by utilizing real data from urban bus operation and maintenance data in China. The outcomes of the case study indicate that implementing the model can reduce operating expenses by 18.8143% when considering a corrective maintenance cost of 300. The model adoption provides a significant reduction in operating costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Yu & Zheng, Ran, 2024. "Capacity-based daily maintenance optimization of urban bus with multi-objective failure priority ranking," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.109948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024000231
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.109948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024000231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.