IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v242y2024ics0951832023006579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of gamma usage processes on preventive maintenance policies under two-dimensional warranty

Author

Listed:
  • Peng, Shizhe
  • Jiang, Wei
  • Huang, Wenpo
  • Luo, Qinglin

Abstract

This study considers a manufacturer performing preventive maintenance (PM) on a product according to a one- or two-dimensional (2-D) policy. The one-dimensional PM policy is based on either time or usage, while in the two-dimensional case, PM is scheduled based on both scales. The product carries a 2-D warranty that offers protection for a certain amount of time and usage. Its cumulative usage is continuously monitored by the manufacturer and is assumed to follow a gamma process. In this context, we first propose a doubly stochastic Poisson process model for product failures where the stochastic intensity is influenced by the gamma usage process in an additive manner. We then explicitly derive the expected total costs of the two one-dimensional PM policies using the concepts of first hitting times and gamma bridges. For the 2-D PM policy, we express the associated cost in terms of the value function of a dynamic programming model. In the numerical experiments, we show how the variability of the usage process affects the costs of the three PM policies and find that the optimal 2-D policy degenerates into a one-dimensional policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng, Shizhe & Jiang, Wei & Huang, Wenpo & Luo, Qinglin, 2024. "The impact of gamma usage processes on preventive maintenance policies under two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006579
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023006579
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.