IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v237y2023ics0951832023002557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geometric deep learning for online prediction of cascading failures in power grids

Author

Listed:
  • Varbella, Anna
  • Gjorgiev, Blazhe
  • Sansavini, Giovanni

Abstract

Past events have revealed that widespread blackouts are mostly a result of cascading failures in the power grid. Understanding the underlining mechanisms of cascading failures can help in developing strategies to minimize the risk of such events. Moreover, a real-time detection of precursors to cascading failures will help operators take measures to prevent their propagation. Currently, the well-established probabilistic and physics-based models of cascading failures offer low computational efficiency, hindering them to be used only as offline tools. In this work, we develop a data-driven methodology for online estimation of the risk of cascading failures. We utilize a physics-based cascading failure model to generate a cascading failure dataset considering different operating conditions and failure scenarios, thus obtaining a sample space covering a large set of power grid states that are labeled as safe or unsafe. We use the synthetic data to train deep learning architectures, namely Feed-forward Neural Networks (FNN) and Graph Neural Networks (GNN). With the development of GNNs, improved performance is achieved with graph-structured data, and GNNs can generalize to graphs of diverse sizes. A comparison between FNN and GNN is made and the GNNs inductive capability is demonstrated via test grids. Furthermore, we apply transfer learning to improve the performance of a pre-trained GNN model on power grids not seen in the training process. The GNN model shows accuracy and balanced accuracy above 96% on selected test datasets not used in the training. Conversely, the FNN shows accuracy above 85% and balanced accuracy above 81% on test datasets unseen during training. Overall, the GNN model is successful in determining, if one or several simultaneous outages result in a critical grid state, under specific grid operating conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Varbella, Anna & Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2023. "Geometric deep learning for online prediction of cascading failures in power grids," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:237:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023002557
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023002557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arias Chao, Manuel & Kulkarni, Chetan & Goebel, Kai & Fink, Olga, 2022. "Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Hassan Haes Alhelou & Mohamad Esmail Hamedani-Golshan & Takawira Cuthbert Njenda & Pierluigi Siano, 2019. "A Survey on Power System Blackout and Cascading Events: Research Motivations and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Garrison, Jared B. & Han, Xuejiao & Landis, Florian & van Nieuwkoop, Renger & Raycheva, Elena & Schwarz, Marius & Yan, Xuqian & Demiray, Turhan & Hug, Gabriela & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2022. "Nexus-e: A platform of interfaced high-resolution models for energy-economic assessments of future electricity systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    5. Yang, Yang & Li, Suzhen & Zhang, Pengcheng, 2022. "Data-driven accident consequence assessment on urban gas pipeline network based on machine learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Xu, Sheng & Tu, Haicheng & Xia, Yongxiang, 2023. "Resilience enhancement of renewable cyber–physical power system against malware attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Li, Tianfu & Zhao, Zhibin & Sun, Chuang & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2021. "Hierarchical attention graph convolutional network to fuse multi-sensor signals for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2022. "Identifying and assessing power system vulnerabilities to transmission asset outages via cascading failure analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyu, Dongzhen & Niu, Guangxing & Liu, Enhui & Zhang, Bin & Chen, Gang & Yang, Tao & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Time space modelling for fault diagnosis and prognosis with uncertainty management: A general theoretical formulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Das, Laya & Merkel, Seline & Rohrer, Martina & Auger, Etienne & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2023. "Simulation-driven deep learning for locating faulty insulators in a power line," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. He, Yuxuan & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Peng, Shiliang & Fan, Lin & Yang, Zhaoming & Yang, Zhe & Zhang, Jinjun, 2023. "A systematic method of remaining useful life estimation based on physics-informed graph neural networks with multisensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Lewis, Austin D. & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "Metrics for evaluating the performance of complex engineering system health monitoring models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Xiong, Jiawei & Zhou, Jian & Ma, Yizhong & Zhang, Fengxia & Lin, Chenglong, 2023. "Adaptive deep learning-based remaining useful life prediction framework for systems with multiple failure patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Huang, Zhifu & Yang, Yang & Hu, Yawei & Ding, Xiang & Li, Xuanlin & Liu, Yongbin, 2023. "Attention-augmented recalibrated and compensatory network for machine remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Miri, Mohammad & Saffari, Mohammadali & Arjmand, Reza & McPherson, Madeleine, 2022. "Integrated models in action: Analyzing flexibility in the Canadian power system toward a zero-emission future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    8. Aizpurua, J.I. & Stewart, B.G. & McArthur, S.D.J. & Penalba, M. & Barrenetxea, M. & Muxika, E. & Ringwood, J.V., 2022. "Probabilistic forecasting informed failure prognostics framework for improved RUL prediction under uncertainty: A transformer case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Zhu, Rong & Chen, Yuan & Peng, Weiwen & Ye, Zhi-Sheng, 2022. "Bayesian deep-learning for RUL prediction: An active learning perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Xia, Liqiao & Liang, Yongshi & Leng, Jiewu & Zheng, Pai, 2023. "Maintenance planning recommendation of complex industrial equipment based on knowledge graph and graph neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    11. Kong, Ziqian & Jin, Xiaohang & Xu, Zhengguo & Chen, Zian, 2023. "A contrastive learning framework enhanced by unlabeled samples for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. Wang, Yilin & Li, Yuanxiang & Zhang, Yuxuan & Lei, Jia & Yu, Yifei & Zhang, Tongtong & Yang, Yongshen & Zhao, Honghua, 2024. "Incorporating prior knowledge into self-supervised representation learning for long PHM signal," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    13. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Joel Seppälä & Pertti Järventausta, 2024. "Analyzing Supply Reliability Incentive in Pricing Regulation of Electricity Distribution Operators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Tang, Daogui & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Vulnerability analysis of demand-response with renewable energy integration in smart grids to cyber attacks and online detection methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Abubakar Ahmad Musa & Adamu Hussaini & Weixian Liao & Fan Liang & Wei Yu, 2023. "Deep Neural Networks for Spatial-Temporal Cyber-Physical Systems: A Survey," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Mingfei Li & Jiajian Wu & Zhengpeng Chen & Jiangbo Dong & Zhiping Peng & Kai Xiong & Mumin Rao & Chuangting Chen & Xi Li, 2022. "Data-Driven Voltage Prognostic for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Based on Deep Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Aníbal Antonio Prada Hurtado & Eduardo Martinez Carrasco & Maria Teresa Villén Martínez & Jose Saldana, 2022. "Application of IIA Method and Virtual Bus Theory for Backup Protection of a Zone Using PMU Data in a WAMPAC System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, May.
    20. Hughes, William & Zhang, Wei & Cerrai, Diego & Bagtzoglou, Amvrossios & Wanik, David & Anagnostou, Emmanouil, 2022. "A Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Model for Power Distribution System Infrastructure Hardening and Outage Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:237:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023002557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.