IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v213y2021ics0951832021002143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of three preventive maintenance warranty policies for products deteriorating with age and a time-varying covariate

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Rui
  • Zhou, Yifan

Abstract

The development of condition monitoring technology initiates a new tendency towards incorporating condition-based maintenance (CBM) into warranty policies to reduce the manufacturer's expense over the warranty period. However, CBM is not always more cost-effective than time-based maintenance (TBM), or vice versa. This paper investigates three preventive maintenance (PM) policies for a product sold with a free repair warranty and examines under which situation each policy is optimal. The product deteriorates with both age and a time-varying covariate and its failure rate is described by Cox's proportional hazards model. The covariate can only be revealed by condition monitoring. In policy 1, no inspection is performed and PM actions are carried out periodically. Continuous inspection is performed in policy 2 where a PM action is recommended once continuing operation is not cost-effective. Policy 3 applies periodic inspection to select appropriate maintenance action at each inspection epoch. The warranty servicing costs are analyzed in the Markov decision process framework based on a discretization method. The policy structures of the CBM policies are proved to be of control-limit forms. A practical numerical example is provided to illustrate the proposed approach. The results can help the manufacturer design effective warranty policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Rui & Zhou, Yifan, 2021. "Comparison of three preventive maintenance warranty policies for products deteriorating with age and a time-varying covariate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:213:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021002143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021002143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackson, Canek & Pascual, Rodrigo, 2008. "Optimal maintenance service contract negotiation with aging equipment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 387-398, September.
    2. Su, Chun & Wang, Xiaolin, 2016. "A two-stage preventive maintenance optimization model incorporating two-dimensional extended warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 169-178.
    3. Hu, Jiawen & Chen, Piao, 2020. "Predictive maintenance of systems subject to hard failure based on proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Wang, Xiaolin & Li, Lishuai & Xie, Min, 2020. "An unpunctual preventive maintenance policy under two-dimensional warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 304-318.
    5. Zhang, Chen & Gao, Wei & Yang, Tao & Guo, Sheng, 2019. "Opportunistic maintenance strategy for wind turbines considering weather conditions and spare parts inventory management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 703-711.
    6. Zheng, Rui & Chen, Bingkun & Gu, Liudong, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance with dynamic thresholds for a system using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. Sayyideh Mehri Mousavi & Hesam Shams & Shahrzad Ahmadi, 2017. "Simultaneous optimization of repair and control-limit policy in condition-based maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 245-254, January.
    8. Lijun Shang & Shubin Si & Shudong Sun & Tongdan Jin, 2018. "Optimal warranty design and post-warranty maintenance for products subject to stochastic degradation," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(10), pages 913-927, October.
    9. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 463-471.
    10. Murthy, D. N. P. & Djamaludin, I., 2002. "New product warranty: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 231-260, October.
    11. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    12. Wang, Yukun & Liu, Yiliu & Liu, Zixian & Li, Xiaopeng, 2017. "On reliability improvement program for second-hand products sold with a two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 452-463.
    13. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    14. Xiang Wu & Sarah Ryan, 2010. "Value of condition monitoring for optimal replacement in the proportional hazards model with continuous degradation," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 553-563.
    15. Liu, Bin & Liang, Zhenglin & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "Condition-based maintenance for systems with aging and cumulative damage based on proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 200-209.
    16. Wang, Jingjing & Zhao, Xian & Guo, Xiaoxin, 2019. "Optimizing wind turbine's maintenance policies under performance-based contract," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 626-634.
    17. Yeh, Ruey Huei & Lo, Hui-Chiung, 2001. "Optimal preventive-maintenance warranty policy for repairable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 59-69, October.
    18. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    19. Makis, Viliam & Wu, Jianmou & Gao, Yan, 2006. "An application of DPCA to oil data for CBM modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 112-123, October.
    20. Giri, B.C. & Dohi, T., 2007. "Inspection scheduling for imperfect production processes under free repair warranty contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 238-252, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Rui & Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zhang, Yingzhi, 2022. "A recursive method for the health assessment of systems using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Zhu, Ying & Xia, Tangbin & Chen, Zhen & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2022. "Optimal maintenance service strategy for OEM entering competitive MRO market under opposite patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Xu, Gaowei & Azhari, Fae, 2022. "Data-driven optimization of repair schemes and inspection intervals for highway bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Liu, Peng & Wang, Guanjun, 2022. "Minimal repair models with non-negligible repair time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Liu, Peng & Wang, Guanjun, 2023. "Generalized non-renewing replacement warranty policy and an age-based post-warranty maintenance strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 567-580.
    6. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Fang, Chih-Chiang & Lu, Chang-Ming & (Bill) Tseng, Tzu-Liang, 2022. "Optimal Warranty Policy for Consumer Electronics with Dependent Competing Failure Processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Li, Ting & He, Shuguang & Zhao, Xiujie, 2022. "Optimal warranty policy design for deteriorating products with random failure threshold," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    8. Ram Niwas & M. S. Kadyan, 2022. "A bi-objective inspection policy for a repairable engineering system with failure free warranty," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 881-891, April.
    9. Chen, Liwei & Gao, Yansan & Dui, Hongyan & Xing, Liudong, 2021. "Importance measure-based maintenance optimization strategy for pod slewing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Li, Ting & He, Shuguang & Zhao, Xiujie & Liu, Bin, 2023. "Warranty service contracts design for deteriorating products with maintenance duration commitments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Rui & Wang, Jingjing & Zhang, Yingzhi, 2023. "A hybrid repair-replacement policy in the proportional hazards model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1011-1021.
    2. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Zheng, Rui & Chen, Bingkun & Gu, Liudong, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance with dynamic thresholds for a system using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Liu, Xingheng & Vatn, Jørn, 2023. "Maintenance optimization of a system subject to two-stage degradation, hard failure, and imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    6. Xu, Gaowei & Azhari, Fae, 2022. "Data-driven optimization of repair schemes and inspection intervals for highway bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Safaei, Fatemeh & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2022. "Optimal preventive maintenance for repairable products with three types of failures sold under a renewable hybrid FRW/PRW policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. Zhao, Xiujie & Liu, Bin & Xu, Jianyu & Wang, Xiao-Lin, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance policies for warranted products under stochastic performance degradation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 150-165.
    9. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    10. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Yukun Wang & Yiliu Liu & Aibo Zhang, 2019. "Preventive maintenance optimization for repairable products considering two-dimensional warranty and customer satisfaction," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 553-566, August.
    12. Hu, Jiawen & Shen, Jingyuan & Shen, Lijuan, 2020. "Opportunistic maintenance for two-component series systems subject to dependent degradation and shock," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Lijun Shang & Guojun Shang & Qingan Qiu, 2022. "A Bivariate Post-Warranty Maintenance Model for the Product under a 2D Warranty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Wang, Xiaolin & Li, Lishuai & Xie, Min, 2020. "An unpunctual preventive maintenance policy under two-dimensional warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 304-318.
    15. Zheng, Rui & Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zhang, Yingzhi, 2022. "A recursive method for the health assessment of systems using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    16. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Jiao, Can & Yuan, Tao, 2019. "Optimal decisions on product reliability, sales and promotion under nonrenewable warranties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Zhang, Nan & Deng, Yingjun & Liu, Bin & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "Condition-based maintenance for a multi-component system in a dynamic operating environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    18. Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zheng, Rui & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2021. "An optimal opportunistic maintenance policy for a two-unit series system with general repair using proportional hazards models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    19. Wang, Dongfan & He, Zhen & He, Shuguang & Zhang, Zhaomin & Zhang, Yiwen, 2021. "Dynamic pricing of two-dimensional extended warranty considering the impacts of product price fluctuations and repair learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Zhu, Ying & Xia, Tangbin & Chen, Zhen & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2022. "Optimal maintenance service strategy for OEM entering competitive MRO market under opposite patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:213:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021002143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.