IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v209y2021ics0951832021000065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deriving a representative variant for the functional safety development according to ISO 26262

Author

Listed:
  • Schranner, Felix S.
  • Misheni, Alireza Abassi
  • Warnecke, Jork

Abstract

The emerging mass individualization (Koren et al., 2015) in series produced road vehicles, superseding mass customization, entails an increase in variants and complexity. The question “How may the functional safety development effort, corresponding to the variant numbers and complexity be tackled while complying to the standard ISO 26262:2018? (ISO, 2018)†motivates this work.

Suggested Citation

  • Schranner, Felix S. & Misheni, Alireza Abassi & Warnecke, Jork, 2021. "Deriving a representative variant for the functional safety development according to ISO 26262," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:209:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021000065
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021000065
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107436?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bas, Esra, 2011. "An investment plan for preventing child injuries using risk priority number of failure mode and effects analysis methodology and a multi-objective, multi-dimensional mixed 0-1 knapsack model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 748-756.
    2. Sinha, Purnendu, 2011. "Architectural design and reliability analysis of a fail-operational brake-by-wire system from ISO 26262 perspectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1349-1359.
    3. Cuer, Romain & Piétrac, Laurent & Niel, Eric & Diallo, Saidou & Minoiu-Enache, Nicoleta & Dang-Van-Nhan, Christophe, 2018. "A formal framework for the safe design of the Autonomous Driving supervision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 29-40.
    4. Thieme, Christoph A. & Mosleh, Ali & Utne, Ingrid B. & Hegde, Jeevith, 2020. "Incorporating software failure in risk analysis––Part 2: Risk modeling process and case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Huang, Chao & Li, Liang, 2020. "Architectural design and analysis of a steer-by-wire system in view of functional safety concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Aven, Terje & Ylönen, Marja, 2018. "A risk interpretation of sociotechnical safety perspectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 13-18.
    7. Beckers, Kristian & Holling, Dominik & Côté, Isabelle & Hatebur, Denis, 2017. "A structured hazard analysis and risk assessment method for automotive systems—A descriptive study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 185-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pauer, Gábor & Török, à rpád, 2022. "Introducing a novel safety assessment method through the example of a reduced complexity binary integer autonomous transport model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Huang, Chao & Li, Liang, 2020. "Architectural design and analysis of a steer-by-wire system in view of functional safety concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Khastgir, Siddartha & Brewerton, Simon & Thomas, John & Jennings, Paul, 2021. "Systems Approach to Creating Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Zhang, Yan & Wang, Yu-Hao & Zhao, Xu & Tong, Rui-Peng, 2023. "Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of emergency response for intelligent coal mining face system, case study: Gas overrun scenario," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    5. Liu, Peng & Zhang, Yawen & He, Zhen, 2019. "The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 341-347.
    6. Cheng, Ruijun & Cheng, Yu & Chen, Dewang & Song, Haifeng, 2021. "Online quantitative safety monitoring approach for unattended train operation system considering stochastic factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Shuai Lin & Limin Jia & Hengrun Zhang & Yanhui Wang, 2021. "A method for assessing resilience of high-speed EMUs considering a network-based system topology and performance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 877-895, October.
    8. Granig, Wolfgang & Faller, Lisa-Marie & Hammerschmidt, Dirk & Zangl, Hubert, 2019. "Dependability considerations of redundant sensor systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Thieme, Christoph A. & Mosleh, Ali & Utne, Ingrid B. & Hegde, Jeevith, 2020. "Incorporating software failure in risk analysis – Part 1: Software functional failure mode classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Huang, Shuang & Zhou, Chunjie & Yang, Lili & Qin, Yuanqing & Huang, Xiongfeng & Hu, Bowen, 2016. "Transient fault tolerant control for vehicle brake-by-wire systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 148-163.
    11. Hassan Mohammadi Pirouz & Amin Hajizadeh, 2020. "A Highly Reliable Propulsion System with Onboard Uninterruptible Power Supply for Train Application: Topology and Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-30, May.
    12. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2013. "A reduction dynamic programming algorithm for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 299-313.
    13. Langdalen, Henrik & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås, 2020. "On the importance of systems thinking when using the ALARP principle for risk management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Aven, Terje & Zio, Enrico, 2021. "Globalization and global risk: How risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Aven, Terje, 2019. "The cautionary principle in risk management: Foundation and practical use," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Congcong Li & Guirong Zhuo & Chen Tang & Lu Xiong & Wei Tian & Le Qiao & Yulin Cheng & Yanlong Duan, 2023. "A Review of Electro-Mechanical Brake (EMB) System: Structure, Control and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-38, March.
    17. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2014. "Dynamic programming algorithms for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 85-99.
    18. Beckers, Kristian & Côté, Isabelle & Frese, Thomas & Hatebur, Denis & Heisel, Maritta, 2017. "A structured and systematic model-based development method for automotive systems, considering the OEM/supplier interface," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 172-184.
    19. Chai, Ming & Zhang, Xinyi & Schlingloff, Bernd-Holger & Tang, Tao & Liu, Hongjie, 2024. "Online hazard prediction of train operations with parametric hybrid automata based runtime verification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    20. Langdalen, Henrik & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Abrahamsen, HÃ¥kon Bjorheim, 2020. "A New Framework To Idenitfy And Assess Hidden Assumptions In The Background Knowledge Of A Risk Assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:209:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021000065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.