IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v165y2017icp368-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disaster factor screening using SoS conceptual modeling and an LVC simulation framework

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Matthew T.
  • Proctor, Michael D.
  • Shageer, Buder

Abstract

Reliability and safety of engineered systems often extends to a system composed of autonomous and heterogeneous systems. Systems integration enables formation of larger system of systems with greater, encompassing scope and goals. Nuclear power station reliability and safety involves an extensive system of systems. Failures at Chernobyl and Fukushima underscore the rare but catastrophic ripple-effect of a failed system within a system of systems conceptual model. Modeling and simulation of systems with various scenarios increases confidence in conceptual models, particularly scenarios that are too costly or risky to assess by other means. This research implements a system of systems conceptual model of a notional Fukishima-like disaster using a Live-Virtual-Constructive simulation framework. Focusing on a conceptual model involving an unmanned aerial system intervention, the research illustrates the framework's utility and effectiveness for assessing system reliability and safety within the conceptual model. Novel use of a screening experiment demonstrates the framework's capability to rapidly identify critical factors and their significance. A framework encompassing live, virtual, and constructive simulations provides a generalized capability to compose, simulate, and evaluate from multiple perspectives the suitability of various systems and conceptual models to accomplish a broad range of emergency response missions including the one investigated here.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Matthew T. & Proctor, Michael D. & Shageer, Buder, 2017. "Disaster factor screening using SoS conceptual modeling and an LVC simulation framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 368-375.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:368-375
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016307657
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salman, Abdullahi M. & Li, Yue & Stewart, Mark G., 2015. "Evaluating system reliability and targeted hardening strategies of power distribution systems subjected to hurricanes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 319-333.
    2. Edward Ianovsky & Joseph Kreimer, 2011. "An optimal routing policy for unmanned aerial vehicles (analytical and cross-entropy simulation approach)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 215-253, September.
    3. Ferrario, E. & Zio, E., 2014. "Assessing nuclear power plant safety and recovery from earthquakes using a system-of-systems approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 103-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhai, Chengwei & Chen, Thomas Ying-jeh & White, Anna Grace & Guikema, Seth David, 2021. "Power outage prediction for natural hazards using synthetic power distribution systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Popović, Željko N. & KovaÄ ki, Neven V. & Popović, Dragan S., 2020. "Resilient distribution network planning under the severe windstorms using a risk-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Hughes, William & Zhang, Wei & Cerrai, Diego & Bagtzoglou, Amvrossios & Wanik, David & Anagnostou, Emmanouil, 2022. "A Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Model for Power Distribution System Infrastructure Hardening and Outage Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Xiaoge Zhang & Sankaran Mahadevan & Kai Goebel, 2019. "Network Reconfiguration for Increasing Transportation System Resilience Under Extreme Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 2054-2075, September.
    6. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    7. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    8. Hossain, Eklas & Roy, Shidhartho & Mohammad, Naeem & Nawar, Nafiu & Dipta, Debopriya Roy, 2021. "Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    9. Dikshit, Saransh & Alipour, Alice, 2023. "A moment-matching method for fragility analysis of transmission towers under straight line winds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    10. Marvin L. King & David R. Galbreath & Alexandra M. Newman & Amanda S. Hering, 2020. "Combining regression and mixed-integer programming to model counterinsurgency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 287-320, September.
    11. Omer Ozkan & Sezgin Kilic, 2023. "UAV routing by simulation-based optimization approaches for forest fire risk mitigation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 937-973, January.
    12. Zhang, Jintao & Bagtzoglou, Yiannis & Zhu, Jin & Li, Baikun & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "Fragility-based system performance assessment of critical power infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Bi, Wenzhe & Tian, Li & Li, Chao & Ma, Zhen & Pan, Haiyang, 2023. "Wind-induced failure analysis of a transmission tower-line system with long-term measured data and orientation effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Lin, Yanling & Bie, Zhaohong, 2018. "Tri-level optimal hardening plan for a resilient distribution system considering reconfiguration and DG islanding," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1266-1279.
    15. Shen, Zhonghui & Wei, Kai, 2021. "Stochastic model of tropical cyclones along China coast including the effects of spatial heterogeneity and ocean feedback," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Rychlik, Tomasz, 2017. "Evaluations of quantiles of system lifetime distributions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 935-944.
    17. Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
    18. Jasiūnas, Justinas & Lund, Peter D. & Mikkola, Jani, 2021. "Energy system resilience – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. Hou, Guangyang & Muraleetharan, Kanthasamy K. & Panchalogaranjan, Vinushika & Moses, Paul & Javid, Amir & Al-Dakheeli, Hussein & Bulut, Rifat & Campos, Richard & Harvey, P. Scott & Miller, Gerald & Bo, 2023. "Resilience assessment and enhancement evaluation of power distribution systems subjected to ice storms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Caputo, Antonio C. & Kalemi, Bledar & Paolacci, Fabrizio & Corritore, Daniele, 2020. "Computing resilience of process plants under Na-Tech events: Methodology and application to sesmic loading scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:368-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.