IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v85y2014icp54-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A waste management planning based on substance flow analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Arena, Umberto
  • Di Gregorio, Fabrizio

Abstract

The paper describes the results of a municipal solid waste management planning based on an extensive utilization of material and substance flow analysis, combined with the results of specific life cycle assessment studies. The mass flow rates of wastes and their main chemical elements were quantified with a view to providing scientific support to the decision-making process and to ensure that the technical inputs to this process are transparent and rigorous. The role of each waste management option (recycling chains, biological and thermal treatments), as well as that of different levels of household source separation and collection (SSC), was quantitatively determined. The plant requirements were consequently evaluated, by assessing the benefits afforded by the application of high quality SSC, biological treatment of the wet organic fraction, and thermal treatment of unsorted residual waste. Landfill volumes and greenhouse gas emissions are minimized, toxic organic materials are mineralized, heavy metals are concentrated in a small fraction of the total former solid waste volume, and the accumulation of atmophilic metals in the air pollution control residues allows new recycling schemes to be designed for metals. The results also highlight that the sustainability of very high levels of SSC is reduced by the large quantities of sorting and recycling residues, amounts of toxic substances in the recycled products, as well as logistic and economic difficulties of obtaining very high interception levels. The combination of material and substance flow analysis with an environmental assessment method such as life cycle assessment appears an attractive tool-box for comparing alternative waste management technologies and scenarios, and then to support waste management decisions on both strategic and operating levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Arena, Umberto & Di Gregorio, Fabrizio, 2014. "A waste management planning based on substance flow analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 54-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:85:y:2014:i:c:p:54-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344913001274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Björklund, Anna & Finnveden, Göran, 2005. "Recycling revisited—life cycle comparisons of global warming impact and total energy use of waste management strategies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 309-317.
    2. Maria Laura Mastellone & Paul H. Brunner & Umberto Arena, 2009. "Scenarios of Waste Management for a Waste Emergency Area," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(5), pages 735-757, October.
    3. Paul H. Brunner, 2004. "Materials Flow Analysis and the Ultimate Sink," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(3), pages 4-7, July.
    4. Yoshida, Hiroko & Gable, Joshua J. & Park, Jae K., 2012. "Evaluation of organic waste diversion alternatives for greenhouse gas reduction," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ueberschaar, Maximilian & Geiping, Julia & Zamzow, Malte & Flamme, Sabine & Rotter, Vera Susanne, 2017. "Assessment of element-specific recycling efficiency in WEEE pre-processing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 25-41.
    2. Ajay Singh, 2022. "Sustainable Waste Management Through Systems Engineering Models and Remote Sensing Approaches," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    3. Margallo, M. & Dominguez-Ramos, A. & Aldaco, R. & Bala, A. & Fullana, P. & Irabien, A., 2014. "Environmental sustainability assessment in the process industry: A case study of waste-to-energy plants in Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 144-155.
    4. Cai, Yanpeng & Yue, Wencong & Xu, Linyu & Yang, Zhifeng & Rong, Qiangqiang, 2016. "Sustainable urban water resources management considering life-cycle environmental impacts of water utilization under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 21-40.
    5. Jain, K.P. & Pruyn, J.F.J. & Hopman, J.J., 2016. "Quantitative assessment of material composition of end-of-life ships using onboard documentation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-9.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arena, Umberto & Di Gregorio, Fabrizio, 2014. "Energy generation by air gasification of two industrial plastic wastes in a pilot scale fluidized bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 735-743.
    2. Lazarevic, David & Aoustin, Emmanuelle & Buclet, Nicolas & Brandt, Nils, 2010. "Plastic waste management in the context of a European recycling society: Comparing results and uncertainties in a life cycle perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 246-259.
    3. Krausmann, Fridolin & Gingrich, Simone & Eisenmenger, Nina & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Haberl, Helmut & Fischer-Kowalski, Marina, 2009. "Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2696-2705, August.
    4. Sahlin, Jenny & Ekvall, Tomas & Bisaillon, Mattias & Sundberg, Johan, 2007. "Introduction of a waste incineration tax: Effects on the Swedish waste flows," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 827-846.
    5. Heba Allah Essam E. Khalil & Ahmad Al‐Ahwal, 2021. "Reunderstanding Cairo through urban metabolism: Formal versus informal districts resource flow performance in fast urbanizing cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 176-192, February.
    6. Zhao, Yan & Deng, Wenjing, 2014. "Environmental impacts of different food waste resource technologies and the effects of energy mix," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 214-221.
    7. Turner, David A. & Williams, Ian D. & Kemp, Simon, 2015. "Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 186-197.
    8. Hunt, Emily J. & Zhang, Chenlong & Anzalone, Nick & Pearce, Joshua M., 2015. "Polymer recycling codes for distributed manufacturing with 3-D printers," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 24-30.
    9. Hottle, Troy A. & Bilec, Melissa M. & Landis, Amy E., 2017. "Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 295-306.
    10. Vossberg, Cherilyn & Mason-Jones, Kyle & Cohen, Brett, 2014. "An energetic life cycle assessment of C&D waste and container glass recycling in Cape Town, South Africa," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 39-49.
    11. Brattebø, Helge & Reenaas, Marte, 2012. "Comparing CO2 and NOX emissions from a district heating system with mass-burn waste incineration versus likely alternative solutions – City of Trondheim, 1986–2009," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.
    12. Meylan, Grégoire & Ami, Helen & Spoerri, Andy, 2014. "Transitions of municipal solid waste management. Part II: Hybrid life cycle assessment of Swiss glass-packaging disposal," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 16-27.
    13. Williams, Thomas G.J.L. & Heidrich, Oliver & Sallis, Paul J., 2010. "A case study of the open-loop recycling of mixed plastic waste for use in a sports-field drainage system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 118-128.
    14. Sathre, Roger & Gustavsson, Leif, 2006. "Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 332-355.
    15. Di Gregorio, F. & Zaccariello, Lucio, 2012. "Fluidized bed gasification of a packaging derived fuel: energetic, environmental and economic performances comparison for waste-to-energy plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 331-341.
    16. van Sluisveld, Mariësse A.E. & Worrell, Ernst, 2013. "The paradox of packaging optimization – a characterization of packaging source reduction in the Netherlands," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 133-142.
    17. Tonini, Davide & Dorini, Gianluca & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard, 2014. "Bioenergy, material, and nutrients recovery from household waste: Advanced material, substance, energy, and cost flow analysis of a waste refinery process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 64-78.
    18. Alessio Miatto & Claudia Sartori & Martina Bianchi & Paolo Borin & Andrea Giordano & Shoshanna Saxe & T.E. Graedel, 2022. "Tracking the material cycle of Italian bricks with the aid of building information modeling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 609-626, April.
    19. Merrild, Hanna & Damgaard, Anders & Christensen, Thomas H., 2008. "Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 1391-1398.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:85:y:2014:i:c:p:54-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.