IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v92y2014icp214-221.html

Environmental impacts of different food waste resource technologies and the effects of energy mix

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yan
  • Deng, Wenjing

Abstract

The environmental impacts of food waste management strategies and the effects of energy mix were evaluated using a life cycle assessment model, EASEWASTE. Three different strategies involving landfill, composting and combined digestion and composting as core technologies were investigated. The results indicate that the landfilling of food waste has an obvious impact on global warming, although the power recovery from landfill gas counteracts some of this. Food waste composting causes serious acidification (68.0PE) and nutrient enrichment (76.9PE) because of NH3 and SO2 emissions during decomposition. Using compost on farmland, which can marginally reduce global warming (−1.7PE), acidification (−0.8PE), and ecotoxicity and human toxicity through fertilizer substitution, also leads to nutrient enrichment as neutralization of emissions from N loss (27.6PE) and substitution (−12.8PE). A combined digestion and composting technology lessens the effects of acidification (−12.2PE), nutrient enrichment (−5.7PE), and global warming (−7.9PE) mainly because energy is recovered efficiently, which decreases emissions including SO2, Hg, NOx, and fossil CO2 during normal energy production. The change of energy mix by introducing more clean energy, which has marginal effects on the performance of composting strategy, results in apparently more loading to acidification and nutrient enrichment in the other two strategies. These are mainly because the recovered energy can avoid fewer emissions than before due to the lower background values in power generation. These results provide quantitative evidence for technical selection and pollution control in food waste management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yan & Deng, Wenjing, 2014. "Environmental impacts of different food waste resource technologies and the effects of energy mix," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 214-221.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:92:y:2014:i:c:p:214-221
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344914001487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothy Blair & Jeffery Sobal, 2006. "Luxus Consumption: Wasting Food Resources Through Overeating," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 23(1), pages 63-74, March.
    2. Boldrin, Alessio & Hartling, Karin R. & Laugen, Maria & Christensen, Thomas H., 2010. "Environmental inventory modelling of the use of compost and peat in growth media preparation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1250-1260.
    3. Björklund, Anna & Finnveden, Göran, 2005. "Recycling revisited—life cycle comparisons of global warming impact and total energy use of waste management strategies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 309-317.
    4. Rehl, T. & Müller, J., 2011. "Life cycle assessment of biogas digestate processing technologies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 92-104.
    5. Emery, Andrew & Davies, Anthony & Griffiths, Anthony & Williams, Keith, 2007. "Environmental and economic modelling: A case study of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Wales," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 244-263.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Campoy-Muñoz, P. & Cardenete, M.A. & Delgado, M.C., 2017. "Economic impact assessment of food waste reduction on European countries through social accounting matrices," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 202-209.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lazarevic, David & Aoustin, Emmanuelle & Buclet, Nicolas & Brandt, Nils, 2010. "Plastic waste management in the context of a European recycling society: Comparing results and uncertainties in a life cycle perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 246-259.
    2. Francesco La Barbera & Mario Amato & Roberta Riverso & Fabio Verneau, 2022. "Social Emotions and Good Provider Norms in Tackling Household Food Waste: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Woon, Kok Sin & Lo, Irene M.C., 2016. "An integrated life cycle costing and human health impact analysis of municipal solid waste management options in Hong Kong using modified eco-efficiency indicator," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 104-114.
    4. Thyberg, Krista L. & Tonjes, David J., 2016. "Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 110-123.
    5. Silvio Franco & Clara Cicatiello, 2018. "Food waste due to over-nutrition in the Italians? dietary habits," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 159-180.
    6. Gyula Kasza & Annamária Dorkó & Atilla Kunszabó & Dávid Szakos, 2020. "Quantification of Household Food Waste in Hungary: A Replication Study Using the FUSIONS Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Turner, David A. & Williams, Ian D. & Kemp, Simon, 2015. "Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 186-197.
    8. Hunt, Emily J. & Zhang, Chenlong & Anzalone, Nick & Pearce, Joshua M., 2015. "Polymer recycling codes for distributed manufacturing with 3-D printers," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 24-30.
    9. Hottle, Troy A. & Bilec, Melissa M. & Landis, Amy E., 2017. "Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 295-306.
    10. Brattebø, Helge & Reenaas, Marte, 2012. "Comparing CO2 and NOX emissions from a district heating system with mass-burn waste incineration versus likely alternative solutions – City of Trondheim, 1986–2009," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 147-158.
    11. Yiyao Ni & Zhen Zhang, 2024. "Comparison and Selection of Wet Waste Disposal Modes for Villages in Agriculture-Related Towns Taking Shanghai, China, as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Cangxiang Wen & Zheqin Dai & Fangkui Cheng & Helai Cheng & Zixuan Yang & Qingxiu Cai & Xiao Zha & Xiwu Lu, 2024. "Review on research achievements of blackwater anaerobic digestion for enhanced resource recovery," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-31, January.
    13. Hadjikakou, Michalis, 2017. "Trimming the excess: environmental impacts of discretionary food consumption in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 119-128.
    14. Michela Langone & Daniele Basso, 2020. "Process Waters from Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sludge: Characteristics and Possible Valorization Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-33, September.
    15. Williams, Thomas G.J.L. & Heidrich, Oliver & Sallis, Paul J., 2010. "A case study of the open-loop recycling of mixed plastic waste for use in a sports-field drainage system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 118-128.
    16. Sabrina Arcuri, 2019. "Food poverty, food waste and the consensus frame on charitable food redistribution in Italy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 263-275, June.
    17. Alexandra Horobet & Lucian Belascu & Magdalena Radulescu & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Cosmin-Alin Botoroga & Cristina-Carmencita Negreanu, 2024. "Exploring the Nexus between Greenhouse Emissions, Environmental Degradation and Green Energy in Europe: A Critique of the Environmental Kuznets Curve," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-29, October.
    18. Recchia, Lucia & Sarri, Daniele & Rimediotti, Marco & Boncinelli, Paolo & Vieri, Marco & Cini, Enrico, 2013. "Environmental benefits from the use of the residual biomass in nurseries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 31-39.
    19. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang, 2019. "Analyzing Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Scenarios in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities in Developing Countries: The Case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Ortner, Maria E. & Müller, Wolfgang & Schneider, Irene & Bockreis, Anke, 2016. "Environmental assessment of three different utilization paths of waste cooking oil from households," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 59-67.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:92:y:2014:i:c:p:214-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.