IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v113y2016icp88-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multilevel sustainability analysis of zinc recovery from wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Ng, Kok Siew
  • Head, Ian
  • Premier, Giuliano C.
  • Scott, Keith
  • Yu, Eileen
  • Lloyd, Jon
  • Sadhukhan, Jhuma

Abstract

As waste generation increases with increasing population, regulations become stricter to control and mitigate environmental emissions of substances, e.g. heavy metals such as zinc and copper. Recovering these resources from wastes is the key interest of industries. The objective of this paper is the sustainability and feasibility evaluations of zinc recovery from waste streams. Sustainability and feasibility of a resource recovery strategy from wastes in a circular economy are governed by avoided environmental impacts and cost-effective transformation of an environmental contaminant into a valuable resource, e.g. as a coproduct by making use of an existing infrastructure as much as possible. This study, for the first time, gives a comprehensive overview of secondary sources and processes of recovering zinc, its stock analysis by country, regional and global divisions by a Sankey diagram, policies to regulate zinc emissions and avoided environmental impacts by zinc recovery. Two representative cases are further investigated for economic feasibility analysis of zinc recovery from (1) steelmaking dust and (2) municipal solid waste (MSW). The amount and value of zinc that can be generated from dust emitted from various steelmaking technologies are estimated. Additional revenues for the steelmaking industrial sector (with electric arc furnace), at the plant, national (UK), regional (EU) and global levels are 11, 12, 169 and 1670 million tonne/y, or 19–143, 20–157, 287–2203 and 2834–21740 million €/y, respectively. The second case study entails an integrated mechanical biological treatment (MBT) system of MSW consisting of metal recovery technologies, anaerobic digestion, refuse derived fuel (RDF) incineration and combined heat and power (CHP) generation. An effective economic value analysis methodology has been adopted to analyse the techno-economic feasibility of the integrated MBT system. The value analysis shows that an additional economic margin of 500 € can be generated from the recovery of 1t of zinc in the integrated MBT system enhancing its overall economic margin by 9%.

Suggested Citation

  • Ng, Kok Siew & Head, Ian & Premier, Giuliano C. & Scott, Keith & Yu, Eileen & Lloyd, Jon & Sadhukhan, Jhuma, 2016. "A multilevel sustainability analysis of zinc recovery from wastes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 88-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:88-105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916301239
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ananda S. Prasad, 2020. "Zinc in Human Health," Chapters, in: Faik Atroshi (ed.), Personalized Medicine, in Relation to Redox State, Diet and Lifestyle, IntechOpen.
    2. Sadhukhan, Jhuma & Lloyd, Jon R. & Scott, Keith & Premier, Giuliano C. & Yu, Eileen H. & Curtis, Tom & Head, Ian M., 2016. "A critical review of integration analysis of microbial electrosynthesis (MES) systems with waste biorefineries for the production of biofuel and chemical from reuse of CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 116-132.
    3. Panepinto, D. & Blengini, G.A. & Genon, G., 2015. "Economic and environmental comparison between two scenarios of waste management: MBT vs thermal treatment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 16-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jadhav, Dipak A. & Ghosh Ray, Sreemoyee & Ghangrekar, Makarand M., 2017. "Third generation in bio-electrochemical system research – A systematic review on mechanisms for recovery of valuable by-products from wastewater," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1022-1031.
    2. Budzianowski, Wojciech M. & Postawa, Karol, 2016. "Total Chain Integration of sustainable biorefinery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1432-1446.
    3. Jiang, Yong & Yang, Xufei & Liang, Peng & Liu, Panpan & Huang, Xia, 2018. "Microbial fuel cell sensors for water quality early warning systems: Fundamentals, signal resolution, optimization and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 292-305.
    4. He, Li & Du, Peng & Chen, Yizhong & Lu, Hongwei & Cheng, Xi & Chang, Bei & Wang, Zheng, 2017. "Advances in microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 388-403.
    5. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Unni Krishnan, A., 2016. "Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 292-308.
    6. Cerrillo, Míriam & Viñas, Marc & Bonmatí, August, 2018. "Anaerobic digestion and electromethanogenic microbial electrolysis cell integrated system: Increased stability and recovery of ammonia and methane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 178-189.
    7. Mobolaji B. Shemfe & Siddharth Gadkari & Jhuma Sadhukhan, 2018. "Social Hotspot Analysis and Trade Policy Implications of the Use of Bioelectrochemical Systems for Resource Recovery from Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Shamaraz Firdous & Amanat Ali & Shahzad Anwar, 2018. "Optical Polarimatic Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanorods as a Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Therapy," Cancer Therapy & Oncology International Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, May.
    9. Sadhukhan, Jhuma & Martinez-Hernandez, Elias & Murphy, Richard J. & Ng, Denny K.S. & Hassim, Mimi H. & Siew Ng, Kok & Yoke Kin, Wan & Jaye, Ida Fahani Md & Leung Pah Hang, Melissa Y. & Andiappan, Vikn, 2018. "Role of bioenergy, biorefinery and bioeconomy in sustainable development: Strategic pathways for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1966-1987.
    10. Simeng Li & Gang Chen & Aavudai Anandhi, 2018. "Applications of Emerging Bioelectrochemical Technologies in Agricultural Systems: A Current Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Wenyan Xie & Qinghua Xue & Liangfei Niu & Ka-Wing Wong, 2020. "Zinc transporter SLC39A7 relieves zinc deficiency to suppress alternative macrophage activation and impairment of phagocytosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, July.
    12. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang, 2019. "Analyzing Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Scenarios in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities in Developing Countries: The Case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Jhuma Sadhukhan & Bruno G. Pollet & Miles Seaman, 2022. "Hydrogen Production and Storage: Analysing Integration of Photoelectrolysis, Electron Harvesting Lignocellulose, and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide-Fixing Biosynthesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Jhuma Sadhukhan, 2022. "Net-Zero Action Recommendations for Scope 3 Emission Mitigation Using Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Jhuma Sadhukhan & Kartik Sekar, 2022. "Economic Conditions to Circularize Clinical Plastics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:88-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.