IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v108y2016icp171-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle energy and material flow implications of gypsum plasterboard recycling in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Jiménez Rivero, Ana
  • Sathre, Roger
  • García Navarro, Justo

Abstract

Turning waste into a resource is a way to increase resource use efficiency and close the material loop of a circular economy. Gypsum plasterboard is well suited for this, because the raw material calcium sulphate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) can repeatedly change its properties through a reversible hydration reaction. The waste hierarchy is applied when plasterboard is recycled instead of landfilled, which contributes to the European 2020 target of 70% recovery of construction and demolition (C&D) waste, as defined in the Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste. This paper evaluates the energy and climate impacts of different levels of plasterboard recycling. First, we formulate a life cycle model of gypsum mass flows in the European Union (EU-27) in the reference year 2013. This model constitutes the basis of the quantitative scenario analysis. Secondly, we assess the material flows, energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in different recycling scenarios. We compare the current situation (“2013 base case”) to two scenarios: a worst case scenario of 0% recycled gypsum (“Zero recycling case”), and a best case scenario of zero gypsum waste sent to landfill, corresponding to 18.7% recycled gypsum in new plasterboard (“High recycling case”). We find no significant variation between scenarios in terms of life cycle energy use, as lower impacts from gypsum mining, transport of natural gypsum and final disposal in the best case scenario are balanced by the energy for the transport of plasterboard waste and recycled gypsum and for material pre-processing during manufacturing. In contrast, life cycle GHG emissions are lower as recycling increases, largely driven by the degradation of plasterboard lining paper in landfills.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiménez Rivero, Ana & Sathre, Roger & García Navarro, Justo, 2016. "Life cycle energy and material flow implications of gypsum plasterboard recycling in the European Union," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 171-181.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:108:y:2016:i:c:p:171-181
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916300143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emery, S.B. & Smith, D.N. & Gaterell, M.R. & Sammons, G. & Moon, D., 2007. "Estimation of the recycled content of an existing construction project," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 395-409.
    2. Herrero, M.J. & Escavy, J.I. & Bustillo, M., 2013. "The Spanish building crisis and its effect in the gypsum quarry production (1998–2012)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 123-129.
    3. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2010. "Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1152-1160.
    4. Villoria Sáez, Paola & del Río Merino, Mercedes & Porras-Amores, César & San-Antonio González, Alicia, 2014. "Assessing the accumulation of construction waste generation during residential building construction works," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 67-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rabbat, Christelle & Awad, Sary & Villot, Audrey & Rollet, Delphine & Andrès, Yves, 2022. "Sustainability of biomass-based insulation materials in buildings: Current status in France, end-of-life projections and energy recovery potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Rodríguez, Rosa M. & Labella, Álvaro & Nuñez-Cacho, Pedro & Molina-Moreno, Valentin & Martínez, Luis, 2022. "A comprehensive minimum cost consensus model for large scale group decision making for circular economy measurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Cyrine Mrad & Luís Frölén Ribeiro, 2022. "A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Kylili, Angeliki & Ilic, Milos & Fokaides, Paris A., 2017. "Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 169-177.
    5. Aitana Sáez-de-Guinoa & David Zambrana-Vasquez & Víctor Fernández & Carmen Bartolomé, 2022. "Circular Economy in the European Construction Sector: A Review of Strategies for Implementation in Building Renovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Jiménez-Rivero, Ana & García-Navarro, Justo, 2017. "Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 116-123.
    7. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2020. "European environment policy for the circular economy: Implications for business and industry stakeholders," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1804-1812, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Escavy, J.I. & Herrero, M.J. & Trigos, L. & Sanz-Pérez, E., 2020. "Demographic vs economic variables in the modelling and forecasting of the demand of aggregates: The case of the Spanish market (1995–2016)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Kylili, Angeliki & Ilic, Milos & Fokaides, Paris A., 2017. "Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 169-177.
    3. Vefago, Luiz H. Maccarini & Avellaneda, Jaume, 2013. "Recycling concepts and the index of recyclability for building materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 127-135.
    4. Schaffartzik, Anke & Duro, Juan Antonio, 2022. "‘Dematerialization’ in times of economic crisis: A regional analysis of the Spanish economy in material and monetary terms," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Marrero, Madelyn & Puerto, Manuel & Rivero-Camacho, Cristina & Freire-Guerrero, Antonio & Solís-Guzmán, Jaime, 2017. "Assessing the economic impact and ecological footprint of construction and demolition waste during the urbanization of rural land," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 160-174.
    6. Lachimpadi, Suresh Kumar & Pereira, Joy Jacqueline & Taha, Mohd Raihan & Mokhtar, Mazlin, 2012. "Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 96-103.
    7. Zubizarreta, Mikel & Cuadrado, Jesús & Iradi, Jon & García, Harkaitz & Orbe, Aimar, 2017. "Innovation evaluation model for macro-construction sector companies: A study in Spain," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-37.
    8. Escavy, J.I. & Herrero, M.J. & Lopez-Acevedo, F. & Trigos, L., 2022. "The progressive distancing of aggregate quarries from the demand areas: Magnitude, causes, and impact on CO2 emissions in Madrid Region (1995–2018)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Li, Yashuai & Zhang, Xueqing & Ding, Guoyu & Feng, Zhouquan, 2016. "Developing a quantitative construction waste estimation model for building construction projects," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 9-20.
    10. Syed Shujaa Safdar Gardezi & Nasir Shafiq & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan, 2022. "Relational pre-impact assessment of conventional housing features and carbon footprint for achieving sustainable built environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8441-8463, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:108:y:2016:i:c:p:171-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.