IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v102y2015icp163-169.html

Sustainability assessment of dismantling strategies for end-of-life aircraft recycling

Author

Listed:
  • Sabaghi, Mahdi
  • Cai, Yongliang
  • Mascle, Christian
  • Baptiste, Pierre

Abstract

With the current increase of environmental concerns, conventional methods practiced at end-of-life would not be capable to sustain the growing amount of retired aircrafts waiting for final disposal in the scrap yards each year. Material recycling is known as an important environmentally friendly activity. The quality of recycled material in a recycling process is actively influenced by an appropriate disassembly/dismantling strategy. In recycling the carcass of the aircraft, it is suitable to separate and classify different aluminum grades into their main alloys family before sending them to recycling center (i.e. 2xxx and 7xxx). However, due to complexity in the aircraft structure, fully disassembly/dismantling or fully shredding the aircraft is not economically or environmentally viable, respectively. For this reason, this work discusses eight different disassembly/dismantling strategies that have been done on a real Bombardier Regional Jet aircraft. The study narrows the gap in sustainability evaluation of these strategies by using an efficient fuzzy assessment method. Ten different risk scenarios were considered to have a robust understanding about the sustainability performance of each strategy. The methodology used in this work allowed to select the best strategy in terms of sustainable disassembly/dismantling.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabaghi, Mahdi & Cai, Yongliang & Mascle, Christian & Baptiste, Pierre, 2015. "Sustainability assessment of dismantling strategies for end-of-life aircraft recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 163-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:102:y:2015:i:c:p:163-169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300653
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Shen, Lixin & Olfat, Laya & Govindan, Kannan & Khodaverdi, Roohollah & Diabat, Ali, 2013. "A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 170-179.
    3. Kaya, İhsan, 2012. "Evaluation of outsourcing alternatives under fuzzy environment for waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 107-118.
    4. Dursun, Mehtap & Karsak, E. Ertugrul & Karadayi, Melis Almula, 2011. "Assessment of health-care waste treatment alternatives using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approaches," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-107.
    5. Simic, Vladimir, 2015. "A two-stage interval-stochastic programming model for planning end-of-life vehicles allocation under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 19-29.
    6. Kim, Yeonjoo & Chung, Eun-Sung & Jun, Sang-Mook & Kim, Sang Ug, 2013. "Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater instream use in an urban watershed using fuzzy TOPSIS," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 23-32.
    7. Gaustad, Gabrielle & Olivetti, Elsa & Kirchain, Randolph, 2012. "Improving aluminum recycling: A survey of sorting and impurity removal technologies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 79-87.
    8. Asmatulu, Eylem & Twomey, Janet & Overcash, Michael, 2013. "Evaluation of recycling efforts of aircraft companies in Wichita," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 36-45.
    9. Li, Zhong & Huang, Gordon & Zhang, Yimei & Li, Yongping, 2013. "Inexact two-stage stochastic credibility constrained programming for water quality management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 122-132.
    10. Liu, J. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Zeng, X.T., 2014. "A dual-interval fixed-mix stochastic programming method for water resources management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 50-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baldassarre, Brian, 2025. "Circular economy for resource security in the European Union (EU): Case study, research framework, and future directions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Guihong Zhao & Xintong Zhai & Yuzi Jing, 2023. "Retired Aircraft Recovery: Based on Stackelberg Game Method from the Perspective of Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Rodrigues Dias, Veruska Mazza & Jugend, Daniel & de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Razzino, Carlos do Amaral & Paula Pinheiro, Marco Antonio, 2022. "Possibilities for applying the circular economy in the aerospace industry: Practices, opportunities and challenges," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Aikaterini Anagnostopoulou & Dimitris Sotiropoulos & Konstantinos Tserpes, 2025. "A Robust Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Aircraft Parts: Application to a Fuselage Panel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-33, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gdoura, Khadija & Anane, Makram & Jellali, Salah, 2015. "Geospatial and AHP-multicriteria analyses to locate and rank suitable sites for groundwater recharge with reclaimed water," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 19-30.
    2. Tu, Yan & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Gang, Jun & Liechty, Merrill & Xu, Jiuping & Lev, Benjamin, 2015. "Administrative and market-based allocation mechanism for regional water resources planning," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 156-173.
    3. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    5. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    6. de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge, 2007. "Claim reserving with fuzzy regression and Taylor's geometric separation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 145-163, January.
    7. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    8. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2015. "A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 933-941.
    10. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kato, Kosuke, 1998. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for structured multiobjective linear fractional programs with fuzzy numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 575-589, June.
    11. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Bogdana Stanojević & Milan Stanojević & Sorin Nădăban, 2021. "Reinstatement of the Extension Principle in Approaching Mathematical Programming with Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Svajone Bekesiene & Serhii Mashchenko, 2023. "On Nash Equilibria in a Finite Game for Fuzzy Sets of Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Qian-Yun Tan & Cui-Ping Wei & Qi Liu & Xiang-Qian Feng, 2016. "The Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method Based on Novel Information Measures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(05), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Lin, Jiayu & Pan, Dongliang & Sha, Yezhou, 2025. "The impact of ESG investment on fund performance: Evidence from mutual fund style drift," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Hsiao, Tzy-yih, 2006. "Establish standards of standard costing with the application of convergent gray zone test," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 593-611, January.
    17. Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli & Colmenero, João Carlos & Aragão, Franciely Velozo & Rodrigues, Thaisa & Junior, Aldo Braghini, 2020. "Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    18. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Madjid Tavana & Kobra Gholami & Zahra Ghelej Beigi, 2015. "A Bounded Data Envelopment Analysis Model in a Fuzzy Environment with an Application to Safety in the Semiconductor Industry," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 679-701, February.
    19. Manuel Casal-Guisande & Alberto Comesaña-Campos & Alejandro Pereira & José-Benito Bouza-Rodríguez & Jorge Cerqueiro-Pequeño, 2022. "A Decision-Making Methodology Based on Expert Systems Applied to Machining Tools Condition Monitoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, February.
    20. James Liou & Mei-Ling Chuang, 2010. "Evaluating corporate image and reputation using fuzzy MCDM approach in airline market," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1079-1091, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:102:y:2015:i:c:p:163-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.