IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v284y2025ics0925527325001008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Third-party logistics outsourcing: A review of two decades of advancing decision-making approaches with an up-to-date three-layer criteria framework integrating environmental, social, and governance metrics

Author

Listed:
  • Dang, Viet Linh
  • Wan, Shuping
  • Guo, Jiequn

Abstract

Selecting third-party logistics (3PL) providers is a crucial strategic decision for organizations seeking to enhance supply chain performance in today's dynamic business environment. This study explores the advancement of decision-making approaches for 3PL outsourcing, analysing 121 research articles published from 2002 to 2024. Through a comprehensive systematic literature review supported by descriptive and keyword co-occurrence analyses, the study identifies three primary methodological approaches: Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Mathematical Programming (MP), and Artificial Intelligence (AI), with MCDM emerging as the most preferred approach. These methodologies show promising advancements in addressing traditional limitations, adopting data-driven approaches, integrating hybrid methods, managing uncertainty, and refining criteria development processes. Based on an analysis of 1662 selection criteria from the literature, the study proposes an up-to-date and universally applicable three-layer criteria framework focusing on five key aspects: Business Strength and Prestige, Service Excellence, Cost and Pricing, Technology Capabilities, and Sustainability (measured by Environmental, Social, and Governance metrics). This framework, enhanced by insights from industry experts and top 3PL companies, reflects a shift toward more holistic 3PL evaluation and selection. The study contributes to decision science and management literature while providing valuable insights for supply chain professionals, concluding with suggestions for future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dang, Viet Linh & Wan, Shuping & Guo, Jiequn, 2025. "Third-party logistics outsourcing: A review of two decades of advancing decision-making approaches with an up-to-date three-layer criteria framework integrating environmental, social, and governance m," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:284:y:2025:i:c:s0925527325001008
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001008
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Słowiński, Roman, 2013. "Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 820-846.
    2. Rakesh D. Raut & Bhaskar B. Gardas & Shamik Pushkar & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2019. "Third-party logistics service providers selection and evaluation: a hybrid AHP-DEA-COPRAS-G group decision-making approach," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(6), pages 632-651.
    3. Yayi Yuan & Zeshui Xu & Yixin Zhang, 2022. "The DEMATEL–COPRAS hybrid method under probabilistic linguistic environment and its application in Third Party Logistics provider selection," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    4. Govindan, Kannan & Kadziński, Miłosz & Ehling, Ronja & Miebs, Grzegorz, 2019. "Selection of a sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider based on the robustness analysis of an outranking graph kernel conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Aguezzoul, Aicha, 2014. "Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 69-78.
    6. Zhi Wen & Huchang Liao & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Abdullah Al-Barakati, 2019. "Selection third-party logistics service providers in supply chain finance by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 4033-4058, January.
    7. Kotarba Marcin, 2018. "Digital Transformation of Business Models," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 123-142, July.
    8. Yalcin, Ahmet Selcuk & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk & Delen, Dursun, 2022. "The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Navid Zarbakhshnia & Kannan Govindan & Devika Kannan & Mark Goh, 2023. "Outsourcing logistics operations in circular economy towards to sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 134-162, January.
    10. Liu, Chiung-Lin & Lyons, Andrew C., 2011. "An analysis of third-party logistics performance and service provision," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 547-570, July.
    11. Jharkharia, Sanjay & Shankar, Ravi, 2007. "Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 274-289, June.
    12. Ankit Bansal & Pravin Kumar, 2013. "3PL selection using hybrid model of AHP-PROMETHEE," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 373-397.
    13. Umair Akram & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Dan Ioan Topor & Sorinel Căpușneanu, 2021. "Impact of Digitalization on Customers’ Well-Being in the Pandemic Period: Challenges and Opportunities for the Retail Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Adile Yesim Yayla & Asil Oztekin & Alev Taskin Gumus & Angappa Gunasekaran, 2015. "A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6097-6113, October.
    15. Nirupam Choudhury & Rakesh D. Raut & Bhaskar B. Gardas & Manoj G. Kharat & Sankalp Ichake, 2018. "Evaluation and selection of third party logistics services providers using data envelopment analysis: a sustainable approach," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 427-453.
    16. Phuoc Luong Le & Imen Jarroudi & Thien-My Dao & Amin Chaabane, 2021. "Integrated construction supply chain: an optimal decision-making model with third-party logistics partnership," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 133-155, February.
    17. Reza Farzipoor Saen, 2009. "A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 180-190.
    18. Jagannath Roy & Dragan Pamučar & Samarjit Kar, 2020. "Evaluation and selection of third party logistics provider under sustainability perspectives: an interval valued fuzzy-rough approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 669-714, October.
    19. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2023. "Sustainable Evaluation of Major Third-Party Logistics Providers: A Framework of an MCDM-Based Entropy Objective Weighting Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Thomas Hanne & Juan Carlos Osorio Gómez & Jorge Luis García Alcaraz, 2018. "Finding the Best Third-Party Logistics in the Automobile Industry: A Hybrid Approach," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-19, November.
    21. Bang-Ning Hwang & Yung-Chi Shen, 2015. "Decision Making for Third Party Logistics Supplier Selection in Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry: A Nonadditive Fuzzy Integral Approach," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-12, February.
    22. Konstantinos Selviaridis & Martin Spring & Vassilios Profillidis & George Botzoris, 2008. "Benefits, Risks, Selection Criteria and Success Factors for Third-Party Logistics Services," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(4), pages 380-392, December.
    23. Pietro Evangelista & Lodovico Santoro & Antonio Thomas, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review from 2000–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-34, May.
    24. Marasco, Alessandra, 2008. "Third-party logistics: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 127-147, May.
    25. Frank Michael Theunissen & Carel Nicolaas Bezuidenhout & Shafiq Alam, 2024. "Exploring the shortcomings in formal criteria selection for multicriteria decision making based inventory classification models: a systematic review and future directions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(19), pages 7279-7299, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Third-Party Logistics Services Providers (3PLSP) Selection for Supply Chain Strategic Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Faruk Görçün, Ömer. & Chatterjee, Prasenjit. & Stević, Željko. & Küçükönder, Hande., 2024. "An integrated model for road freight transport firm selection in third-party logistics using T-spherical Fuzzy sets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Kannan Govindan & Vernika Agarwal & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & P. C. Jha, 2019. "An integrated decision making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 607-650, February.
    4. Anchal Gupta & Rajesh Kumar Singh & Sachin Kr Mangla, 2022. "Evaluation of logistics providers for sustainable service quality: Analytics based decision making framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1617-1664, August.
    5. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Chen-Ming Lu, 2021. "A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Vijayta Fulzele & Ravi Shankar, 2023. "Performance measurement of sustainable freight transportation: a consensus model and FERA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 501-542, May.
    7. Hosang Jung, 2017. "Evaluation of Third Party Logistics Providers Considering Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Govindan, Kannan & Kadziński, Miłosz & Ehling, Ronja & Miebs, Grzegorz, 2019. "Selection of a sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider based on the robustness analysis of an outranking graph kernel conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2023. "Sustainable Evaluation of Major Third-Party Logistics Providers: A Framework of an MCDM-Based Entropy Objective Weighting Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Shen, Bin & Xu, Xiaoyan & Guo, Shu, 2019. "The impacts of logistics services on short life cycle products in a global supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 153-167.
    11. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    12. Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2011. "Assessing performance factors for a 3PL in a value chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 441-452, June.
    13. Remica Aggarwal & S. P. Singh, 2019. "An integrated NPV-based supply chain configuration with third-party logistics services," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(5), pages 367-375, October.
    14. Mohamed Abdel-Basset & Abduallah Gamal & Mohamed Elhoseny & Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Michael Ryan, 2021. "A Conceptual Hybrid Approach from a Multicriteria Perspective for Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider Identification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, April.
    15. Jagannath Roy & Dragan Pamučar & Samarjit Kar, 2020. "Evaluation and selection of third party logistics provider under sustainability perspectives: an interval valued fuzzy-rough approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 669-714, October.
    16. Pal Singh, Satender & Adhikari, Arnab & Majumdar, Adrija & Bisi, Arnab, 2022. "Does service quality influence operational and financial performance of third party logistics service providers? A mixed multi criteria decision making -text mining-based investigation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Yu-Lan Wang & Chin-Nung Liao, 2023. "Assessment of Sustainable Reverse Logistic Provider Using the Fuzzy TOPSIS and MSGP Framework in Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Huchang Liao & Di Wu & Yulong Huang & Peijia Ren & Zeshui Xu & Mohit Verma, 2018. "Green Logistic Provider Selection with a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Thermodynamic Method Integrating Cumulative Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Yan Pan & Yanzhe Li & Shouzhen Zeng & Junfang Hu & Kifayat Ullah, 2022. "Green Recycling Supplier Selection of Shared Bicycles: Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Hybrid Weighted Methods Based on Self-Confidence Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Gu, Wei & Yu, Xiaoru & Zhang, Shichen & Yan, Xiangbin & Wang, Chen, 2023. "To outsource or not: Bike-share rebalancing strategies under the service quality deviation of a third party," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 847-859.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:284:y:2025:i:c:s0925527325001008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.