IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v218y2019icp170-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common replenishment cycle order policies for multiple products with capacity expansion opportunities and quantity discounts

Author

Listed:
  • Jackson, Jonathan E.
  • Munson, Charles L.

Abstract

Many companies face the challenge of maintaining hundreds, if not thousands, of items in inventory, where each product draws from a common resource (e.g., warehouse space). The introduction of this common resource constraint complicates the traditional lot-sizing problem due to the interdependencies of the lot sizes. This challenge intensifies when the firm can adjust the capacity of the common resource and with the presence of quantity discounts, which may encourage the company to increase lot sizes. This paper develops efficient solutions for a constrained, multi-product lot-sizing problem with a common replenishment cycle, all-units quantity discounts, and a flexible common resource capacity. Historically, the common replenishment cycle (similar to the popular periodic review inventory system) excels in convenience but tends to lag behind in cost effectiveness. We extend the traditional common replenishment cycle approach through the introduction of a refinement policy that allows for more flexibility in the lot-sizing decisions. This modification allows companies to leverage quantity discounts for certain items without detrimental increases to the required common resource capacity (by increasing the cycle length). Via numerical examples and sensitivity analysis, we identify situations where the common replenishment cycle approach with refinement policy outperforms the alternative independent cycles approach in both convenience and cost. Good candidate companies include (1) a growing retailer, (2) a factory with limited storage space, (3) a retailer without secondary warehouse space, (4) a company purchasing bulky items, and (5) a firm located in an expensive city with premium storage space costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackson, Jonathan E. & Munson, Charles L., 2019. "Common replenishment cycle order policies for multiple products with capacity expansion opportunities and quantity discounts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 170-184.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:218:y:2019:i:c:p:170-184
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319301665
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Perboli, Guido, 2018. "The Capacitated Supplier Selection problem with Total Quantity Discount policy and Activation Costs under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 119-132.
    2. Shi, Jianmai & Zhang, Guoqing, 2010. "Multi-product budget-constrained acquisition and pricing with uncertain demand and supplier quantity discounts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 322-331, November.
    3. Haksever, Cengiz & Moussourakis, John, 2005. "A model for optimizing multi-product inventory systems with multiple constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 18-30, July.
    4. Meir J. Rosenblatt & Uriel G. Rothblum, 1990. "On the Single Resource Capacity Problem for Multi-Item Inventory Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 686-693, August.
    5. Munson, C.L. & Hu, J., 2010. "Incorporating quantity discounts and their inventory impacts into the centralized purchasing decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 581-592, March.
    6. Haksever, Cengiz & Moussourakis, John, 2008. "Determining order quantities in multi-product inventory systems subject to multiple constraints and incremental discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 930-945, February.
    7. Zhang, Guoqing, 2010. "The multi-product newsboy problem with supplier quantity discounts and a budget constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 350-360, October.
    8. Nicholas G. Hall, 1988. "A multi‐item EOQ model with inventory cycle balancing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 319-325, June.
    9. Rubin, Paul A. & Benton, W. C., 2003. "Evaluating jointly constrained order quantity complexities for incremental discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 557-570, September.
    10. Lu, Qihui & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2018. "Capacity expansion investment of supplier under make-to-order and make-to-stock supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 133-148.
    11. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Pentico, David W., 2014. "An Economic Order Quantity model with partial backordering and all-units discount," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 172-184.
    12. Jackson, Jonathan E. & Munson, Charles L., 2016. "Shared resource capacity expansion decisions for multiple products with quantity discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 602-613.
    13. Fan, Jie & Wang, Guoqing, 2018. "Joint optimization of dynamic lot and warehouse sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 849-854.
    14. Majid Al‐Gwaiz & Xiuli Chao & H. Edwin Romeijn, 2016. "Capacity expansion and cost efficiency improvement in the warehouse problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(5), pages 367-373, August.
    15. Tamjidzad, Shahrzad & Mirmohammadi, S. Hamid, 2015. "An optimal (r, Q) policy in a stochastic inventory system with all-units quantity discount and limited sharable resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 93-100.
    16. Benton, W. C. & Park, Seungwook, 1996. "A classification of literature on determining the lot size under quantity discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 219-238, July.
    17. Feng, Xuehao & Moon, Ilkyeong & Ryu, Kwangyeol, 2017. "Warehouse capacity sharing via transshipment for an integrated two-echelon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 17-35.
    18. Minner, Stefan & Silver, Edward A., 2007. "Replenishment policies for multiple products with compound-Poisson demand that share a common warehouse," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 388-398, July.
    19. Paul A. Rubin & W. C. Benton, 1993. "Jointly constrained order quantities with all‐units discounts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 255-278, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jackson, Jonathan E. & Munson, Charles L., 2016. "Shared resource capacity expansion decisions for multiple products with quantity discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 602-613.
    2. Tamjidzad, Shahrzad & Mirmohammadi, S. Hamid, 2015. "An optimal (r, Q) policy in a stochastic inventory system with all-units quantity discount and limited sharable resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 93-100.
    3. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2019. "Encroachment and canvassing strategy in a sea-cargo service chain with empty container repositioning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 175-186.
    4. Kirschstein, Thomas & Meisel, Frank, 2019. "A multi-period multi-commodity lot-sizing problem with supplier selection, storage selection and discounts for the process industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 393-406.
    5. Haksever, Cengiz & Moussourakis, John, 2008. "Determining order quantities in multi-product inventory systems subject to multiple constraints and incremental discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 930-945, February.
    6. Pal, Brojeswar & Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2012. "Multi-item EOQ model while demand is sales price and price break sensitive," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 2283-2288.
    7. Zhang, Guoqing & Shi, Jianmai & Chaudhry, Sohail S. & Li, Xindan, 2019. "Multi-period multi-product acquisition planning with uncertain demands and supplier quantity discounts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 117-140.
    8. San-José, Luis A. & García-Laguna, Juan, 2009. "Optimal policy for an inventory system with backlogging and all-units discounts: Application to the composite lot size model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 808-823, February.
    9. Qin, Hu & Luo, Meifeng & Gao, Xiang & Lim, Andrew, 2012. "The freight allocation problem with all-units quantity-based discount: A heuristic algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 415-423.
    10. Wang, Huihui & Yu, Yimin & Zhang, Wei & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2019. "Procurement strategies for lost-sales inventory systems with all-units discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 539-548.
    11. Aria Shahsavar & Nima Zoraghi & Babak Abbasi, 2018. "Integration of resource investment problem with quantity discount problem in material ordering for minimizing resource costs of projects," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 315-342, July.
    12. Burke, Gerard J. & Carrillo, Janice & Vakharia, Asoo J., 2008. "Heuristics for sourcing from multiple suppliers with alternative quantity discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 317-329, April.
    13. Serel, Doğan A., 2012. "Multi-item quick response system with budget constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 235-249.
    14. Feng Tao & Yanhong Xie & Yao-Yu Wang & Fujun Lai & Kin Keung Lai, 2022. "Contract strategies in competitive supply chains subject to inventory inaccuracy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 641-661, February.
    15. Yong Zhang & Xingyu Yang & Weiguo Zhang & Weiwei Chen, 2020. "Online ordering rules for the multi-period newsvendor problem with quantity discounts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 495-524, May.
    16. Yang, Liu & Millstein, Mitch A. & Campbell, James F., 2022. "Unlocking cost savings hidden in hospital tier contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    17. Li, Zhaolin & Ou, Jinwen & Liang, Guitian, 2021. "Optimizing hospital drug procurement with rebate contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    18. Zissis, Dimitris & Ioannou, George & Burnetas, Apostolos, 2015. "Supply chain coordination under discrete information asymmetries and quantity discounts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 21-29.
    19. Munson, C.L. & Hu, J., 2010. "Incorporating quantity discounts and their inventory impacts into the centralized purchasing decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 581-592, March.
    20. Wang, Daao & Dimitrov, Stanko & Jian, Lirong, 2020. "Optimal inventory decisions for a risk-averse retailer when offering layaway," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 108-120.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:218:y:2019:i:c:p:170-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.