IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v188y2017icp22-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling age replacement policy under multiple time scales and stochastic usage profiles

Author

Listed:
  • Diaz, Nicole
  • Pascual, Rodrigo
  • Ruggeri, Fabrizio
  • López Droguett, Enrique

Abstract

This paper offers an original methodology to set multi-dimensional maintenance policies for machines whose aging processes require using multiple time scales. It can be considered a generalization of the traditional approach, that usually employs a unique time scale and sets a single age limit to carry out preventive maintenance actions. The methodology also considers situations in which a set of machines are operated using multiple usage profiles. We define usage profile as the relationship between the use of a machine in terms of one main time scale and another scale. In our case study the age of a mining haul-truck component can be best modeled as a combination of operating hours and load cycles since the last overhaul. We compare the results obtained with respect to using a single time scale policy. The comparison shows the importance of the bias in decision making that may arise due to incomplete modelling of the components' aging process.

Suggested Citation

  • Diaz, Nicole & Pascual, Rodrigo & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & López Droguett, Enrique, 2017. "Modelling age replacement policy under multiple time scales and stochastic usage profiles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 22-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:188:y:2017:i:c:p:22-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527317300683
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, R. & Jardine, A.K.S., 2006. "Composite scale modeling in the presence of censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(7), pages 756-764.
    2. Al-Najjar, Basim & Alsyouf, Imad, 2003. "Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 85-100, April.
    3. Pascual, R. & Meruane, V. & Rey, P.A., 2008. "On the effect of downtime costs and budget constraint on preventive and replacement policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 144-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milton Fonseca Junior & Ubiratan Holanda Bezerra & Jandecy Cabral Leite & Jorge Laureano Moya Rodríguez, 2017. "Maintenance Tools applied to Electric Generators to Improve Energy Efficiency and Power Quality of Thermoelectric Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinjala, Srinivas Kumar & Pintelon, Liliane & Vereecke, Ann, 2006. "An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 214-229, November.
    2. Hsu-Lin Chen & Yi-Chung Hu & Ming-Yen Lee, 2021. "Evaluating Appointment of Division Managers Using Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Jiang, R., 2010. "Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 208-215.
    4. Baraldi, Piero & Podofillini, Luca & Mkrtchyan, Lusine & Zio, Enrico & Dang, Vinh N., 2015. "Comparing the treatment of uncertainty in Bayesian networks and fuzzy expert systems used for a human reliability analysis application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 176-193.
    5. Markus Bohlin & Mathias Wärja, 2015. "Maintenance optimization with duration-dependent costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 224(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. María Carmen Carnero & Andrés Gómez, 2019. "Optimization of Decision Making in the Supply of Medicinal Gases Used in Health Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, May.
    7. Wu, Kuo-Jui & Liao, Ching-Jong & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2015. "Exploring decisive factors in green supply chain practices under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 147-157.
    8. K A H Kobbacy & S Vadera & M H Rasmy, 2007. "AI and OR in management of operations: history and trends," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(1), pages 10-28, January.
    9. Priyank Srivastava & Dinesh Khanduja & V. P. Agrawal, 2020. "Agile maintenance attribute coding and evaluation based decision making in sugar manufacturing plant," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(2), pages 553-583, June.
    10. Huang, Weilun & Zhang, Qi, 2020. "Selecting the optimal economic crop in minority regions with the criteria about soil and water conservation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Andrea Trianni & Davide Accordini & Enrico Cagno, 2020. "Identification and Categorization of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures within Compressed Air Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-51, October.
    12. Ioannis Dagkinis & Nikitas Nikitakos, 2013. "Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 63(3-4), pages 26-36, July.
    13. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Tseng, Yi-Hong, 2006. "Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 353-368, June.
    14. Al-Najjar, Basim, 2007. "The lack of maintenance and not maintenance which costs: A model to describe and quantify the impact of vibration-based maintenance on company's business," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 260-273, May.
    15. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Wu, Jun, 2007. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 151-163, May.
    16. Jiang, R., 2013. "A multivariate CBM model with a random and time-dependent failure threshold," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 178-185.
    17. Alsyouf, Imad, 2009. "Maintenance practices in Swedish industries: Survey results," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 212-223, September.
    18. Hariharan, Naveen Kunnathuvalappil, 2019. "Maintaining Financial Data Quality For Business Intelligence," OSF Preprints w7n26, Center for Open Science.
    19. Dowlatshahi, Shad, 2008. "The role of industrial maintenance in the maquiladora industry: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 298-307, July.
    20. Chan, F. T. S. & Lau, H. C. W. & Ip, R. W. L. & Chan, H. K. & Kong, S., 2005. "Implementation of total productive maintenance: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 71-94, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:188:y:2017:i:c:p:22-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.