IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v127y2010i1p112-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward the fair sharing of profit in a supply network formation

Author

Listed:
  • Hennet, Jean-Claude
  • Mahjoub, Sonia

Abstract

The design of a supply chain network can be interpreted as a coalition formation problem in a cooperative game theory and formulated as a linear production game (LPG). The companies that are members of the optimal coalition share their manufacturing assets and resources to produce a set of end-products and globally maximize their profits by selling them in a market. This paper investigates the possibility of combining the requirement of coalition stability with a fair allocation of profits to the participants. It is shown that, in general, the purely competitive allocation mechanism does not exhibit the property of fairness. A technique is proposed to construct a stable and fair allocation system when the core of the game does not exclusively contain a set of competitive allocations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hennet, Jean-Claude & Mahjoub, Sonia, 2010. "Toward the fair sharing of profit in a supply network formation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 112-120, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:127:y:2010:i:1:p:112-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(10)00181-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G Reinhardt & M Dada, 2005. "Allocating the gains from resource pooling with the Shapley Value," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 997-1000, August.
    2. Charles, Shannon L. & Hansen, Don R., 2008. "An evaluation of activity-based costing and functional-based costing: A game-theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 282-296, May.
    3. Charles, Shannon L. & Hansen, Don R., 2008. "An evaluation of activity-based costing and functional-based costing: A game-theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 480-494, May.
    4. Dov Samet & Eitan Zemel, 1984. "On the Core and Dual Set of Linear Programming Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 309-316, May.
    5. Nagarajan, Mahesh & Sosic, Greys, 2008. "Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 719-745, June.
    6. Jin, Mingzhou & Wu, S. David, 2006. "Supplier coalitions in on-line reverse auctions: Validity requirements and profit distribution scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 183-194, April.
    7. Vito Fragnelli & Fioravante Patrone & Enrico Sideri & Stef Tijs, 1999. "Balanced games arising from infinite linear models," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 50(3), pages 385-397, December.
    8. Shapley, Lloyd S. & Shubik, Martin, 1969. "On market games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 9-25, June.
    9. Grubbstrom, Robert W. & Thu Thuy Huynh, Thi, 2006. "Multi-level, multi-stage capacity-constrained production-inventory systems in discrete time with non-zero lead times using MRP theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 53-62, May.
    10. Daniel Granot & Greys Sošić, 2003. "A Three-Stage Model for a Decentralized Distribution System of Retailers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 771-784, October.
    11. Kilpi, Jani & Töyli, Juuso & Vepsäläinen, Ari, 2009. "Cooperative strategies for the availability service of repairable aircraft components," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 360-370, February.
    12. Arda, Yasemin & Hennet, Jean-Claude, 2006. "Inventory control in a multi-supplier system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 249-259, December.
    13. Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2000. "The Owen Set and the Core of Semi-Infinite Linear Production Situations," Discussion Paper 2000-49, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. van Gellekom, J. R. G. & Potters, J. A. M. & Reijnierse, J. H. & Engel, M. C. & Tijs, S. H., 2000. "Characterization of the Owen Set of Linear Production Processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 139-156, July.
    15. Tijs, S.H. & van Gellekom, J.R.G. & Potters, J.A.M. & Reijnierse, J.H. & Engel, M.C., 2000. "Characterization of the Owen set of linear production processes," Other publications TiSEM bdf0c618-e9f1-496a-b977-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Shinya Sekizaki & Kenta Tanaka, 2023. "Averaged dual solution for linear production games and its characterization," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 523-555, June.
    2. Bruno Durand & Sonia Mahjoub & Marie-Pascale Senkel, 2014. "Deliveries of the urban internet users : The last mile mutualization in the light of the games theory [La livraison des internautes urbains : La mutualisation du dernier kilomètre à la lumière de l," Post-Print hal-01812875, HAL.
    3. Palsule-Desai, Omkar D. & Tirupati, Devanath & Chandra, Pankaj, 2013. "Stability issues in supply chain networks: Implications for coordination mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 179-193.
    4. Zhou, Wei & Zhang, Keang & Zhang, Ying & Duan, Yunlong, 2021. "Operation strategies with respect to insurance subsidy optimization for online retailers dealing with large items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Schulze, Manuel & Seuring, Stefan & Ewering, Christian, 2012. "Applying activity-based costing in a supply chain environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 716-725.
    6. Mohebbi, Shima & Li, Xueping, 2015. "Coalitional game theory approach to modeling suppliers' collaboration in supply networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 333-342.
    7. Guihua Wang & Quan Guo & Qiong Jiang & Butong Li, 2022. "A Study on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Supply Chain Profit Distribution in the Context of Common Prosperity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Sonia Mahjoub & Jean-Claude Hennet, 2014. "Manufacturers’ Coalition under a Price Elastic Market - a Quadratic Production Game Approach," Post-Print hal-01479690, HAL.
    9. An, Qingxian & Wen, Yao & Ding, Tao & Li, Yongli, 2019. "Resource sharing and payoff allocation in a three-stage system: Integrating network DEA with the Shapley value method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 16-25.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Gutierrez & Natividad Llorca & Manuel Mosquera & Joaquin Sanchez-Soriano, 2019. "On horizontal cooperation in linear production processes with a supplier that controls a limited resource," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(2), pages 169-196, October.
    2. Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2000. "The Owen Set and the Core of Semi-Infinite Linear Production Situations," Discussion Paper 2000-49, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    4. Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2000. "The Owen Set and the Core of Semi-Infinite Linear Production Situations," Other publications TiSEM c28286c5-deeb-4e8a-b8dd-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Yuki Shintomi, 2016. "A core-allocation for a network restricted linear production game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 389-410, March.
    6. Vito Fragnelli & Gianfranco Gambarelli, 2014. "Further open problems in cooperative games," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 24(4), pages 51-62.
    7. Borrero, D.V. & Hinojosa, M.A. & Mármol, A.M., 2016. "DEA production games and Owen allocations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 921-930.
    8. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Shinya Sekizaki & Kenta Tanaka, 2023. "Averaged dual solution for linear production games and its characterization," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 523-555, June.
    9. Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Llorca, N. & Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B., 2000. "Semi-Infinite Assignment and Transportation Games," Discussion Paper 2000-43, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2022. "The effect of consolidated periods in heterogeneous lot-sizing games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 380-404, July.
    11. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Yuki Shintomi, 2016. "A core-allocation for a network restricted linear production game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 389-410, March.
    12. Sanchez-Soriano, Joaquin & Llorca, Natividad & Tijs, Stef & Timmer, Judith, 2002. "On the core of semi-infinite transportation games with divisible goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 463-475, November.
    13. van Beek, Andries, 2023. "Solutions in multi-actor projects with collaboration and strategic incentives," Other publications TiSEM 3739c498-5edb-442f-87d8-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Llorca, N. & Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B., 2000. "On the Core of Semi-Infinite Transportation Games with Divisible Goods," Other publications TiSEM 469d59c1-b26f-402e-9cf0-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2009. "Production-inventory games: A new class of totally balanced combinatorial optimization games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 205-219, January.
    16. Jiawei Zhang, 2009. "Cost Allocation for Joint Replenishment Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 146-156, February.
    17. Mohebbi, Shima & Li, Xueping, 2015. "Coalitional game theory approach to modeling suppliers' collaboration in supply networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 333-342.
    18. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2008. "Production-inventory games and PMAS-games: Characterizations of the Owen point," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 96-108, July.
    19. van Beek, Andries & Malmberg, Benjamin & Borm, Peter & Quant, Marieke & Schouten, Jop, 2023. "Competition and cooperation in linear production and sequencing processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 117-132.
    20. Sanchez-Soriano, Joaquin, 2006. "Pairwise solutions and the core of transportation situations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 101-110, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:127:y:2010:i:1:p:112-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.