IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v2y2015icp62-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of simheuristics: Extending metaheuristics to deal with stochastic combinatorial optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Juan, Angel A.
  • Faulin, Javier
  • Grasman, Scott E.
  • Rabe, Markus
  • Figueira, Gonçalo

Abstract

Many combinatorial optimization problems (COPs) encountered in real-world logistics, transportation, production, healthcare, financial, telecommunication, and computing applications are NP-hard in nature. These real-life COPs are frequently characterized by their large-scale sizes and the need for obtaining high-quality solutions in short computing times, thus requiring the use of metaheuristic algorithms. Metaheuristics benefit from different random-search and parallelization paradigms, but they frequently assume that the problem inputs, the underlying objective function, and the set of optimization constraints are deterministic. However, uncertainty is all around us, which often makes deterministic models oversimplified versions of real-life systems. After completing an extensive review of related work, this paper describes a general methodology that allows for extending metaheuristics through simulation to solve stochastic COPs. ‘Simheuristics’ allow modelers for dealing with real-life uncertainty in a natural way by integrating simulation (in any of its variants) into a metaheuristic-driven framework. These optimization-driven algorithms rely on the fact that efficient metaheuristics already exist for the deterministic version of the corresponding COP. Simheuristics also facilitate the introduction of risk and/or reliability analysis criteria during the assessment of alternative high-quality solutions to stochastic COPs. Several examples of applications in different fields illustrate the potential of the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan, Angel A. & Faulin, Javier & Grasman, Scott E. & Rabe, Markus & Figueira, Gonçalo, 2015. "A review of simheuristics: Extending metaheuristics to deal with stochastic combinatorial optimization problems," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 62-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:2:y:2015:i:c:p:62-72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2015.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471601500007X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2015.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angel Juan & Javier Faulin & Josep Jorba & Jose Caceres & Joan Marquès, 2013. "Using parallel & distributed computing for real-time solving of vehicle routing problems with stochastic demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 43-65, August.
    2. J Soeiro Ferreira, 2013. "Multimethodology in Metaheuristics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(6), pages 873-883, June.
    3. Christian Almeder & Margaretha Preusser & Richard F. Hartl, 2009. "Simulation and optimization of supply chains: alternative or complementary approaches?," Springer Books, in: Herbert Meyr & Hans-Otto Günther (ed.), Supply Chain Planning, pages 29-53, Springer.
    4. G. Guerkan & A.Y. Oezge & S.M. Robinson, 1994. "Sample-Path Optimization in Simulation," Working Papers wp94070, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    5. Baker, Kenneth R. & Altheimer, Dominik, 2012. "Heuristic solution methods for the stochastic flow shop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 172-177.
    6. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    7. Justin C. Goodson & Jeffrey W. Ohlmann & Barrett W. Thomas, 2013. "Rollout Policies for Dynamic Solutions to the Multivehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Demand and Duration Limits," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 138-154, February.
    8. Gansterer, Margaretha & Almeder, Christian & Hartl, Richard F., 2014. "Simulation-based optimization methods for setting production planning parameters," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 206-213.
    9. Faulin, Javier & Juan, Angel A. & Serrat, Carles & Bargueño, Vicente, 2008. "Predicting availability functions in time-dependent complex systems with SAEDES simulation algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1761-1771.
    10. Almeder, Christian & Hartl, Richard F., 2013. "A metaheuristic optimization approach for a real-world stochastic flexible flow shop problem with limited buffer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 88-95.
    11. Saul I. Gass & Arjang A. Assad, 2005. "Model World: Tales from the Time Line—The Definition of OR and the Origins of Monte Carlo Simulation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 429-435, October.
    12. Hemmelmayr, Vera & Doerner, Karl F. & Hartl, Richard F. & Savelsbergh, Martin W.P., 2010. "Vendor managed inventory for environments with stochastic product usage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 686-695, May.
    13. Byrne, M.D. & Hossain, M.M., 2005. "Production planning: An improved hybrid approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 225-229, January.
    14. Richard E. Nance & Robert G. Sargent, 2002. "Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 161-172, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diaz, Juan Esteban & Handl, Julia & Xu, Dong-Ling, 2018. "Integrating meta-heuristics, simulation and exact techniques for production planning of a failure-prone manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 976-989.
    2. Romauch, Martin & Hartl, Richard F., 2017. "Capacity planning for cluster tools in the semiconductor industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 167-180.
    3. Manuel Chica & Joaquín Bautista & Jesica de Armas, 2019. "Benefits of robust multiobjective optimization for flexible automotive assembly line balancing," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 75-103, March.
    4. Dávid Gyulai & András Pfeiffer & László Monostori, 2017. "Robust production planning and control for multi-stage systems with flexible final assembly lines," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(13), pages 3657-3673, July.
    5. Thomas W. Lucas & W. David Kelton & Paul J. Sánchez & Susan M. Sanchez & Ben L. Anderson, 2015. "Changing the paradigm: Simulation, now a method of first resort," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 293-303, June.
    6. Bilge Bilgen & Yelda Çelebi, 2013. "Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning in dairy supply chain by hybrid modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 55-82, December.
    7. Shishvan, Masoud Soleymani & Benndorf, Jörg, 2019. "Simulation-based optimization approach for material dispatching in continuous mining systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1108-1125.
    8. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    9. Schmid, Verena & Doerner, Karl F. & Laporte, Gilbert, 2013. "Rich routing problems arising in supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 435-448.
    10. Giscard Valonne Mouafo Nebot & Haiyan Wang, 2022. "Port Terminal Performance Evaluation and Modeling," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Huang, Shiyang & Hu, Guiping & Chennault, Carrie & Su, Liu & Brandes, Elke & Heaton, Emily & Schulte, Lisa & Wang, Lizhi & Tyndall, John, 2016. "Agent-based modeling of bioenergy crop adoption and farmer decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1188-1201.
    12. Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng & William Benjamin Haskell, 2022. "A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 569-585, January.
    13. Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Russell, Robert & Xu, Xiaojing & Zepeda, David, 2009. "A simulation/metaheuristic approach to newspaper production and distribution supply chain problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 752-767, October.
    14. Mathias A. Klapp & Alan L. Erera & Alejandro Toriello, 2018. "The One-Dimensional Dynamic Dispatch Waves Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 402-415, March.
    15. Shi, Wen & Liu, Zhixue & Shang, Jennifer & Cui, Yujia, 2013. "Multi-criteria robust design of a JIT-based cross-docking distribution center for an auto parts supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 695-706.
    16. Gunpinar, Serkan & Centeno, Grisselle, 2016. "An integer programming approach to the bloodmobile routing problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 94-115.
    17. Vergidis, K. & Tiwari, A. & Majeed, B. & Roy, R., 2007. "Optimisation of business process designs: An algorithmic approach with multiple objectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 105-121, September.
    18. Emelogu, Adindu & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan & Eksioglu, Burak, 2016. "An enhanced sample average approximation method for stochastic optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 230-252.
    19. Anzhen Peng & Longcheng Liu & Weifeng Lin, 2021. "Improved approximation algorithms for two-stage flexible flow shop scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 28-42, January.
    20. Dellino, Gabriella & Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Meloni, Carlo, 2010. "Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 52-59, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:2:y:2015:i:c:p:62-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.