IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v201y2022icp68-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chimpanzee leader election optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Wibowo, Ferry Wahyu
  • Sediyono, Eko
  • Purnomo, Hindriyanto Dwi

Abstract

Solving the convergence problem in the world of computing is needed to find an optimization solution. Many researchers propose a meta-heuristic approach in solving problems quickly using the results of the approach. This method is used because of its flexibility and fast search rate. Each meta-heuristic method has its own characteristics and is not necessarily able to solve the problem for all cases. This paper proposes a meta-heuristic method that is inspired by the way in which leaders are chosen in the chimpanzee community. The leader in the chimpanzee community is always the alpha male chimpanzee and has relationships with all chimps, both male and female. The principle of Chimpanzee Leader Election Optimization (CLEO) is the phase of improving performance and social relations with community members. The chimp performance improvement phase is based on the age aspect, which affects the memorize’s ability of the chimps, which are inverted U-shaped. Meanwhile, the social relations/mating phase has been analogized in this CLEO algorithm. This paper has also evaluated the performance of the proposed algorithm, both to find the optimal value in the minimum and maximum search. This algorithm has also been compared with various other meta-heuristic algorithms. The results of the CLEO algorithm are quite competitive with other meta-heuristic algorithms in multi-high dimensional.

Suggested Citation

  • Wibowo, Ferry Wahyu & Sediyono, Eko & Purnomo, Hindriyanto Dwi, 2022. "Chimpanzee leader election optimization," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 68-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:201:y:2022:i:c:p:68-95
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2022.05.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475422001951
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2022.05.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf & Lynn E. Eberly & Anne E. Pusey, 2004. "Sex differences in learning in chimpanzees," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6984), pages 715-716, April.
    2. A. Whiten & J. Goodall & W. C. McGrew & T. Nishida & V. Reynolds & Y. Sugiyama & C. E. G. Tutin & R. W. Wrangham & C. Boesch, 1999. "Cultures in chimpanzees," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6737), pages 682-685, June.
    3. De Vincenzo, Ilario & Massari, Giovanni F. & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Carbone, Giuseppe & Grigolini, Paolo, 2018. "Mimicking the collective intelligence of human groups as an optimization tool for complex problems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 259-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sueur, Cédric & Fourneret, Eric & Espinosa, Romain, 2023. "Animal capital: a new way to define human-animal bond in view of global changes," OSF Preprints svg7x, Center for Open Science.
    2. James Winters, 2019. "Escaping optimization traps: the role of cultural adaptation and cultural exaptation in facilitating open-ended cumulative dynamics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Wasniewski, Krzysztof, 2020. "Energy efficiency as manifestation of collective intelligence in human societies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Rachel L Kendal & Jeremy R Kendal & Will Hoppitt & Kevin N Laland, 2009. "Identifying Social Learning in Animal Populations: A New ‘Option-Bias’ Method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-9, August.
    5. Hopkins, William D. & Li, Xiang & Roberts, Neil, 2019. "More intelligent chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have larger brains and increased cortical thickness," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 18-24.
    6. Namjun Cha & Junseok Hwang & Eungdo Kim, 2020. "The optimal knowledge creation strategy of organizations in groupthink situations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 207-235, June.
    7. Dominique Guillo & Nicolas Claidière, 2020. "Do guide dogs have culture? The case of indirect social learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Gifford, Adam, 2013. "Sociality, trust, kinship and cultural evolution," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 218-227.
    9. Elisa Bandini & Rachel A. Harrison & Alba Motes-Rodrigo, 2022. "Examining the suitability of extant primates as models of hominin stone tool culture," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Massari, Giovanni F. & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Carbone, Giuseppe, 2019. "Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 343-355.
    11. John Gerring & Paul A. Barresi, 2003. "Putting Ordinary Language to Work," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 15(2), pages 201-232, April.
    12. Ohtsuki, Hisashi & Wakano, Joe Yuichiro & Kobayashi, Yutaka, 2017. "Inclusive fitness analysis of cumulative cultural evolution in an island-structured population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 13-23.
    13. Rafał Olszowski & Marcin Chmielowski, 2020. "Collective Intelligence in Polish-Ukrainian Internet Projects. Debate Models and Research Methods," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Suren Basov, 2002. "Imitation And Social Learning," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 843, The University of Melbourne.
    15. Enquist, M. & Ghirlanda, S. & Jarrick, A. & Wachtmeister, C.-A., 2008. "Why does human culture increase exponentially?," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 46-55.
    16. Ferenc Molnár Jr & Thomas Caraco & Gyorgy Korniss, 2012. "Extraordinary Sex Ratios: Cultural Effects on Ecological Consequences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:201:y:2022:i:c:p:68-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.