IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v57y2015icp111-119.html

Quota swapping, relative stability, and transparency

Author

Listed:
  • Hoefnagel, Ellen
  • de Vos, Birgit
  • Buisman, Erik

Abstract

One of the oldest elements of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) is the principle of ‘relative stability’. Relative stability means that yearly established Total Allowable Catches (TACs) for each fish stock are divided between the Member States of the European Union (EU) according to a fixed allocation key. One way to circumvent the relative stability is the (increasing) practice of swapping quota with other Member States. These swaps have a temporary character, but continuously repeated yearly swaps occur. In recent decades many Member States have shifted resource management responsibilities more towards the industry and the process of quota swapping is in several Member States managed by Producers Organisations (POs) rather than by government administrations. Networks of fishermen and POs try to establish solid relationships and try to put at the same time stability and flexibility into the system. Information and networks play an important role in the process of quota swapping. However, not all POs and fishermen tend to have (equal) access to the required information for quota swapping which raises questions on how transparent this process is. With the upcoming implementation of the landing obligation, the quota swaps between Member States are expected to increase further. This paper describes the extent and the practice of quota swapping, the implications for one of the principles of good governance, transparency, as well as the effects of swapping for the relative stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoefnagel, Ellen & de Vos, Birgit & Buisman, Erik, 2015. "Quota swapping, relative stability, and transparency," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 111-119.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:111-119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X15000615
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aarti Gupta, 2008. "Transparency Under Scrutiny: Information Disclosure in Global Environmental Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 8(2), pages 1-7, May.
    2. Churchill, Robin & Owen, Daniel, 2010. "The EC Common Fisheries Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199275847.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carpenter, Griffin & Kleinjans, Richard & Villasante, Sebastian & O’Leary, Bethan C., 2016. "Landing the blame: The influence of EU Member States on quota setting," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 9-15.
    2. Simon Mardle & Sebastien Metz, 2017. "Impacts of current EU regulation on the UK whitefish value chain," Post-Print hal-04294401, HAL.
    3. Carmona, Itsaso & Ansuategi, Alberto & Chamorro, José Manuel & Escapa, Marta & Gallastegui, María Carmen & Murillas, Arantza & Prellezo, Raúl, 2020. "Measuring the value of ecosystem-based fishery management using financial portfolio theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. María-José Gutiérrez & Belén Inguanzo, 2019. "Contributing to Fisheries Sustainability: Inequality Analysis in the High Seas Catches of Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Nielsen, Rasmus & Hoff, Ayoe & Waldo, Staffan & Hammarlund, Cecilia & Virtanen, Jarno, 2019. "Fishing for nutrients – economic effects of fisheries management targeting eutrophication in the Baltic Sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 156-167.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasyim, Zainuri & Laraswati, Dwi & Purwanto, Ris H. & Pratama, Andita A. & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2020. "Challenges facing independent monitoring networks in the Indonesian timber legality assurance system," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Pistorius, Till & Reinecke, Sabine, 2013. "The interim REDD+ Partnership: Boost for biodiversity safeguards?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 80-86.
    3. Jason Thistlethwaite & Matthew Paterson, 2016. "Private governance and accounting for sustainability networks," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1197-1221, November.
    4. Hancic Maja Turnšek, 2013. "No Synonyms: Global Governance and the Transnational Public," Croatian International Relations Review, Paradigm, vol. 19(69), pages 5-31, December.
    5. Sherrie Steiner, 2011. "Religious Soft Power as Accountability Mechanism for Power in World Politics," SAGE Open, , vol. 1(3), pages 21582440114, October.
    6. Biermann, Frank & Gupta, Aarti, 2011. "Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1856-1864, September.
    7. Frank Biermann & Michele Betsill & Joyeeta Gupta & Norichika Kanie & Louis Lebel & Diana Liverman & Heike Schroeder & Bernd Siebenhüner & Ruben Zondervan, 2010. "Earth system governance: a research framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 277-298, December.
    8. Thomas Gehring & Sebastian Oberthür & Marc Mühleck, 2013. "European Union Actorness in International Institutions: Why the EU is Recognized as an Actor in Some International Institutions, but Not in Others," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 849-865, September.
    9. Mitchell, Ronald B., 2011. "Transparency for governance: The mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1882-1890, September.
    10. Smělá Monika & Sejkora Jiří, 2022. "Natural Resource Revenue Management: Which Institutional Factors Matter?," Review of Economic Perspectives, Paradigm, vol. 22(1), pages 3-23, March.
    11. Esther Turnhout & Katja Neves & Elisa de Lijster, 2014. "‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 581-597, March.
    12. Deanna Kemp & John R. Owen & Éléonore Lèbre, 2021. "Tailings facility failures in the global mining industry: Will a ‘transparency turn’ drive change?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 122-134, January.
    13. Eungkyoon Lee, 2010. "Information disclosure and environmental regulation: Green lights and gray areas," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 303-328, September.
    14. Doris Fuchs & Agni Kalfagianni & Jennifer Clapp & Lawrence Busch, 2011. "Introduction to symposium on private agrifood governance: values, shortcomings and strategies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(3), pages 335-344, September.
    15. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Walter, Götz & Van de Graaf, Thijs & Andrews, Nathan, 2016. "Energy Governance, Transnational Rules, and the Resource Curse: Exploring the Effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 179-192.
    16. Ingo Take, 2012. "Regulating the Internet infrastructure: A comparative appraisal of the legitimacy of ICANN, ITU, and the WSIS," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 499-523, December.
    17. Mary R. Brooks & Geraldine Knatz & Athanasios A. Pallis & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2022. "Transparency in port governance: setting a research agenda," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Sherrie Steiner, 2013. "Reflexivity in External Religious Leaders’ Summit Communication Sequences (2005-2012) to G8 Political Leaders," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, December.
    19. Carole Excell & ELIZABETH Moses, 2017. "Thirsting for Justice: Transparency and Poor People’s Struggle for Clean Water in Indonesia, Mongolia, and Thailand," Working Papers id:12066, eSocialSciences.
    20. Miron Avidan & Dror Etzion & Joel Gehman, 2019. "Opaque transparency: How material affordances shape intermediary work," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 197-219, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:111-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.