IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v169y2026ics026483772600219x.html

BGBI: A citywide-referenced and bidirectional land use mix index for planning and policy evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Pedreira Junior, Jorge Ubirajara
  • Louro, Thiago Vinícius
  • Assis, Lucas Brandão Monteiro de
  • Brito, Patrícia Lustosa
  • Bomfim, Fabio Garboggini

Abstract

Land use mix (LUM) metrics provide actionable evidence to monitor planning goals and prioritize interventions, including transit-oriented development, zoning revisions, and urban retrofits. Yet common measures suffer from two main limitations that often render them difficult to translate into decisions. First, all measures summarize how mixed a place is without indicating the direction of the mix, i.e. whether a homogeneous area is predominantly residential or non-residential. Second, most metrics attain their maximum LUM value at a 50/50 split, even when the citywide composition is highly asymmetric. Here we introduce the Bidirectional Global-centered Balance Index (BGBI), a bounded signed index for land use composition that preserves directionality and centers interpretation on the observed citywide reference share. We compute BGBI alongside four widely used benchmarks and empirically validate all indices against job accessibility metrics by testing whether each measure’s implied balance target coincides with accessibility optima. The analysis uses point address data to measure LUM in terms of residential and non-residential shares aggregated in H3 hexagonal grids for three Brazilian cities. The full workflow can be executed using an open-source R package, which supports reproducible computation of all indices across multiple H3 resolutions and facilitates straightforward replication and sensitivity checks. Our results indicate that the highest-accessibility locations occur near baseline-centered balance (BGBI ≅ 0), rather than near the 50/50 reference implicit in many conventional metrics. These results show that interpretability properties can change diagnostic conclusions and suggest that baseline-centered directionality provides a practical target for planning and policy monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedreira Junior, Jorge Ubirajara & Louro, Thiago Vinícius & Assis, Lucas Brandão Monteiro de & Brito, Patrícia Lustosa & Bomfim, Fabio Garboggini, 2026. "BGBI: A citywide-referenced and bidirectional land use mix index for planning and policy evaluation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600219x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772600219X
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    2. Kevin Manaugh & Tyler Kreider, 2013. "What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(1), pages 63-72.
    3. Sarika Bahadure & Rajashree Kotharkar, 2015. "Assessing Sustainability of Mixed Use Neighbourhoods through Residents’ Travel Behaviour and Perception: The Case of Nagpur, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Ha Na Im & Chang Gyu Choi, 2019. "The hidden side of the entropy-based land-use mix index: Clarifying the relationship between pedestrian volume and land-use mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1865-1881, July.
    5. Jiacheng Jiao & John Rollo & Baibai Fu, 2021. "The Hidden Characteristics of Land-Use Mix Indices: An Overview and Validity Analysis Based on the Land Use in Melbourne, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Nandini Iyer & Ronaldo Menezes & Hugo Barbosa, 2024. "Mobility and transit segregation in urban spaces," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1496-1512, September.
    7. Qixuan Li & Xingli Chen & Sheng Jiao & Wenmei Song & Wenke Zong & Yanhe Niu, 2022. "Can Mixed Land Use Reduce CO 2 Emissions? A Case Study of 268 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Hongji Chen & Kangchuan Su & Lixian Peng & Guohua Bi & Lulu Zhou & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Mixed Land Use Levels in Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Pingba Village in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Raman, Rewati & Roy, Uttam Kumar, 2019. "Taxonomy of urban mixed land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunes Almansoub & Ming Zhong & Asif Raza & Muhammad Safdar & Abdelghani Dahou & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Transportation Supply on Mixed Land-Use at the Parcel Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Alessia Iannillo & Isidoro Fasolino, 2021. "Land-Use Mix and Urban Sustainability: Benefits and Indicators Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Hongji Chen & Kangchuan Su & Lixian Peng & Guohua Bi & Lulu Zhou & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Mixed Land Use Levels in Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Pingba Village in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Lijing Dong & Lingyu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Coupling Coordination Evaluation of Mixed Land Use and Urban Vitality in Major Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Hongyu Zheng & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Jianhong Huang & Qi Fu, 2021. "Measuring and characterizing land use mix patterns of China’s megacities: A case study of Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2509-2539, December.
    6. Qu, Boting & Li, Fen & Gao, Yuan, 2026. "Decoding built environment impacts and regional interdependence of urban traffic emissions using interpretable deep learning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    7. Nimra Iqbal & Marvin Ravan & Ali Jamshed & Joern Birkmann & Giorgos Somarakis & Zina Mitraka & Nektarios Chrysoulakis, 2022. "Linkages between Typologies of Existing Urban Development Patterns and Human Vulnerability to Heat Stress in Lahore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Motieyan, Hamid & Azmoodeh, Mohammad, 2021. "Mixed-use distribution index: A novel bilevel measure to address urban land-use mix pattern (A case study in Tehran, Iran)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Yunes Almansoub & Ming Zhong & Muhammad Safdar & Asif Raza & Abdelghani Dahou & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness, 2023. "Modeling Impact of Transportation Infrastructure-Based Accessibility on the Development of Mixed Land Use Using Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Jiang’an District, City of Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-40, October.
    10. Byunghak Min & Gunwon Lee & Seiyong Kim, 2021. "Effects of Land-Use Characteristics on Transport Mode Choices by Purpose of Travel in Seoul, South Korea, Based on Spatial Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Fahad Ahmed Shaikh & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Saima Kalwar, 2022. "Factors Influencing Residential Location Choice towards Mixed Land-Use Development: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    12. Hanbing Yang & Meichen Fu & Li Wang & Feng Tang, 2021. "Mixed Land Use Evaluation and Its Impact on Housing Prices in Beijing Based on Multi-Source Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Bridgelall, Raj & Stubbing, Edward, 2021. "Forecasting the effects of autonomous vehicles on land use," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen M Gibler, 2022. "The effect of film production studios on housing prices in Atlanta, the Hollywood of the South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 771-788, March.
    15. Liu, Jixiang & Xiao, Longzhu, 2023. "Non-linear relationships between built environment and commuting duration of migrants and locals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Paköz, Muhammed Ziya & Yaratgan, Dilara & Şahin, Aydan, 2022. "Re-mapping urban vitality through Jane Jacobs’ criteria: The case of Kayseri, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Xingjian Liu & Ying Long, 2016. "Automated identification and characterization of parcels with OpenStreetMap and points of interest," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 341-360, March.
    18. Letizia Appolloni & Alberto Giretti & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2020. "Walkable Urban Environments: An Ergonomic Approach of Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    19. Eun Yeong Seong & Youngjae Lim & Chang Gyu Choi, 2022. "Why are convenience stores clustered? The reasons behind the clustering of similar shops and the effect of increased competition," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 834-846, March.
    20. Grace Abou Jaoude & Majd Murad & Olaf Mumm & Vanessa Miriam Carlow, 2024. "Operationalizing the open city concept: A case study of Berlin," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 721-744, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600219x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.