IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v120y2022ics0264837722003179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land redevelopment under ambiguous property rights in transitional Vietnam: A case of spatial transformation in Hanoi city center

Author

Listed:
  • Le, Minh Khue
  • Zhu, Jieming
  • Nguyen, Hoang Linh

Abstract

Since the economic reform in 1986, there have been important changes in the institutions for land-use in Vietnam, which set the foundation for the transition from “land as a means of production” to “land as an assest”. Along with the gradual transition of land-use rights, a dual land market prevails as a result of the coexistence between marketization and centralization. In that system, the gap of land prices between market and non-market tracks has created landed interests that are embedded intricately within the resultant built environment, coupled with the rent-seeking behavior of SOE land holders and developers. Through the empirical case studies of the land redevelopment projects led by the state-owned enterprises in Hanoi’s city center, the study shows the hidden logic of spatial transformation and conflicts between the planning control under state’s ideology and land-rent seeking behavior in the reality. From the perspective of land rights, it is observed that state assets going through spontaneously “informal privatization” under ambiguous property rights has caused hasty redevelopment, leading to the development control mechanism not working properly. As a result, the externalities of un-controlled development are not internalized, causing over-compaction in the city’s center and lowers the environmental quality. This paper suggests that clarification of property rights should be the goal for further institutional change and of strengthening the state's capacity in development control.

Suggested Citation

  • Le, Minh Khue & Zhu, Jieming & Nguyen, Hoang Linh, 2022. "Land redevelopment under ambiguous property rights in transitional Vietnam: A case of spatial transformation in Hanoi city center," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722003179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2018. "A New Institutional Economics approach to Law and Development," Chapters, in: Law and Development, chapter 4, pages 66-90, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Cai, Meina & Murtazashvili, Ilia & Murtazashvili, Jennifer, 2020. "The politics of land property rights," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 151-167, April.
    3. Barrie Needham & Erik Louw, 2006. "Institutional Economics and Policies for Changing Land Markets: The Case of Industrial Estates in the Netherlands," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 75-90, March.
    4. ., 2018. "New Institutional Economics," Chapters, in: Law and Development, chapter 2, pages 15-44, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Thanh Bao Nguyen & Erwin Van de Krabben & D. Ary A. Samsura, 2017. "A curious case of property privatization: two examples of the tragedy of the anticommons in Ho Chi Minh City-Vietnam," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 72-90, January.
    6. Hoang Linh Nguyen & Jin Duan & Jin Hua Liu, 2018. "State Control Versus Hybrid Land Markets: Planning and Urban Development in Transitional Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Jieming Zhu, 2002. "Urban Development under Ambiguous Property Rights: A Case of China’s Transition Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 41-57, March.
    8. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Yuan, Feng, 2017. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 604-613.
    9. Pham van Thuyet, 1995. "The emerging legal framework for private sector development in Viet Nam's transitional economy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1486, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Lin, Wanlin & Lin, George C.S., 2023. "Strategizing actors and agents in the functioning of informal property Rights: The tragicomedy of the extralegal housing market in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Tang, Peng & Shi, Xiaoping & Gao, Jinlong & Feng, Shuyi & Qu, Futian, 2019. "Demystifying the key for intoxicating land finance in China: An empirical study through the lens of government expenditure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 302-309.
    5. Meina Cai & Jianyong Fan & Chunhui Ye & Qi Zhang, 2021. "Government debt, land financing and distributive justice in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2329-2347, August.
    6. ., 2014. "Planning and economic performance," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 5, pages 104-126, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Cao, Kexin & Deng, Yu & Wang, Wenxue & Liu, Shenghe, 2023. "The spatial heterogeneity and dynamics of land redevelopment: Evidence from 287 Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Sumei Zhang & Kenneth Pearlman, 2009. "Legislative Support for Urban Land-Use Control in China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(3), pages 399-412, June.
    9. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    10. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, 2023. "The universal commons: An economic theory of ecosystem ownership," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    11. Fox ZY Hu, 2015. "Industrial capitalisation and spatial transformation in Chinese cities: Strategic repositioning, state-owned enterprise capitalisation, and the reproduction of urban space in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2799-2821, November.
    12. George C S Lin & Y H Dennis Wei, 2002. "China's Restless Urban Landscapes 1: New Challenges for Theoretical Reconstruction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(9), pages 1535-1544, September.
    13. Rahmat Aris Pratomo & D. Ary A. Samsura & Erwin van der Krabben, 2020. "Transformation of Local People’s Property Rights Induced by New Town Development (Case Studies in Peri-Urban Areas in Indonesia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Fang He & Wendong Wu & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2019. "Exploring the Diverse Expectations of Stakeholders in Industrial Land Redevelopment Projects in China: The Case of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Peter J. Boettke & Rosolino A. Candela, 2021. "János Kornai, the Austrians, and the political and economic analysis of socialism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 85-97, April.
    16. Jinlong Gao & Zhixuan Wu & Jianglong Chen & Wen Chen, 2020. "Beyond the bid‐rent: Two tales of land use transition in contemporary China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1336-1356, September.
    17. Or Levkovich & Jan Rouwendal, 2016. "Spatial Planning and Segmentation of the Land Market," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-018/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    18. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: II. A case study of the redevelopment of a local state-owned enterprise in Nanjing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 372-380.
    19. Zeng, Zhaozhao & Song, Bingjie & Zheng, Xiaodong & Li, Huan, 2019. "Changes of traffic network and urban transformation: A case study of Xi’an city, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Kim, Annette M., 2007. "North versus South: The Impact of Social Norms in the Market Pricing of Private Property Rights in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2079-2095, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.