IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v96y2025ics0957178725001055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market share, plant ownership, and the merit-order effect of renewable resources: Evidence from Australia’s National Electricity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Levitt, Clinton J.
  • Lovell, Skylar

Abstract

The increasing reliance on wind and solar generation motivates the need to continue investigating their impact on electricity markets. Complications continue to arise because of the ongoing concern about the potential of dominant firms to exert significant market power in electricity markets. This paper aims to empirically investigate whether market power has a mitigating effect on the merit-order effect (MOE) of solar and wind generation and to determine whether changes to pricing policies worked to alleviate any of the mitigating effects. We analyse the New South Wales (NSW) wholesale electricity by analysing market outcomes for each five-minute dispatch auction from 2019 to 2022. Our main conclusion is that there is no substantial empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the market power of the dominant firm mitigated the MOE of wind generation over the sample period. The only significant evidence of a mitigating effect was in dispatch intervals in which the dominant firm was a pivotal supplier. Our analysis provides evidence that the dominant firm internalised the potential loss in revenue from coal generation due to the MOE from its wind generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Levitt, Clinton J. & Lovell, Skylar, 2025. "Market share, plant ownership, and the merit-order effect of renewable resources: Evidence from Australia’s National Electricity Market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001055
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001055
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.