IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v75y2022ics0957178722000133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iran's day-ahead electricity market: Structural assessment and solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Karimi, Ali
  • Tarashandeh, Nader
  • Kouchakzadeh, Amirmasoud
  • Kouchakmohseni, Farshad
  • Naghiloo, Mitra

Abstract

Iranian day-ahead market (IDAM) launched in 2003. However, after several years from launching, there are still significant challenges in this market, such as the high number of power units' status changes (starts/stops) in the day-ahead program output. This article analyzes the current state of the IDAM by two essential studies to reduce the drawbacks of this market. First, comparative studies are performed between the current situation of the IDAM and some major markets around the world. Second, we investigate the roots of the drawbacks of IDAM by analyzing actual data. Then, some structural solutions for reducing the drawbacks are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Karimi, Ali & Tarashandeh, Nader & Kouchakzadeh, Amirmasoud & Kouchakmohseni, Farshad & Naghiloo, Mitra, 2022. "Iran's day-ahead electricity market: Structural assessment and solutions," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0957178722000133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2022.101347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178722000133
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Álvaro Riascos, Miguel Bernal, Luciano de Castro and Shmuel Oren, 2016. "Transition to Centralized Unit Commitment An Econometric Analysis of Colombia's Experience," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    2. Marshall, Luke & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2021. "Assessing wholesale competition in the Australian National Electricity Market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Yousefi, G.Reza & Kaviri, Sajjad Makhdoomi & Latify, Mohammad Amin & Rahmati, Iman, 2017. "Electricity industry restructuring in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 212-226.
    4. Sioshansi, Ramteen & Oren, Shmuel & O'Neill, Richard, 2010. "Three-part auctions versus self-commitment in day-ahead electricity markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 165-173, December.
    5. Letova, Ksenia & Yao, Rui & Davidson, Mikhail & Afanasyeva, Ekaterina, 2018. "A review of electricity markets and reforms in Russia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 84-93.
    6. Peter Cramton, 2017. "Electricity market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 589-612.
    7. Pär Holmberg and Ewa Lazarczyk, 2015. "Comparison of congestion management techniques: Nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    8. Camelo, Sergio & Papavasiliou, Anthony & de Castro, Luciano & Riascos, Álvaro & Oren, Shmuel, 2018. "A structural model to evaluate the transition from self-commitment to centralized unit commitment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 560-572.
    9. Frank A. Wolak, 2003. "Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market, 1998–2000," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 425-430, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pizarro-Irizar, Cristina, 2023. "Is it all about supply? Demand-side effects on the Spanish electricity market following Covid-19 lockdown policies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suarez, Carlos, 2022. "Private management and strategic bidding behavior in electricity markets: Evidence from Colombia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Simona Bigerna & Carlo Andrea Bollino & Maria Chiara D’Errico & Paolo Polinori, 2023. "A new design for market power monitoring in the electricity market. A simulation for Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(1), pages 285-317, April.
    3. Gallego, Camilo A., 2022. "Intertemporal effects of imperfect competition through forward contracts in wholesale electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. John J. García Rendón & Alex F. Pérez-Libreros, 2019. "El precio spot de la electricidad y la inclusión de energía renovable no convencional: evidencia para Colombia," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 17393, Universidad EAFIT.
    5. Perez, Alex & Garcia-Rendon, John J., 2021. "Integration of non-conventional renewable energy and spot price of electricity: A counterfactual analysis for Colombia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 146-161.
    6. Camelo, Sergio & Papavasiliou, Anthony & de Castro, Luciano & Riascos, Álvaro & Oren, Shmuel, 2018. "A structural model to evaluate the transition from self-commitment to centralized unit commitment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 560-572.
    7. Richstein, Jörn C. & Lorenz, Casimir & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2020. "An auction story: How simple bids struggle with uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. David Rios & Alex Perez & Jaime Carabali & Luis Meneses, 2024. "Poder de mercado y eventos climáticos adversos en un mercado de electricidad hidro-dominado," Borradores de Economia 1266, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    9. Eicke, Anselm & Schittekatte, Tim, 2022. "Fighting the wrong battle? A critical assessment of arguments against nodal electricity prices in the European debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Munhoz, Fernando Colli, 2021. "Two-settlement system for the Brazilian electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Holmberg, Pär & Tangerås, Thomas & Ahlqvist, Victor, 2018. "Central- versus Self-Dispatch in Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 1257, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 27 Mar 2019.
    12. Jun Dong & Dongran Liu & Xihao Dou & Bo Li & Shiyao Lv & Yuzheng Jiang & Tongtao Ma, 2021. "Key Issues and Technical Applications in the Study of Power Markets as the System Adapts to the New Power System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Höckner, Jonas & Voswinkel, Simon & Weber, Christoph, 2020. "Market distortions in flexibility markets caused by renewable subsidies – The case for side payments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Katzen, Matthew & Leslie, Gordon W., 2024. "Siting and operating incentives in electrical networks: A study of mispricing in zonal markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Zhao, Xiaoli & Sun, Chuyu & Zhong, Zewei & Liu, Suwei & Yang, Zili, 2023. "Effect of market structure on renewable energy Development—A simulation study of a regional electricity market in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Jonas Höckner & Simon Voswinkel & Christoph Weber, "undated". "Market distortions in flexibility markets caused by renewable subsidies – The case for side payments," EWL Working Papers 1905, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics.
    17. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    19. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0957178722000133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.