IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v66y2020ics095717872030076x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aligning stakeholder interests: How ‘appropriate’ technologies have become the accepted water infrastructure solutions for low-income areas

Author

Listed:
  • Boakye-Ansah, Akosua Sarpong
  • Schwartz, Klaas
  • Zwarteveen, Margreet

Abstract

Service differentiation and the use of "appropriate technologies" are often presented as alternative approaches to providing water service to low-income areas. Service differentiation allows water service providers to manage the risks associated with service expansion to these areas. We argue that rather than a choice of the service provider alone, the decision for service differentiation should be seen as a consensus between different actors in the water services sector. A review of secondary data, and semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders in three Kenyan cities, show that managers of water utilities also choose these strategies because they appeal to and align with the interest of donors, governments, sector organisations, and alternative providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Boakye-Ansah, Akosua Sarpong & Schwartz, Klaas & Zwarteveen, Margreet, 2020. "Aligning stakeholder interests: How ‘appropriate’ technologies have become the accepted water infrastructure solutions for low-income areas," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:66:y:2020:i:c:s095717872030076x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2020.101081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872030076X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilder, Margaret & Romero Lankao, Patricia, 2006. "Paradoxes of Decentralization: Water Reform and Social Implications in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1977-1995, November.
    2. Akosua Sarpong Boakye-Ansah & Klaas Schwartz & Margreet Zwarteveen, 2019. "From Rowdy Cartels to Organized Ones? The Transfer of Power in Urban Water Supply in Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1246-1262, December.
    3. Abubakar, Ismaila Rimi, 2019. "Factors influencing household access to drinking water in Nigeria," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 40-51.
    4. Schwartz, Klaas & Tutusaus, Mireia & Savelli, Elisa, 2017. "Water for the urban poor: Balancing financial and social objectives through service differentiation in the Kenyan water sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 22-31.
    5. Jarmo J Hukka & Tapio S Katko, 2003. "Refuting the paradigm of water services privatisation," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 27(2), pages 142-155, May.
    6. Matthew Goff & Ben Crow, 2014. "What is water equity? The unfortunate consequences of a global focus on 'drinking water'," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 159-171, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwartz, Klaas & Boakye-Ansah, Akosua, 2023. "Pragmatism as an approach for decision-making: Why two Kenyan water utilities opted for pre-paid water dispensers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Nilsson, David & Blomkvist, Pär, 2021. "Is the self-read water meter a pro-poor innovation? Evidence from a low-income settlement in Nairobi," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Yuan, Mei-Hua & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2020. "Developing indicators for the monitoring of the sustainability of food, energy, and water," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Behera, Bhagirath & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Sethi, Narayan, 2020. "Analysis of household access to drinking water, sanitation, and waste disposal services in urban areas of Nepal," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Zachary P. Sugg, 2018. "An Equity Autopsy: Exploring the Role of Water Rights in Water Allocations and Impacts for the Central Valley Project during the 2012–2016 California Drought," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Smith, Heidi Jane M. & Revell, Keith D., 2016. "Micro-Incentives and Municipal Behavior: Political Decentralization and Fiscal Federalism in Argentina and Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 231-248.
    7. Raphaëlle Ducrot & Magalie Bourblanc, 2017. "Promoting equity in water access: the limits of fairness of a rural water programme in semi‐arid Mozambique," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 131-144, August.
    8. Arasteh, Mohammad Ali & Farjami, Yaghoub, 2021. "Supporting Sustainable Rural Groundwater Demand Management with Fuzzy Decision Analysis: A Case Study in Iran," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Sosson Tadadjeu & Brice Kamguia & Ronald Djeunankan, 2023. "Access to drinking water and sanitation in developing countries: Does financial development matter?," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 457-481, July.
    10. Hug March & David Saurí, 2013. "The Unintended Consequences of Ecological Modernization: Debt-Induced Reconfiguration of the Water Cycle in Barcelona," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(9), pages 2064-2083, September.
    11. Souleymane DIALLO, 2023. "Access to modern energy and poverty in regions of Burkina Faso: Evidence from a panel data analysis," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 58, pages 51-63.
    12. Subham Mukherjee & Wiebke Bebermeier & Brigitta Schütt, 2018. "An Overview of the Impacts of Land Use Land Cover Changes (1980–2014) on Urban Water Security of Kolkata," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Estache, Antonio & Garsous, Grégoire & Seroa da Motta, Ronaldo, 2016. "Shared Mandates, Moral Hazard, and Political (Mis)alignment in a Decentralized Economy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 98-110.
    14. Karina Vink, 2014. "Transboundary water law and vulnerable people: legal interpretations of the 'equitable use' principle," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 743-754, September.
    15. Abdul Jalil, Ahmad Zafarullah, 2009. "Decentralization, Subnational Governments' Behaviour and Macroeconomic Instability: The Case of Malaysia," MPRA Paper 19071, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Frank Charles Dhin Etia & Gregory Mvogo & Bidiasse Honoré, 2022. "Les déterminants d'accès à l'eau potable au Cameroun," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(1), pages 154-170, March.
    17. Herrera, Veronica & Post, Alison E., 2014. "Can Developing Countries Both Decentralize and Depoliticize Urban Water Services? Evaluating the Legacy of the 1990s Reform Wave," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 621-641.
    18. Asquer, Alberto, 2011. "Liberalization and regulatory reform of network industries: A comparative analysis of Italian public utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 172-184.
    19. Gimelli, Francesco M. & Bos, Joannette J. & Rogers, Briony C., 2018. "Fostering equity and wellbeing through water: A reinterpretation of the goal of securing access," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-9.
    20. Gazzeh, Karim & Abubakar, Ismaila Rimi, 2018. "Regional disparity in access to basic public services in Saudi Arabia: A sustainability challenge," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 70-80.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:66:y:2020:i:c:s095717872030076x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.