IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v92y2024ics0301420724002861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the relationship among public strategies and natural resource efficiency for green economic recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Dehong
  • Zhao, Lihua

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of public strategies on natural resource efficiency to promote a green economic recovery, focusing on thirty provinces in China from 1990 to 2020. By utilizing a panel model approach, it aims to uncover how governmental policies can enhance the sustainable use of natural resources, essential for economic sustainability. The research finds a significant correlation between effective public strategies and improved natural resource efficiency, indicating that targeted policy interventions can lead to notable advancements in environmental sustainability and economic resilience. The results underscore the importance of well-designed, region-specific public policies in driving the transition towards a greener economy. For policymakers, the study highlights the necessity of integrating economic recovery efforts with environmental protection strategies to achieve sustainable development, offering valuable insights for fostering eco-friendly economic growth in the face of global environmental challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Dehong & Zhao, Lihua, 2024. "Exploring the relationship among public strategies and natural resource efficiency for green economic recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724002861
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724002861
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724002861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.