IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v62y2019icp625-634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic analysis of iron flows and in-use stocks in China: 1949–2015

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Qiangfeng
  • Gao, Tianming
  • Wang, Gaoshang
  • Cheng, Jinhua
  • Dai, Tao
  • Wang, Huan

Abstract

Iron is an indispensable basic resource in national construction, and secondary iron resources are key to solving China's resource and environmental problems in the future. This study uses substance flow analysis (SFA) to calculate the iron stock since China's founding to provide data support for the recycling of secondary iron resources. The results indicate:as of the end of 2015, China's accumulated iron in-use stock was 6506 million tonnes (Mt); accumulated imported iron ore was 5092 Mt; accumulated domestic iron ore was 5933 Mt; accumulated domestic iron-ore-dressing loss was 1780 Mt; accumulated iron-smelting loss was 832 Mt; accumulated steel-smelting loss was 252 Mt; accumulated iron inventory for rolled steel was 78 Mt; and cumulative iron dissipation for end-use rolled steel was 479 Mt. Of all the accumulated iron in-use stock, the cumulative iron in-use stock in construction steel was 55%, followed by 19% in machinery manufacturing steel, 12% in transportation equipment steel, and 14% in other steel. At the end of 2015, the accumulated per capita iron in-use stock in China reached 4.73 t but is not near the 8–12 t level in developed countries. Compared with developed countries, China's per capita accumulated iron in-use stock has room for growth. The theoretical scraps of rolled steel on four consumption fields was increasing during the whole period. At the end of 2015, China's accumulated theoretical scrap volume was 1335 Mt.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Qiangfeng & Gao, Tianming & Wang, Gaoshang & Cheng, Jinhua & Dai, Tao & Wang, Huan, 2019. "Dynamic analysis of iron flows and in-use stocks in China: 1949–2015," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 625-634.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:62:y:2019:i:c:p:625-634
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.11.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420718303155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.11.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Wei-Qiang & Graedel, T.E., 2012. "Dynamic analysis of aluminum stocks and flows in the United States: 1900–2009," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 92-102.
    2. Alexis Cain & Sarah Disch & Cliff Twaroski & John Reindl & C. Randy Case, 2007. "Substance Flow Analysis of Mercury Intentionally Used in Products in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(3), pages 61-75, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Honghua & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng, 2023. "Tracing China's steel use from steel flows in the production system to steel footprints in the consumption system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Yue, Qiang & Chai, Xicui & Zhao, Feng & He, Junhao & Li, Yun & Wang, Heming, 2023. "Analysis of iron in-use stocks: Evidence from the provincial and municipal levels in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Li, Xin & Lin, Jing & Zhang, Di & Xiong, Zehui & He, Xiaoqiong & Yuan, Miao & Wang, Minxi, 2020. "Material flow analysis of titanium dioxide and sustainable policy suggestion in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Xi & Wu, Yufeng & Qu, Shen & Liang, Sai & Xu, Ming & Zuo, Tieyong, 2016. "The disposal and willingness to pay for residents scrap fluorescent lamps in China: A case study of Beijing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 103-111.
    2. Liang, Xuedong & Yang, Xu & Yan, Fuhai & Li, Zhi, 2020. "Exploring global embodied metal flows in international trade based combination of multi-regional input-output analysis and complex network analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Sverdrup, Harald U. & Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala & Koca, Deniz, 2015. "Aluminium for the future: Modelling the global production, market supply, demand, price and long term development of the global reserves," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 139-154.
    4. Ciacci, Luca & Chen, Weiqiang & Passarini, Fabrizio & Eckelman, Matthew & Vassura, Ivano & Morselli, Luciano, 2013. "Historical evolution of anthropogenic aluminum stocks and flows in Italy," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Li, Yun & Yue, Qiang & He, Junhao & Zhao, Feng & Wang, Heming, 2020. "When will the arrival of China's secondary aluminum era?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Renaud, Karine M. & Manley, Ross & Nassar, Nedal T., 2023. "A comparison of copper use in China and India as a proxy for their economic development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Guo, Xueyi & Zhang, Jingxi & Tian, Qinghua, 2021. "Modeling the potential impact of future lithium recycling on lithium demand in China: A dynamic SFA approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Wei‐Qiang Chen, 2018. "Dynamic Product‐Level Analysis of In‐Use Aluminum Stocks in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1425-1435, December.
    9. Buchner, Hanno & Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut & Fellner, Johann, 2017. "Potential recycling constraints due to future supply and demand of wrought and cast Al scrap—A closed system perspective on Austria," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 135-142.
    10. Cao, Zhi & Shen, Lei & Liu, Litao & Zhao, Jianan & Zhong, Shuai & Kong, Hanxiao & Sun, Yanzhi, 2017. "Estimating the in-use cement stock in China: 1920–2013," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 21-31.
    11. Wang, Minxi & Chen, Wu & Zhou, Yang & Li, Xin, 2017. "Assessment of potential copper scrap in China and policy recommendation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 235-244.
    12. Bertram, M. & Ramkumar, S. & Rechberger, H. & Rombach, G. & Bayliss, C. & Martchek, K.J. & Müller, D.B. & Liu, G., 2017. "A regionally-linked, dynamic material flow modelling tool for rolled, extruded and cast aluminium products," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 48-69.
    13. Jan Streeck & Quirin Dammerer & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Fridolin Krausmann, 2021. "The role of socio‐economic material stocks for natural resource use in the United States of America from 1870 to 2100," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1486-1502, December.
    14. Yue, Qiang & Wang, Heming & Gao, Chengkang & Du, Tao & Li, Mingjun & Lu, Zhongwu, 2016. "Analysis of iron in-use stocks in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 315-322.
    15. Zhou, Na & Su, Hui & Wu, Qiaosheng & Hu, Shougeng & Xu, Deyi & Yang, Danhui & Cheng, Jinhua, 2022. "China's lithium supply chain: Security dynamics and policy countermeasures," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Lu, Bin & Liu, Jingru & Yang, Jianxin, 2017. "Substance flow analysis of lithium for sustainable management in mainland China: 2007–2014," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 109-116.
    17. Chen, Wu & Wang, Minxi & Li, Xin, 2016. "Analysis of copper flows in the United States: 1975–2012," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 67-76.
    18. Chen, Qianqian & Gu, Yu & Tang, Zhiyong & Wei, Wei & Sun, Yuhan, 2018. "Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 192-207.
    19. Zhongguo Li & Puqi Jia & Fu Zhao & Yikun Kang, 2018. "Mercury Pollution, Treatment and Solutions in Spent Fluorescent Lamps in Mainland China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Shigetomi, Yosuke & Nansai, Keisuke & Kagawa, Shigemi & Tohno, Susumu, 2015. "Trends in Japanese households' critical-metals material footprints," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 118-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:62:y:2019:i:c:p:625-634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.