IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v40y2012i6p791-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single machine scheduling with general positional deterioration and rate-modifying maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Rustogi, Kabir
  • Strusevich, Vitaly A.

Abstract

We present polynomial-time algorithms for single machine problems with generalized positional deterioration effects and machine maintenance. The decisions should be taken regarding possible sequences of jobs and on the number of maintenance activities to be included into a schedule in order to minimize the overall makespan. We deal with general non-decreasing functions to represent deterioration rates of job processing times. Another novel extension of existing models is our assumption that a maintenance activity does not necessarily fully restore the machine to its original perfect state. In the resulting schedules, the jobs are split into groups, a particular group to be sequenced after a particular maintenance period, and the actual processing time of a job is affected by the group that job is placed into and its position within the group.

Suggested Citation

  • Rustogi, Kabir & Strusevich, Vitaly A., 2012. "Single machine scheduling with general positional deterioration and rate-modifying maintenance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 791-804.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:40:y:2012:i:6:p:791-804 DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2011.12.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048311001794
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mosheiov, Gur & Sidney, Jeffrey B., 2003. "Scheduling with general job-dependent learning curves," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 665-670, June.
    2. Biskup, Dirk, 2008. "A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 315-329, July.
    3. Cheng, T. C. E. & Ding, Q. & Lin, B. M. T., 2004. "A concise survey of scheduling with time-dependent processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Lee, C. -Y. & Leon, V. J., 2001. "Machine scheduling with a rate-modifying activity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 119-128, January.
    5. Chen, Jen-Shiang, 2008. "Optimization models for the tool change scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 888-894, October.
    6. Lodree Jr., Emmett J. & Geiger, Christopher D., 2010. "A note on the optimal sequence position for a rate-modifying activity under simple linear deterioration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 644-648, March.
    7. Yang, Suh-Jenq & Yang, Dar-Li, 2010. "Minimizing the makespan on single-machine scheduling with aging effect and variable maintenance activities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 528-533, December.
    8. Biskup, Dirk, 1999. "Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 173-178, May.
    9. Gordon, Valery S. & Strusevich, Vitaly A., 2009. "Single machine scheduling and due date assignment with positionally dependent processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 57-62, October.
    10. Mosheiov, Gur, 2001. "Scheduling problems with a learning effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 687-693, August.
    11. Mohan Gopalakrishnan & Sanjay L. Ahire & David M. Miller, 1997. "Maximizing the Effectiveness of a Preventive Maintenance System: An Adaptive Modeling Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 827-840, June.
    12. Chen, Wen-Jinn, 2009. "Minimizing number of tardy jobs on a single machine subject to periodic maintenance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 591-599, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liliana Grigoriu & Dirk Briskorn, 2017. "Scheduling jobs and maintenance activities subject to job-dependent machine deteriorations," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 183-197, April.
    2. Yin, Yunqiang & Wang, Yan & Cheng, T.C.E. & Liu, Wenqi & Li, Jinhai, 2017. "Parallel-machine scheduling of deteriorating jobs with potential machine disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 17-28.
    3. Finke, Gerd & Gara-Ali, Ahmed & Espinouse, Marie-Laure & Jost, Vincent & Moncel, Julien, 2017. "Unified matrix approach to solve production-maintenance problems on a single machine," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 140-146.
    4. repec:spr:jsched:v:20:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s10951-016-0497-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Gara-Ali, Ahmed & Finke, Gerd & Espinouse, Marie-Laure, 2016. "Parallel-machine scheduling with maintenance: Praising the assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 90-97.
    6. Yang, Lixing & Zhou, Xuesong & Gao, Ziyou, 2014. "Credibility-based rescheduling model in a double-track railway network: a fuzzy reliable optimization approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 75-93.
    7. Gawiejnowicz, Stanisław & Kurc, Wiesław, 2015. "Structural properties of time-dependent scheduling problems with the lp norm objective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PB), pages 196-202.
    8. Xu, Dehua & Wan, Long & Liu, Aihua & Yang, Dar-Li, 2015. "Single machine total completion time scheduling problem with workload-dependent maintenance duration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 101-106.
    9. repec:eee:apmaco:v:273:y:2016:i:c:p:570-583 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Rustogi, Kabir & Strusevich, Vitaly A., 2012. "Simple matching vs linear assignment in scheduling models with positional effects: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 393-407.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:40:y:2012:i:6:p:791-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.