IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfinin/v4y1995i1p77-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual Trading: Winners, Losers, and Market Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Sarkar Asani

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarkar Asani, 1995. "Dual Trading: Winners, Losers, and Market Impact," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 77-93, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:4:y:1995:i:1:p:77-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042-9573(85)71004-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chakravarty, Sugato & Sarkar, Asani, 2002. "A model of broker's trading, with applications to order flow internalization," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 19-36.
    2. Sugato Chakravarty & Asani Sarkar, 1998. "An analysis of brokers' trading with applications to order flow internalization and off-exchange sales," Research Paper 9813, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    3. Peter Locke & Asani Sarkar & Lifan Wu, 1996. "Did the good guys lose?: heterogeneous traders and regulatory restrictions on dual trading," Research Paper 9611, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    4. Sugato Chakravarty & Asani Sarkar & Lifan Wu, 1997. "Estimating the adverse selection cost in markets with multiple informed traders," Research Paper 9713, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    5. Markus Baldauf & Christoph Frei & Joshua Mollner, 2022. "Principal Trading Arrangements: When Are Common Contracts Optimal?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 3112-3128, April.
    6. Sugato Chakravarty & Asani Sarkar, 1997. "Traders' broker choice, market liquidity and market structure," Staff Reports 28, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    7. Sugato Chakravarty & Asani Sarkar & Lifan Wu, 1998. "Estimating the adverse selection and fixed costs of trading in markets with multiple informed traders," Research Paper 9814, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    8. Nishide, Katsumasa & Tian, Yuan, 2022. "Brokered versus dealer markets: Impact of proprietary trading with transaction fees," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Sugato Chakravarty & Asani Sarkar, 1997. "Can competition between brokers mitigate agency conflicts with their customers?," Staff Reports 25, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    10. Jan Hanousek & František Kopøiva, 2011. "Detecting Information-Driven Trading in a Dealers Market," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 61(3), pages 204-229, July.
    11. Locke, Peter R. & Sarkar, Asani & Wu, Lifan, 1999. "Market Liquidity and Trader Welfare in Multiple Dealer Markets: Evidence from Dual Trading Restrictions," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 57-88, March.
    12. FOUCAULT, Thierry & LESCOURRET, Laurence, 2001. "Information sharing, liquidity and transaction costs in floor-based trading systems," HEC Research Papers Series 742, HEC Paris.
    13. Nicolas S. Lambert & Michael Ostrovsky & Mikhail Panov, 2018. "Strategic Trading in Informationally Complex Environments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 1119-1157, July.
    14. Bernhardt, Dan & Taub, Bart, 2010. "How and when is dual trading irrelevant?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 295-320, May.
    15. Sugato Chakravarty & Asani Sarkar, 2002. "A model of broker's trading, with applications to order flow internalization," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 19-36.
    16. Hun Y. Park & Asani Sarkar & Lifan Wu, 1998. "Do Brokers Misallocate Customer Trades? Evidence From Futures Markets," Finance 9801002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Frantisek Kopriva, 2008. "Source of Information-Driven Trading on the Prague Stock Exchange," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp365, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    18. Chakravarty, Sugato & Li, Kai, 2003. "A Bayesian analysis of dual trader informativeness in futures markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 355-371, May.
    19. Katsumasa Nishide & Yuan Tian, 2015. "Auction versus Dealership Markets: Impact of Proprietary Trading with Transaction Fees," KIER Working Papers 922, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:4:y:1995:i:1:p:77-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622875 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.