Red and blue investing: Values and finance
Using data on the political contributions and stock holdings of U.S. investment managers, we find that mutual fund managers who make campaign donations to Democrats hold less of their portfolios (relative to non-donors or Republican donors) in companies that are deemed socially irresponsible (e.g., tobacco, guns, or defense firms or companies with bad employee relations or diversity records). Although explicit socially responsible investing (SRI) funds are more likely to be managed by Democratic managers, this result holds for non-SRI funds and after controlling for other fund and manager characteristics. The effect is more than one-half of the underweighting observed for SRI funds.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:103:y:2012:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.