IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v170y2024ics0148296323006525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeling rewarded and entitled to be served: Understanding the influence of self- versus regular checkout on customer loyalty

Author

Listed:
  • Nusrat, Farhana
  • Huang, Yanliu

Abstract

As the popularity of self-checkout systems has been increasing in recent years, it is imperative to understand how their usage impacts customers’ shopping experiences. This research directly compares self- and regular checkout systems to determine how they affect customer loyalty differently. Through five studies, we demonstrate that regular (vs. self-) checkout service makes customers more loyal to the store (e.g., more likely to revisit the store in the future). Additionally, customers’ perceived saved effort during the checkout process and their sense of entitlement to be served parallelly mediate the effect. The number of items purchased during a shopping trip also moderates the effect of checkout type on customer loyalty. Finally, when shoppers are primed to think of the extra effort involved in self-checkout as a rewarding experience, their store loyalty is similar to that of regular checkout shoppers. This research provides both theoretical contributions and practical implications for retail marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Nusrat, Farhana & Huang, Yanliu, 2024. "Feeling rewarded and entitled to be served: Understanding the influence of self- versus regular checkout on customer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:170:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323006525
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323006525
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:170:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323006525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.