IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v140y2022icp384-393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sociocultural factors during COVID-19 pandemic: Information consumption on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano
  • Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G.

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to describe the sociocultural factors that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Twitter is used as an instrument for data collection. The study is qualitative and uses the netnographic method. To analyze the flow of messages posted on Twitter, the model proposed by Perez-Cepeda and Arias-Bolzmann (2020), which describes sociocultural factors, is taken as a basis. The semantics that people use are a type of functional knowledge that reveals sociocultural factors. Sentiments were analyzed through lexicon-based methods, which are the most suitable. The categorization and classification of the data are performed based on the information that users post on Twitter. The tweets related to COVID-19 describe the sociocultural issues and the level of sentiment around the pandemic. The discussion centers on the COVID-19 pandemic, information consumption, lexicon, sociocultural factors and sentiment analysis. The study was limited to the social media Twitter; another limitation was not to consider the social group of the users who interact with @pandemic_Covid-19, official account of the World Health Organization (WHO). This research contributes to the social sciences, focusing on sociocultural interaction through the use of the social network Twitter. It describes the link between sociocultural factors and the level of sentiment on issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano & Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G., 2022. "Sociocultural factors during COVID-19 pandemic: Information consumption on Twitter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 384-393.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:140:y:2022:i:c:p:384-393
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321008158
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano & Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G., 2021. "Refugee information consumption on Twitter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 529-537.
    2. -, 2020. "Education in the time of COVID-19," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 45905 edited by Eclac.
    3. repec:ecr:col016:45905 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Kozinets, Robert V, 2002. "Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 20-38, June.
    5. Zhunchen Luo & Yang Yu & Miles Osborne & Ting Wang, 2015. "Structuring Tweets for improving Twitter search," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2522-2539, December.
    6. Markus Giesler & Craig J. Thompson, 2016. "A Tutorial in Consumer Research: Process Theorization in Cultural Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 497-508.
    7. Qingliang Miao & Qiudan Li & Daniel Zeng, 2010. "Fine‐grained opinion mining by integrating multiple review sources," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(11), pages 2288-2299, November.
    8. Qingliang Miao & Qiudan Li & Daniel Zeng, 2010. "Fine-grained opinion mining by integrating multiple review sources," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(11), pages 2288-2299, November.
    9. Julio Torales & Marcelo O’Higgins & João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia & Antonio Ventriglio, 2020. "The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(4), pages 317-320, June.
    10. Seungil Yum, 2020. "Social Network Analysis for Coronavirus (COVID‐19) in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1642-1647, July.
    11. Eric J. Arnould & Craig J. Thompson, 2005. "Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 868-882, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiberius, Victor & Chen, Nicole & Bartels, Mirko & Oelsnitz, Dietrich von der, 2024. "Breaking out! A netnography study on motives of a digital nomad lifestyle," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Thanwamas Kassanuk & Khongdet Phasinam, 2023. "A Hybrid Binary Bird Swarm Optimization (BSO) and Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) for VM Allocation and Load Balancing in Cloud," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Mafael, Alexander & Ulqinaku, Aulona & Biraglia, Alessandro, 2023. "Service failures in times of crisis: An analysis of eWOM emotionality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Cepeda, Maximiliano & Arias-Bolzmann, Leopoldo G., 2021. "Refugee information consumption on Twitter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 529-537.
    2. Giuseppe Pedeliento & Federico Mangiò & Gabriele Murtas & Daniela Andreini, 2023. "Market system dynamics (MSD): A process-oriented review of the literature," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 173-195, December.
    3. Jack Coffin & Andreas Chatzidakis, 2021. "The Möbius strip of market spatiality: mobilizing transdisciplinary dialogues between CCT and the marketing mainstream," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 40-59, June.
    4. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    5. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:904-925. is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Muhammad Waqas & Zalfa Laili Binti Hamzah & Noor Akma Mohd Salleh, 2021. "Customer experience: a systematic literature review and consumer culture theory-based conceptualisation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 135-176, February.
    7. Thanwamas Kassanuk & Khongdet Phasinam, 2023. "A Hybrid Binary Bird Swarm Optimization (BSO) and Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) for VM Allocation and Load Balancing in Cloud," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Zunqiang Zhang & Guoqing Chen & Jin Zhang & Xunhua Guo & Qiang Wei, 2016. "Providing Consistent Opinions from Online Reviews: A Heuristic Stepwise Optimization Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 236-250, May.
    9. O'Shaughnessy, Nicholas, 2008. "Romancing Alpacas: A commentary," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 509-511, May.
    10. Stoeckl, Verena E. & Luedicke, Marius K., 2015. "Doing well while doing good? An integrative review of marketing criticism and response," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2452-2463.
    11. Brownlie, Douglas & Hewer, Paul, 2011. "Articulating consumers through practices of vernacular creativity," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 243-253, June.
    12. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2017. "Liquid Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 582-597.
    13. Fei Long & Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan & Norzalita Abd Aziz & Muhammad Khalilur Rahman, 2022. "Predicting young Chinese consumers’ intentions to purchase Western brands: Structural model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Podoshen, Jeffrey S. & Venkatesh, Vivek & Wallin, Jason & Andrzejewski, Susan A. & Jin, Zheng, 2015. "Dystopian dark tourism: An exploratory examination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 316-328.
    15. Bodkin, Charles D. & Amato, Christie & Peters, Cara, 2009. "The role of conflict, culture, and myth in creating attitudinal commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 1013-1019, October.
    16. Skandalis, Alexandros & Byrom, John & Banister, Emma, 2019. "Experiential marketing and the changing nature of extraordinary experiences in post-postmodern consumer culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 43-50.
    17. Bernd Schmitt & J Joško Brakus & Alessandro Biraglia, 2022. "Consumption Ideology [Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 74-95.
    18. Sarah C. Grace, 2021. "The intermingling of meanings in marketing: semiology and phenomenology in consumer culture theory," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 70-80, June.
    19. Marie-Catherine Husson Paquier, 2018. "The monastic product’s biography, a sacralization wave," Post-Print hal-02123458, HAL.
    20. Saba Resnik & Mateja Kos Koklič, 2018. "User-Generated Tweets about Global Green Brands: A Sentiment Analysis Approach," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 30(2), pages 125-145.
    21. Boyaval, Marine & Herbert, Maud, 2018. "One for all and all for one? The bliss and torment in communal entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 412-422.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:140:y:2022:i:c:p:384-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.